similar to: Is it possible for the ext4/btrfs file system to pass some context related info to low level block driver?

Hi. I got following BUG trace. This is violation of BUG_ON(!buffer_locked(bh)) check on submit_bh() function. In write_dev_supers(), if wait parameter is set and buffer_uptodate() check is negative, submit_bh() is executed and hit above BUG_ON. So I fixed this issue. Thanks. Jun 9 00:41:32 dl580 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Jun 9 00:41:32 dl580 kernel: kernel BUG at

Hello, I am trying to figure out where to change mmc rate to maximum speed. All images are loaded from emmc. I see in syslinux.c that it calls loadfile(), but I don't see how the filesystem fread() is actually done from emmc, and where to change its speed to maximum. Thank you for any comment, ranran

Hello Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of the restart of services ) Home partition (the one receiving the mail) is based on ocfs2 created from drbd block device in primary/primary mode These drbd devices are based on lvm. system is running linux-3.5.0, identical symptom with linux 3.3 and 3.2 but working with linux 3.0 kernel reproduced on two machines ( so

checks IO error in ocfs2_get_sector(). this patch is based on 1.4 git. Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- Index: fs/ocfs2/super.c =================================================================== --- fs/ocfs2/super.c (revision 128) +++ fs/ocfs2/super.c (working copy) @@ -1203,6 +1203,12 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super unlock_buffer(*bh);

Hello all, Is there any patches for btrfs to use enhanced area in eMMC (it will allow to boost performance i.e. it very useful to keep metadata within this area) ? If it''s exist let me know how to find it and use it. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

checks IO error in ocfs2_get_sector(). this patch is based on Linus' git. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- diff -up ./fs/ocfs2/super.c.orig ./fs/ocfs2/super.c --- ./fs/ocfs2/super.c.orig 2009-02-12 18:05:19.023685000 -0800 +++ ./fs/ocfs2/super.c 2009-02-12 18:07:13.995623000 -0800 @@ -1537,6 +1537,13 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super

Hello List, Running 2.4.21-pre3-ac1 SMP with new quotas (usr and grp), this oops showed up while copying a large amount (about 50gigs, only 1.6 made it before the oops). I'm trying to reproduce as we speak. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 c0130956 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0002 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c0130956>] Not tainted Using defaults

Red Hat 2.2.19-6.2.12 + 0.0.7a + https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-November/002258.html (not tuned in /proc yet) + journal 4MB on each fs + 6 ext3 fs on raid1 (hda+hdc) + 1 ext3 fs on another disk not on raid1 (hdd) While untarring (tar zxf) a file that was on a ext3/raid1 onto hdd I got: ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.19-6.2.12.g1. Options used -V (default) -k

Hi, me: > > [mkdiskimage] -s does not prevent zeroizing on block device. Probably > > because truncate() fails. hpa: > Yes, we should probably fix that. The tool was originally designed for > images, not for hardware devices, and it doesn't make much sense to zero > the whole hardware device like that. Maybe for privacy reasons ? But indeed: -s should skip zeroizing,

With linux-next-2017-12-14, I get a crash when nouveau is loaded by systemd-udevd. [ 12.050625] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000058 [ 12.050627] Mem abort info: [ 12.050628] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 12.050630] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 12.050631] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 12.050632] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 12.050633] Data

Started with buffer.c v1.19. Reversing change works for me in linux-2.4.6. Loaded 16705 symbols from /lib/modules/2.4.6-pre3/System.map. Symbols match kernel version 2.4.6. Loaded 256 symbols from 12 modules. Linux version 2.4.6-pre3 (root@home1) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #2 Wed Jun 13 19:53:28 EDT 2001 ----- SNIP ------- VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1(22,64) Assertion

Dear *, I would like to obtain for each factor of my anova model the "response variable vs factor" plot with means and 95% Tukey HSD intervals. I would appreciate any information on how to do that. Cheers -------------------------------------------------------------------- Max MANFRIN Tel.: +32 (0)2 650 3168 IRIDIA - CoDE, CP 194/6

Hi Julien, Since Ian has merged most my OMAP5 patches, I decide to try to update my working tree to it today. However, it seems it doesn't work as expected. There mainly two kind of problems that I met: 1. It seems that xen no longer maps some of io memory regions described in dts. For example, the memory regions in "ocp" node of omap5.dtsi. 2. commit c88d32f4 seems to be conflict

Hi list, I have a quick question about the priority mapping of tos bits. The manpage of tc-prio shows a nice table with tos bits and the band they are mapped to: TOS Bits Means Linux Priority Band ------------------------------------------------------------ 0x0 0 Normal Service 0 Best Effort 1 0x2 1 Minimize Monetary Cost 1 Filler

On Tue 24-04-18 13:28:49, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Tue 24-04-18 13:00:11, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue 24-04-18 11:50:30, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

I''ve been reading the RoR tutorials and wiki help stuff, but I''m stuck. :( I''ve got RoR installed properly and get the "Welcome aboard! You''re riding the rails." I have an "article" controller, "article" model, and both an "article" and "articles" views (one is a remnant, I think, and no longer needed) (the

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: ext3 for 2.4 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 21:20:38 +1000 From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au> To: ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Peter J. Braam" <braam@mountainviewdata.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Summary:

dear all, I want to perform a posthoc test for my ANCOVA: a1<-aov(seeds~treatment*length) With summary(glht(a1, linfct = mcp(treatment = "Tukey"))) R tells me: "covariate interactions found -- please choose appropriate contrast" How do I build these contrasts? Ideally, I would like to have the posthoc test for the ANCOVA including a block-effect

Hi all, Here is something that i still haven''t understood. When installing PRIO, it creates 3 "classes" with priority level according to the TOS. That command line : # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio give that result : # tc qd sh qdisc prio 1: dev eth0 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 How should i read that priomap, what does it mean and how to

IMHO, the priomap explanation in the 9.2.1.1. of the LARTC HOWTO is not clear enough. I only understood it''s real behavior until I read this document from Russell Stuart: http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/doc/tc/priority.txt So, based in this information, I''ve prepared an alternative priomap explanation for this section of the HOWTO, if you like it as it is I could