similar to: BTRFS Duplicated UUID on /home

brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM, <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > >>Just a completely different question...is there any plans

Hi, I have setup about a year ago a BTRFS RAID 1 filesystem on two 2TB Western Digital WD20EARS hard drives and I have created subvolumes that I mount regularly as I need them. I put mostly music, videos and various files on them as well as some Git bare repositories for my work files but for the last couple of weeks, there seems to be some activity happening on the drives for a few minutes and

I''ve been monitoring the lists for a while now but didn''t see this problem mentioned in particular: I''ve got a fairly standard desktop system at home, 700gb WD drive, nothing special, with 2 btrfs filesystems and some snapshots. The system runs for days, and I''ve noticed unusual disk activity the other evening - turns out that it''s taking forever to

Hello, I'm researching the best method of providing about 20 users in a production environment the same functionality as they would have on a Netapp NFS share. The O/S I will be using is CentOS 5 or 6 (max flex on which one) and the hardware is a disk array directly (12 SAS disks 7TB un-configured brand new) attached to a HP 580 G 7. I've done some reading on ZFS on Linux ,fuse-ZFS,

On 18/05/2019 14:19, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello > >> No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs >> and quotas. > I would have thought that btrfs is becoming more mainstream now. And > then, Samba and Quotas should be rather common... >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > >> Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf

Yes. It is in the review phase . Actually Sriram implemented zfs snapshot and Mark implemented the brtfs and Mark merged these two patches [1]. Adding them in cc . Reviews are most welcome. [1] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17865/ Regards Rafi KC On 08/17/2017 05:22 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Hi, > Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. > are there any

This problem is found in meego testing: http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6672 A file in btrfs is mmaped and the mmaped buffer is passed to pwrite to write to the same page of the same file. In btrfs_file_aio_write(), the pages is locked by prepare_pages(). So when btrfs_copy_from_user() is called, page fault happens and the same page needs to be locked again in filemap_fault(). The fix is to

Hello, I have installed since 6 months a PDC with samba and there is an endless problem : the roaming profile synchronisation !!! THE problem : Sometimes after the logout of a client, the roaming profile is not synchronised on server. So when client connect on another clients, it seems that some data have been loosed... After there is no later synchronisation... So mails in profile are often

We create two subvolumes (meego_root and meego_home) in btrfs root directory. And set meego_root as default mount subvolume. After we remount btrfs, meego_root is mounted to top directory by default. Then when we try to mount meego_home (subvol=meego_home) to a subdirectory, it failed. The problem is when default mount subvolume is set to meego_root, we search meego_home in meego_root but can not

On 18/05/2019 10:22, Hendrik Friedel via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I a bit surprised to get no replies at all... > How come? Lack of information? Lack of clarity? > > Greetings, > Hendrik > No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs and quotas. Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf etc. Why are you using a filesystem that your

Hello all, I recently had a power failure and can no longer mount my /home directory. The harddrive has two BTRFS partitions: sda7(/) and sda8(/home). The / partition loads up just fine, but /home does not. I''ve tried btrfsck as shown below and I''ve included dmesg pertaining to btrfs. This is on ArchLinux and the software versions are as follows: btrfs-progs-unstable

I ran into a panic while running find -xdev | xargs brtfs fi defrag ''{}''. I don''t remember the exact command because the history was not saved. I also started and stopped it a few times however. The kernel logs were on a different filesystem. Here is the kern.log:http://fpaste.org/9383/36729191/ My setup is two 2TB hard drives in raid 1. They are both sata drives so

I am using NFS over brtfs (vanilla 3.8.5) for heavy CoW to clone virtual disks with sizes 20-50GB. It worked OK for a couple of days, but yesterday it crashed. Reboot fixed the problem and I do not see any data corruption. I have a couple of different kdumps, I will include one as text and attach the other ones. I am using Fedora 18 with vanilla 3.8.5. The filesystem is created over a SAN volume

Hi, Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. are there any news? Thanks, Arman. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170817/df8afb76/attachment.html>

An installation of MS-DOS has various files in a /DOS directory, which COMMAND.COM looking like a reasonable signal that its MS-DOS or a very close relative there-of. This is validated with an MS-DOS 6.22 install. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- BTW, I'm unclear if we should make any attempt to try to detect and report Windows 3.x as a separate distro,

Hello >No, probably a lack of users using your combination of Samba, btrfs and quotas. I would have thought that btrfs is becoming more mainstream now. And then, Samba and Quotas should be rather common... > >Of course, more info may help, what is in your smb.conf etc. Added at the end of this mail. >Why are you using a filesystem that your OS doesn't officially support ? That

Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO > Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to > Miloslav> it. Because the controller does not support pass-through for > Miloslav> the drives, we use 16x RAID-0 on controller. So, we get > Miloslav> /dev/sda ... /dev/sdp (roughly) in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, I believe that I can pretty reliably reproduce the BUG mentioned in the attached dmesg output. (This doesn''t mean that you can, but I''ll detail what I''ve done here.) [This BUG is the same one that I reported last night.] 1) Create a 2 GB dynamically expanding disk. 2) Attach it to a VirtualBox machine. 3) Start the

2012/6/5 Kok, Auke-jan H <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote on systemd-devel list: > It seems your system is taking well into 15+ seconds before btrfs is > actually *ready* on your system, which seems to be the main hiccup > (note, speculation here). I''ve personally become a bit displeased with > btrfs performance recently myself, so, I''m wondering if you should

hey guys! im new and am not exactly sure how things work.. i want to play maplestory and im currently using meego os. so iv been advised to install wine. wine is telling me to copy two .dll files into system37 however i am having trouble doing this... so im using the program WINE FILE.. however i cant copy and paste.. so i dont know how to get those two .dll files into the system37 folder