similar to: [PATCH] Btrfs: handle NFS lookups properly

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Btrfs: handle NFS lookups properly"

2008 Jun 24
1
[RFC][PATCH] btrfs orphan code
Hello, I want to throw this out here now that I''ve got most of the heavy lifting done for this code to make sure what I''m doing is ok for now. I''ve added an ORPHAN_DIR item key to have a hidden dir per root. Right now it just does it for whatever the default root is on mount, but I''m going to fix that to do the orphan dir check/creation on lookup of a
2013 Mar 15
0
[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: add skinny metadata support to progs V3
This fixes up the progs to properly deal with skinny metadata. This adds the -x option to mkfs and btrfstune for enabling the skinny metadata option. This also makes changes to fsck so it can properly deal with the skinny metadata entries. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- V2->V3: update the mkfs.btrfs man page with the new option This is based on
2011 Aug 23
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix an oops when deleting snapshots
We can reproduce this oops via the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb7 $ mount /dev/sdb7 /mnt/btrfs $ for ((i=0; i<3; i++)); do btrfs sub snap /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/s_$i; done $ rm -fr /mnt/btrfs/* $ rm -fr /mnt/btrfs/* then we''ll get ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2264! [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa05578c7>] btrfs_rmdir+0xf7/0x1b0
2010 Apr 08
2
ENOTEMPTY on "rm -rf" for snapshot and subvolume
Hi Everyone, Recently i created a snapshot of an existing volume which had some amount of data. Now that after creating the snapshot i have tried deleting the same snapshot. But i am getting ENOTEMPTY for "rmdir". But when i see the actual files inside are deleted not the parent directory. From the code it looks like if (inode->i_size >
2008 Oct 27
0
[PATCH 3/4] update nodatacow code
Hello, This patch simplifies the nodatacow checker. If all references were created after the latest snapshot, then we can avoid COW safely. This patch also updates run_delalloc_nocow to do more fine-grained checking. Regards Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 3/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 4/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 3/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2008-10-27 16:31:51.000000000 +0800 +++
2010 Sep 03
0
[PATCH 1/2] btrfs: document where we use BUG_ON instead of error handling
Document those places in the btrfs code which are BUGing on non-fatal error conditions that should be handled by proper error paths. This makes it easier to distinguish between what needs fixing versus which BUG_ON''s we might want to keep (to trap code bugs, unexpected inconsistencies, etc). Do this with a trivial macro, ''btrfs_fixable_bug_on'' which just defines to
2010 Oct 25
2
[PATCH] Btrfs: allow subvol deletion by unprivileged user with -o user_subvol_rm_allowed
Add a mount option user_subvol_rm_allowed that allows users to delete a (potentially non-empty!) subvol when they would otherwise we allowed to do an rmdir(2). We duplicate the may_delete() checks from the core VFS code to implement identical security checks (minus the directory size check). Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 + fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |
2012 May 27
0
[RFC PATCH] Decrease Metadata Fragment Using A Caterpillar Band Method
I made an attempt to partly decrease fragment by using a preallocated area of multiple size of a std blocksize for a tree block when it is COWed. The basic idea is that if any a tree block need to be created, we offer, say, 2 or 4 multiples of a std blocksize for it, then use the first block in the continuous blocks. When this block need a cow in the future, a new free block in these continuous
2002 Sep 13
0
rref() for R
Has anyone coded a rref() in R/S? rref() is MatLab's routine for producing a Row-Reduced Echelon Form of a matrix. -R -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !)
2015 Oct 27
3
Secure dynamic update failure with internal DNS
Hello, At one point secure dynamic updates worked. Now I require 'allow dns updates = nonsecure' for dynamic updates to work. I can't seem to find any trace of updates being performed in the samba logs or Windows. I've hit a wall and can't seem to progress. Since I couldn't pull anything from the logs I decided to run 'nsupdate -g -d -D -L 10'. This was
2020 Jul 02
0
samab-4.10 nsupdate
This is all the diagnostic information I can think of at the moment: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: administrator at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA Issued Expires Principal Jul 2 10:35:11 2020 Jul 2 20:35:11 2020 krbtgt/BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA at BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# grep nsup
2009 Nov 12
0
[PATCH 03/12] Btrfs: Rewrite btrfs_drop_extents
Rewrite btrfs_drop_extents by using btrfs_duplicate_item, so we can avoid calling lock_extent within transaction. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 7 +- fs/btrfs/file.c | 659 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 27 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +- 5 files changed, 277
2009 May 12
0
[PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: mixed back ref support
This patch adds mixed back ref support for btrfs programs. The mixed back ref is a new disk format. back compatilibity is still not implemented. To try the new disk format, you need fresh formatted btrfs. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp btrfs-progs-unstable/crc32c.h btrfs-progs-2/crc32c.h --- btrfs-progs-unstable/crc32c.h 2008-09-30 16:50:58.898877720 +0800
2009 Aug 24
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: proper metadata -ENOSPC handling
This patch finally gives us full proper -ENOSPC handling for btrfs. Now whenever you do a btrfs_start_transaction, you must specify the number of items you are planning to add/delete/modify. The worst case number of blocks that could be modified by changing that number of items will be calculated and checked against the amount of free space in the space_info where the root you are modifying
2010 Dec 16
2
[BUG?] There is a possibility that 'i_ino' overflows
Hi, In btrfs, inode number is increased each time a new file or directory is made. Therefore, if the making deletion of the file is repeated, value of ''i_ino'' increases rapidly. For example, inode number changes as follows. $ touch foo $ ls -i foo 266 foo $ rm foo $ touch bar $ ls -i bar 267 bar $ And then, length of ''i_ino'' and
2008 Jul 20
26
[PATCH] NFS support for btrfs - v2
Hi, Here''s an implementation of NFS support for btrfs. It does not work in one particular case as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg00298.html. This uses the btrfs_iget helper introduced previously. Comments ? --- Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com> diff -r 3f0eee804974 Makefile --- a/Makefile Thu Jun 26 10:34:20 2008 -0400
2009 Aug 21
0
[GIT PULL] btrfs rb corruption fix
Hi Linus, Nick found a bad rb tree corruption problem in btrfs with fsx. It would be nice to have this in 2.6.31, so please pull. Thanks! git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git btrfs From: Nick Piggin (1): btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption fs/btrfs/inode.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
2011 May 27
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: try to only do one btrfs_search_slot in do_setxattr
I''ve been watching how many btrfs_search_slot()''s we do and I noticed that when we create a file with selinux enabled we were doing 2 each time we initialize the security context. That''s because we lookup the xattr first so we can delete it if we''re setting a new value to an existing xattr. But in the create case we don''t have any xattrs, so it is
2012 Sep 13
0
[PATCH] btrfs: return EPERM upon rmdir on a subvolume
A subvolume cannot be deleted via rmdir, but the error code ENOTEMPTY is confusing. Return EPERM instead, as this is not permitted. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index a4167ef..a67dadd 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@
2006 Oct 31
3
ocfs2 error messages
I received the following error messages in the system logs. Is this anything to be concerned with? kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_populate_inode:234 ERROR: Invalid dinode: i_ino=1293597, i_blkno=1293597, signature = INODE01, flags = 0x0 kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_read_locked_inode:389 ERROR: populate inode failed! i_blkno=1293597, i_ino=1293597 kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_iget:131 ERROR: status = -116