similar to: [btrfs-delalloc-]

On 06/30/2011 09:13 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On 06/30/2011 10:12 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote: >> On 06/29/2011 08:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: >>>> Ok - I upgrade to 2.6.39-2 but it is seems to all things get worse. >>>> Now I see [btrfs-transacti]& btrfs-endio-wri] 80-100% all the time and >>>> io performance looks like lower then before.

On 06/21/2011 01:15 PM, Jan Stilow wrote: > Hello, > > Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek <at> gentoo.org> writes: >> [...] >> >> Every few minutes, (I guess) when applications do fsync (firefox, >> xchat, vim, etc), all applications that use fsync() hang for several >> seconds, and applications that use general IO suffer extreme >> slowdowns.

Liu fixed part of this problem and unfortunately I steered him in slightly the wrong direction and so didn''t completely fix the problem. The problem is we limit the size of the delalloc range we are looking for to max bytes and then we try to lock that range. If we fail to lock the pages in that range we will shrink the max bytes to a single page and re loop. However if our first page

While untar''ing an image to an sd card via a reader, I got the following bug. The system also has a btrfs root, and a whole swath of processes went into uninterruptable sleep. I was able to poke around via ssh and sysrq, and already had netconsole set up to capture the bug. Root fs is on /dev/sdi1, and /dev/sdj2 is the card reader which was the target of the untar. [29571.448889] sd

I can get btrfs to throw a kernel bug easily by running btrfs fi defrag on some files in 3.9.0: May 7 01:57:33 caper kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.9.0-030900-generic (apw@gomeisa) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #201304291257 SMP Mon Apr 29 16:58:15 UTC 2013 ... May 7 02:09:21 caper kernel: [ 726.745485] ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 7 02:09:21 caper

Hi - I''m trying btrfs with kernel 2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64 (a Fedora kernel). I''m just doing a tar-to-tar copy onto the file system with compress- force=zlib. Here are some traces of the stuck processes. flush-btrfs-5 seems to be stuck: Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] flush-btrfs-5 D ffff88003c7bae60 0 11712 2 0x00000080 Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel:

When testing with max_extents=4k, we enospc out really really early. The reason for this is we really overwhelm the system with our worst case calculation. When we try to flush delalloc, we don''t want everybody to wait around forever, so we wake up the waiters when we''ve done some of the work in hopes that its enough work to get everything they need done. The problem with this

Hi all, Last week we had 2 times an "uncorrectable ecc memory error" crash on our server on the same memory module. After removing the faulty module and restarting the server, everything was working again. However, yesterday we had a soft lockup and had to restart the server again. No warning or ecc error this time. Everything is working now, but we want to avoid this in the future

Hello all! #pkg_info | grep dovecot dovecot-1.1.3_1 dovecot-managesieve-0.10.3 dovecot-sieve-1.1.5_1 Im trying to do this: Im have a LDAP account with multiple "mail" field like this(many strings cuted): dn: uid=k.proskurin,ou=Users,dc=Moscow,dc=CAS uid: k.proskurin userPassword: {CRYPT}$1$ETadxf6G$O2bNUQVSHxksUp08V/iY2. mail: sysadmin at domain.off mail: proskurin-kv at domain.off

Hi all. I was doing some testing with writing out data to a BTFS filesystem with the compress-force option. With 1 program running, I saw btfs-delalloc taking about 1 CPU worth of time, much as could be expected. I then started up 2 programs at the same time, writing data to the BTRFS volume. btrfs-delalloc still only used 1 CPU worth of time. Is btrfs-delalloc threaded, to where it can use

Hello all. I have 2 Dovecot IMAP servers with different mailboxes. What serves different email domains. I want to add one Dovecot Proxy server and make him understand based on user domain - were it need to transfer a connection. I use LDAP auth based on "mail" attribute. It is possible? P.S. Proxy documentation at dovecot.org not help at all and seems to not complited. :-( --

Hello! I think about migrate from FreeBSD to Linux because I need DRBD for clustering. I want to use Debian Lenny but run on some problems. I want near latest Dovecot packages. Native repos are too old. Backports seems to don`t have a Sieve&Managesieve support and we need it(am I wrong?). Stephan Bosch auto packeges is not for production. How could I solve this without make own

We need an smb_mb() before waitqueue_active to avoid missing wakeups. Before Mitch was hitting a deadlock between the ordered flushers and the transaction commit because the ordered flushers were waiting for more refs and were never woken up, so those smp_mb()''s are the most important. Everything else I added for correctness sake and to avoid getting bitten by this again somewhere else.

Hello all. I'm have this problem: I'm want auth users by "uid" filed but this filed uniq only in one LDAP container. So im what to tell dovecot were to look some "uid" by "mail" filed of this user. Can im do this: pass_filter = (&(objectClass=mailUser)(mail=*@%d)(uid=%n)) Will this construction work? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill

Hello, I have been having some crashes like this. Since I upgraded to 3.6.4 they have become common. The crashes happen pretty randomly during normal system usage. After the syslog messages the system stays semi usable for a minute, but when I run any new program it hangs. I had to downgrade to 3.6.2 to get my system usable again. Is there any way I can help find the cause of those crashes?

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

Hello all. Im try to make a SMTP Auth using Docecot SASL. Im use swaks for tests. Im store users in LDAP. As im understand for CRAM & DIGEST MD5 we need to store pass in a clear text?... Ok. mail: admin3 at domain.off userPassword: 123 <- Clear text What im do %swaks -a CRAM-MD5 -au admin3 at domain.off -ap 123 To: admin3 at domain.off === Trying mx.domain.off:25... === Connected to

Hello Anyons has tested this configuration with success ? I'll test it in few days and I am wondering if I am alone :-) Thanks

Hello all. May be not in right list but... I have a email system based on: Exim-4.69 + Dovecot-1.1.11 on FreeBSD-7.1 I need to make a stress test on it. Something like a 1000 concurrent conection to IMAP and SMTP. What tool can help me? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill

Hello. I plan to use OCFS2 + DRBD for email server. Problem: I use "seeker" for testing http://www.linuxinsight.com/how_fast_is_your_disk.html And get this: Results: 65 seeks/second, 15.23 ms random access time Then I do rm of many files - it fals to 10 seeks/second and performance is terrible. What can I do to increase it? What`s wrong? Below is many info. What we have: Debian