similar to: [PATCH v3 0/5] btrfs-progs: scrub interface

I hit a problem that i can not start scrub when i am trying to track superblock generation mismatch problems. The fact is that we are trying to check whether we have started a scrub operation in userspace, this will make us can''t start scrub if that record file is damaged itself. By adding a option to skip that check, everything will be fine. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong

On 3/9/2016 9:02 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 08 Mar 2016, at 01:50, Pavel Stano <stanojr at websupport.sk> wrote: >> >> sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 upwards. >> It is caused by this commit. >> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/664bf3e236c214aee86294483c379e4fa66c2e63 >> >> in src/lib-fs/fs-sis.c function

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 upwards. It is caused by this commit. https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/664bf3e236c214aee86294483c379e4fa66c2e63 in src/lib-fs/fs-sis.c function fs_sis_try_link() is comparation of inodes of hash files. Because fs_stat() after that commit use fstat() on open fd of temporary file instead of

Currently, the following commands succeed. # cat /proc/swaps Filename Type Size Used Priority /dev/sda3 partition 8388604 0 -1 /dev/sdc8 partition 9765884 0 -2 # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc8 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-165-g82ac345 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see

Hi gang, I was a little surprised to see that patch go by recently which fixed an endian bug. I went to see how sparse checking looked and it was.. broken. I got it going again in my Fedora environment. Most of the patches are just cleanups, but there *were* three real bugs lurking in all that sparse warning spam. So I maintain that it''s worth our time to keep it going and fix

This adds ioctl BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSIDS which reads the fs info through the btrfs-control Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed,

The btrfs tool is changed in order to support command line parameters to configure the IO priority of the scrub tasks. Also the default is changed. The default IO priority for scrub is the idle class now. Some basic performance measurements have been done with the goal to measure which IO priority for scrub gives the best overall disk data throughput. The kernel was configured to use the CFQ IO

From: anand jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Anand Jain (1): [RFC] Add btrfs autosnap feature Makefile | 6 +- autosnap.c | 1553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ autosnap.h | 81 +++ btrfs-list.c | 140 +++++- btrfs.c | 46 ++- btrfs_cmds.c | 186 +++++++- btrfs_cmds.h | 3 +- scrub.c | 1 + 8 files changed, 1982 insertions(+), 34

This series adds an initial implementation for scrub. It works quite straightforward. The usermode issues an ioctl for each device in the fs. For each device, it enumerates the allocated device chunks. For each chunk, the contained extents are enumerated and the data checksums fetched. The extents are read sequentially and the checksums verified. If an error occurs (checksum or EIO), a good copy

We have extended collectd virt plugin to extract info about disk usage from a libvirt domain using libguestfs. We have had several issues with it which were raised here in 2018 by Peter Dimitrov. Currently the collectd plugin works fine and retrieves the required statistics. Current collectd configuration says that interval of reading statistics (interval of calling all plugins read functions) is

Hi All- I have SuSE 8.2 installed on two different Intel machines, with (as far as I can determine) all required packages for doing what I'm trying to do here. Both machines suffer the same problems. I didn't find any SuSE 8.2 rpms, so I'm trying to build Samba 3.0 (stable) (24th Sep, 2003) on either of these machines but am having problems with it. As root, I did a