similar to: BUG while writing to USB btrfs filesystem

I can get btrfs to throw a kernel bug easily by running btrfs fi defrag on some files in 3.9.0: May 7 01:57:33 caper kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.9.0-030900-generic (apw@gomeisa) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #201304291257 SMP Mon Apr 29 16:58:15 UTC 2013 ... May 7 02:09:21 caper kernel: [ 726.745485] ------------[ cut here ]------------ May 7 02:09:21 caper

On 12.02.2013 08:25, shyam btrfs wrote: > Hi Arne, Jan, > > I am using btrfs directly from Linux 3.8rc5 (commit > 949db153b6466c6f7cad5a427ecea94985927311). I am trying to use qgroups > functionality & with a basic random-write workload, it constantly > keeps leaking memory & within few minutes of IO, there is either > out-of-memory killer trying to kill some tasks or

Hi all, Last week we had 2 times an "uncorrectable ecc memory error" crash on our server on the same memory module. After removing the faulty module and restarting the server, everything was working again. However, yesterday we had a soft lockup and had to restart the server again. No warning or ecc error this time. Everything is working now, but we want to avoid this in the future

I''ve upgraded to linux 3.10 and enabled extended inode refs and skinny metadata extent refs with these commands: btrfstune -r /dev/sdc1 btrfstune -x /dev/sdc1 Since then, I have "WARNING: at fs/btrfs/backref.c:903 find_parent_nodes+0x616/0x815 [btrfs]()" showing up like crazy: # grep -c "WARNING: at fs/btrfs/backref.c:903" syslog 181819 That''s after just

I''ve just started playing with Btrfs, and I''m getting a log full of kernel warnings that look something like this: Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:815 clean_tree_block+0x9d/0xbb [btrfs]() Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel: Hardware name: System Product Name Feb 16 09:02:17 vlad kernel:

I am using NFS over brtfs (vanilla 3.8.5) for heavy CoW to clone virtual disks with sizes 20-50GB. It worked OK for a couple of days, but yesterday it crashed. Reboot fixed the problem and I do not see any data corruption. I have a couple of different kdumps, I will include one as text and attach the other ones. I am using Fedora 18 with vanilla 3.8.5. The filesystem is created over a SAN volume

Hello, I have been having some crashes like this. Since I upgraded to 3.6.4 they have become common. The crashes happen pretty randomly during normal system usage. After the syslog messages the system stays semi usable for a minute, but when I run any new program it hangs. I had to downgrade to 3.6.2 to get my system usable again. Is there any way I can help find the cause of those crashes?

Miao, I was trying out your patch on scalability testing for BTRFS on v3.3 kernel. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg14930.html However, I ran into a lot of warnings (see the dmesg below). Wonder if you have a more up to date version of this patch? In addition, I have to do this modification to fix a warning in your original patch. diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c

Observed on Linux 3.2.9 after the controller/disk flaked in-out. (The world still needs a SCSI error decoding tool to tell normal people what cmd and res are about.) [ 157.732885] device label srv devid 4 transid 11292 /dev/sdf [ 157.733201] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 172.936515] device label srv devid 4 transid 11292 /dev/sdf [44106.091461] ata4.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0

Hi, I''m experimenting with btrfs on top of zvol block device (using zfsonlinux), and got oops on a simple mount test. While I''m sure that zfsonlinux is somehow also at fault here (since the same test with zram works fine), the oops only shows things btrfs-related without any usable mention of zfs/zvol. Could anyone help me interpret the kernel logs, which btrfs-zvol interaction

Hello, on a fs with 4 disks, raid 10 for data, one drive was failing and has been removed. After reboot and ''mount -o degraded...'', the fs looks full, even though before removal of the failed device it was almost 80% free. root@fs0:~# df -h /mnt/b Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sde 11T 2.5T 41M 100% /mnt/b root@fs0:~# btrfs fi df /mnt/b Data,

On 3.14.18 with a BTRFS partition mounted noatime,autodefrag,compress=lzo, I see the second assertion in btrfs_set_item_key_safe() trip: void btrfs_set_item_key_safe(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path, struct btrfs_key *new_key) { struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key; struct extent_buffer *eb; int slot; eb = path->nodes[0];

We''re going to use this flag EXTENT_DEFRAG to indicate which range belongs to defragment so that we can implement snapshow-aware defrag: We set the EXTENT_DEFRAG flag when dirtying the extents that need defragmented, so later on writeback thread can differentiate between normal writeback and writeback started by defragmentation. This patch is used for the latter one. Originally patch

Hi, One of my disks, partitioned into a single btrfs partition, is showing media errors. The problem is that these errors lead to kernel panic from btrfs - that make the filesystem unusable until reboot - and therefore it is very hard for me to do a full backup of the data prior to changing the disk. My current kernel is 3.2.0-8-generic from Ubuntu/precise (based on linux 3.2-final) but I

Hello, I'd like to read superblock's information on Redhat 7.3, but I don't know how to do it. For example, Input : "/dev/sdj2" Output : ext2_super_block struct's s_wtime (I saw it at "/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h") Input : "/dev/sdj1" Output : ext3_super_block struct's s_wtime (I saw it at

On 06/21/2011 01:15 PM, Jan Stilow wrote: > Hello, > > Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek <at> gentoo.org> writes: >> [...] >> >> Every few minutes, (I guess) when applications do fsync (firefox, >> xchat, vim, etc), all applications that use fsync() hang for several >> seconds, and applications that use general IO suffer extreme >> slowdowns.

Hi, I have setup about a year ago a BTRFS RAID 1 filesystem on two 2TB Western Digital WD20EARS hard drives and I have created subvolumes that I mount regularly as I need them. I put mostly music, videos and various files on them as well as some Git bare repositories for my work files but for the last couple of weeks, there seems to be some activity happening on the drives for a few minutes and

My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of seeing 4 devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using qlogic driver that is bulitin to the OS. Has any one seen this kind of situation? Paras -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have 4 ST2000DL003-9VT166 (2Tbyte) disks in a RAID 5 array. Because of the size I built them as a GPT partitioned disk. They were originally built on a CentOS 5.x machine but more recently plugged into a CentOS 6.2 machine where they were detected just fine e.g. % parted /dev/sdj print Model: ATA ST2000DL003-9VT1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdj: 2000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B

Hi All :) I am currently involved in a project in which there is a SAN array (Sun Storagetek 2540) which exports LUNs for some servers with Centos 5.2 x86. I will be performing a migration to Centos 5.9 x86_64 in some time and am gathering needed info now :) I am trying to find the place in the OS where there is the information about LUN mappings to /dev/ devices. For example on array level I