similar to: Re: Applications using fsync cause hangs for several seconds every few minutes

Hello, I have a 5.5TB Btrfs filesystem on top of a md-raid 5 device. Now if i run some file operations like find, i get these messages. kernel is 2.6.38.5-1 on arch linux May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089713] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089834] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188

Hello all. What we have: SL6 - kernel 2.6.32-131.2.1.el6.x86_64 btrfs on mdadm RAID5 with 8 HDD - 27T partition. I see this at top: 1182 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 100.0 0.0 16:39.73 [btrfs-delalloc-] And LA is grow. What is this and how can I fix it? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of

Hello, I got a kernel bug error, my guess from BTRFS. Here is the report, Oct 22 20:44:43 localhost kernel: [25554.947970] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000030 Oct 22 20:44:43 localhost kernel: [25554.948002] IP: [<ffffffffa01ab027>] btrfs_print_leaf+0x37/0x880 [btrfs] Oct 22 20:44:43 localhost kernel: [25554.948037] PGD bfa44067 PUD bfa43067 PMD 0 Oct

On 06/30/2011 09:13 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On 06/30/2011 10:12 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote: >> On 06/29/2011 08:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: >>>> Ok - I upgrade to 2.6.39-2 but it is seems to all things get worse. >>>> Now I see [btrfs-transacti]& btrfs-endio-wri] 80-100% all the time and >>>> io performance looks like lower then before.

Running an Ubuntu Raring VM which was built a week ago that is now running 3.8-rc6, I was booting it last night when it hung. After a few forced reboots, it came back up and I found the attached in kern.log. Mostly, the VM has been used for testing anisble deployment, so not a lot of work, just upgrading and installing software, then rebooting. Are these reports useful? Is there any

[11558.527680] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [11558.527708] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1337! [11558.527730] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [11558.527764] CPU 1 [11558.527776] Modules linked in: loop nls_cp437 vfat fat dm_mod xfs exportfs jfs usb_storage uas fuse ext4 jbd2 mbcache snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek arc4 iwlwifi snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec uvcvideo

Welcome, I''ve been using btrfs for over a 3 months to store my personal data on my NAS server. Almost all interactions with files on the server are done using unison synchronizer. After another use of bedup (https://github.com/g2p/bedup) on my btrfs volume I experienced huge perfomance loss with synchronization. It now takes over 3 hours what have taken only 15 minutes! File

Dear Devs, I have x4 4TB HDDs formatted with: mkfs.btrfs -L bu-16TB_0 -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sd[cdef] /etc/fstab mounts with the options: noatime,noauto,space_cache,inode_cache All on kernel 3.8.13. Upon using rsync to copy some heavily hardlinked backups from ReiserFS, I''ve seen: The following "block rsv returned -28" is repeated 7 times until there is a call trace

Hi, I tried very promising btrfs to test it a little and I experienced a little bug in implementation. I''m not sure where the bug lies however this works quite well to reproduce the problem: dd if=/dev/zero of=mountme bs=4k count=100000 dd if=/dev/zero of=mountme2 bs=4k count=100000 mkfs.btrfs mountme mkfs.btrfs mountme2 mkdir loop loop2 mount -o loop mountme loop mount -o loop mountme

Hiya, Recently, a btrfs file system of mine started to behave very poorly with some btrfs kernel tasks taking 100% of CPU time. # btrfs fi show /dev/sdb Label: none uuid: b3ce8b16-970e-4ba8-b9d2-4c7de270d0f1 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 4.25TB devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.52TB path /dev/sdc devid 1 size 2.70TB used 1.49TB path /dev/sda4 devid 3 size

Hi, I have a home server on Linux Arch (kernel 3.11.2) that uses multi-device btrfs on root filesystem. Until recently it worked completely fine. And yesterday I rebooted it and the machine did not wake up. I booted from a USB (kernel 3.10) and tried to mount the filesystem. Here is OOPs I see [ 41.676217] device fsid 25e6a6fa-fe1f-4be5-a638-eeac948f8c21 devid 8 transid 164237 /dev/sda [

Glück Auf! I use now kernel 3.2. The filesystem was originally created under 2.6.39 on 1 whole hdd, mounted with "noatime,nodiratime,inode_cache". I use it for backups: rsync the whole system to a subvolume, snapshot it and then delete some tempfiles in the snapshot, which are 90% of the full-backup, all once a day. In figures: on this 1 TB hdd is the full-backup with around 600 GiB and

Hello, I''d like to know if there has been any discussion about adding a new feature to write (add) data at an offset, but without overwriting existing data, or re-writing the existing data. Essentially, in-place addition/removal of data to a file at a place other than the end of the file. Some possible use-cases of such a feature would be: (a) Databases (currently hack around this by

Is this useful to anyone? Got this after a crash/reboot: if (block_rsv) { WARN_ON(block_rsv->size > 0); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, block_rsv); } ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf() Hardware name: 2429A78 Modules linked in:

I tried to unmount a btrfs filesystem located in a external usb hard drive. This belonged to a raid1 data and metadata filesystem mounted in degraded mode. Unfortunately, I couldn''t save the image of filesystem but I could see this error in kern.log: Aug 4 02:23:55 rohan kernel: [ 3747.840027] usb 1-3: new high-speed USB device number 8 using ehci_hcd Aug 4 02:23:55 rohan kernel: [

Hey, I''ve a 2x4TB RAID1 setup with btrfs on kernel 3.8.0. Under high I/O load (BackupPC dump or writing a large file over gigabit) I get messages in syslog such as the one mentioned in the subject. The full non-logcheck-ignored log is under [1]. A BackupPC dump between the same exact machines onto a 2TB ext4 volume take 90 minutes on average, the process on the btrfs volume took 465

I noticed a huge problem with the free space cache that was presenting as an early ENOSPC. Turns out when writing the free space cache out I forgot to take into account pinned extents and more importantly clusters. This would result in us leaking free space everytime we unmounted the filesystem and remounted it. I fix this by making sure to check and see if the current block group has a cluster

I was using my computer normally when suddenly my btrfs volume became read-only. This is on Chris'' for-linus branch (latest commit cb77fcd88) Here''s the relevant excerpt from dmesg [ 50.877500] r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up [ 50.880296] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth1: link becomes ready [ 60.959215] eth1: no IPv6 routers present [ 1904.463247] atkbd serio0: Unknown key

I have a couple computers running 2.6.38 (Ubuntu Natty 2.6.38-8-generic), and on both of them "btrfs device scan" comes back with nothing other than "failed to read /dev/sr0" One computer has a btrfs RAID-1 volume, and the other has two separate btrfs filesystems. The results are the same whether the filesystems are mounted or not. Why is "btrfs device scan" not

What are the recommendations for running KVM images on BTRFS systems using kernel 3.4?  I saw older posts on the web complaining about poor performance, but I know a lot of work has gone into btrfs since then.  There also seemed to be the nocow option, but I didn''t find anything that said it actualy helped. Anybody have ideas? Thanks, Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line