similar to: Re: "open_ctree failed", unable to mount the fs

If it's a bad sector problem, you'd write to sector 17066160 and see if the drive complies or spits back a write error. It looks like a bad sector in that the same LBA is reported each time but I've only ever seen this with both a read error and a UNC error. So I'm not sure it's a bad sector. What is DID_BAD_TARGET? And what do you get for smartctl -x <dev> Chris

On 08/09/2017 01:48 PM, hw wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled >> from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). >> Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on >> the console. Here is an example: >> >> [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on the console. Here is an example: > > [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK > [168177.004050]

I have yet to see a SSD read\write error which wasn't related to disk issues like a bad sector but the controller might have an issue with the drive. To verify it you will need to burn some read\write IOPS of the drive but if it's under warranty then it's better to verify it now then later. Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email:

On 08/09/2017 10:44 PM, mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com wrote: > what file system are you using? ssd drives have different characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will wear it out rather quickly. might also check cables, often a

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, 11:55 AM Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: > To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on a > couple of systems and it corrupted pretty quickly. I'd stick with xfs/ext4 if you manage to get the drive working again. > Sounds like a hardware problem. Btrfs is explicitly optimized for SSD, the maintainers worked

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Nathan Coulson <nathan at bravenet.com> wrote: > Hello > > We were attempting to use scsi-target-utils, hosted on a xen dom0 vm using > localhost, and running into some problems. I was not able to reproduce this > on a centos 7.2 server using the default kernel. Have you tried booting the Virt SIG kernel natively and seeing if you can

On 2016-04-12 09:43 AM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > By natively, I take it using > kernel /vmlinuz (vs kernel /xen) > > Not yet, but working on setting up such an environment. > > (At this time, I was using virt-install to reproduce the problem, and > the original server we are testing on did not support kvm but the 2nd > server does). > > On 2016-04-12 03:26 AM, George

I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on the console. Here is an example: [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK [168177.004050] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 CDB: Read(10)

To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on a couple of systems and it corrupted pretty quickly. I'd stick with xfs/ext4 if you manage to get the drive working again. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com

Hello Nathan, dear all, > We were attempting to use scsi-target-utils, hosted on a xen dom0 vm using localhost, > and running into some problems. I was not able to reproduce this on a centos 7.2 > server using the default kernel. I am seeing comparable things on our centos6 xen servers running 3.18 kernels. We have about 20 of those machines running and have started upgrading them from

By natively, I take it using kernel /vmlinuz (vs kernel /xen) Not yet, but working on setting up such an environment. (At this time, I was using virt-install to reproduce the problem, and the original server we are testing on did not support kvm but the 2nd server does). On 2016-04-12 03:26 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Nathan Coulson <nathan at

what file system are you using?? ssd drives have different characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will wear it out rather quickly.? might also check cables, often a problem particularly if they are older sata cables being run at a possibly

Hello We were attempting to use scsi-target-utils, hosted on a xen dom0 vm using localhost, and running into some problems. I was not able to reproduce this on a centos 7.2 server using the default kernel. (From dmesg) Apr 4 11:18:42 funk kernel: [ 596.511204] connection2:0: detected conn error (1022) Apr 4 11:18:42 funk kernel: connection2:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv

On 08/09/2017 10:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > If it's a bad sector problem, you'd write to sector 17066160 and see if the > drive complies or spits back a write error. It looks like a bad sector in > that the same LBA is reported each time but I've only ever seen this with > both a read error and a UNC error. So I'm not sure it's a bad sector. > > What is

Not sure if anyone has seen this probably not but thought that I would throw it out there, running centos 5.4 on a tyan s4985 and I wanted to add a hot swap drive cage to it so I added a supermicro cage and bought some drives, not wanting raid but something for storage and rsync backups. Well I decided to buy some of the newer samsung F3 hd502hj 500Gig hard drives, supposedly good performance for

dmesg output after a resume from a suspend. the device in question was /dev/sdb mounted on /home. after a device failure to resume properly, the link is then reset by the kernel but comes back as /dev/sde. /dev/sdb disappeared entirely, and is now referred to as sde. attempted to remount rw of sde, seemed to succeed, mount/mtab said that it was rw now but i couldn''t write to the volume

Hi everyone, I have one OCFS2 issue. The OS is Ubuntu, using linux kernel is 3.2.50. There are three node in the OCFS2 cluster, and all the node is using the iSCSI SAN of HP 4330 as the storage. As the storage restarted, there were two node restarted for fence without heartbeating writting on to the storage. But the last one does not restart, and it still write error message into syslog as below:

I had a busy mailserver fail on me the other day. Below is what was printed in dmesg. We first suspected a hardware failure (raid controller or something else), so we moved the drives to another (identical hardware) machine and ran fsck. Fsck complained ("short read while reading inode") and asked if I wanted to ignore and rewrite (which I did). After booting up again, the problem came

Hello! I''ve a ubuntu server running over a HVM DomU. After a hang, the domU doesn''t start again. The domU was not able to mount the virtual machine disk so I started with a live cd and I tried to mount the disk root part / with no success so I ran fsck.ext3 and it gave me input/output error in the domU and in dom0 the kernel says: Feb 14 18:22:28 scofield last message