similar to: Poor creat/delete files performance

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.16 is available for download, please see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ for download links and project information. v0.16 has a shiny new disk format, and is not compatible with filesystems created by older Btrfs releases. But, it should be the fastest Btrfs yet, with a wide variety of scalability fixes and new features. There were quite a few contributors this time

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to Chris, I''ve also updated the integration branch to match that. It''s available from: http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20110630 The shortlog of 17 patches in this branch beyond the ones I''ve sent to Chris is below. Hugo. Andreas Philipp (1): print parent

Hi gang, I was a little surprised to see that patch go by recently which fixed an endian bug. I went to see how sparse checking looked and it was.. broken. I got it going again in my Fedora environment. Most of the patches are just cleanups, but there *were* three real bugs lurking in all that sparse warning spam. So I maintain that it''s worth our time to keep it going and fix

I''ve just pushed out a new integration branch to my git repo. This is purely bugfix patches -- there are no new features in this issue of the integration branch. I''ve got a stack of about a dozen more patches with new features in them still to go. I''ll be working on those tomorrow. As always, there''s minimal testing involved here, but it does at least compile on

Hello, I''ve just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git However, when I come to make it fails like so: gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsctl.c gcc -g -Werror -Os -o btrfsctl btrfsctl.o ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

Here are 3 patches to avoid undesired aborts of mkfs.btrfs. These are based on top of Chris''s btrfs-progs.git: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git Thanks, H.Seto Hidetoshi Seto (3): btrfs-progs: error if device for mkfs is too small btrfs-progs: error if device have no space to make primary chunks btrfs-progs: calculate available

Hello, This is the userspace part of restriper, rebased onto the new progs infrastructure. Restriper commands are located under ''balance'' prefix, which is now the top level command group. However to not confuse existing users ''balance'' prefix is also available under ''filesystem'': btrfs [filesystem] balance start btrfs [filesystem] balance

NOTE: in order to apply this patch you should: git mv btrfsck.c cmd-fsck.c This patch moves btrfsck in to "btrfs fsck". It also adds support for symlinks to the btrfs binary to retain compablity, =) I think something should be done to the help description but i''m not sure what... Anyway, feedback is welcome. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Hello, Ok here are all my fsync changes, including the fix for the put_transaction stuff that I posted earlier. I figure it'll be easier to just commit it as one thing then each individual peice. The additional thing that I did was add a radix tree that tracks the current outstanding transactions. I also added a field to the in memory btrfs inode that keeps track of the last transaction

While testing with my buffer read fio jobs[1], I find that btrfs does not perform well enough. Here is a scenario in fio jobs: We have 4 threads, "t1 t2 t3 t4", starting to buffer read a same file, and all of them will race on add_to_page_cache_lru(), and if one thread successfully puts its page into the page cache, it takes the responsibility to read the page''s data. And

Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> $ LDFLAGS=-static make gcc -lpthread -g -O0 -o btrfs btrfs.o btrfs_cmds.o scrub.o \ ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o print-tree.o root-tree.o dir-item.o file-item.o inode-item.o inode-map.o crc32c.o rbtree.o extent-cache.o extent_io.o volumes.o utils.o btrfs-list.o btrfslabel.o -static -luuid scrub.o: In function

Setting subvolume/snapshot readonly has been missing for a long time. With this patch, we can set a subvolume/snapshot readonly via: o btrfs subvolume set-ro <path> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- cmds-subvolume.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ioctl.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Some programs like btrfsck should not be run on a mounted filesystem. This patch adds a check in btrfs_open_devices() for the mount status of every device belonging to the filesystem. The function check_mount() gets improved support for loopback devices. It now detects if the program is run on the file that is being used by the loopback device. Signed-off-by: Andi Drebes

Hi All, the following patches implement the recursively snapshotting and deleting of a subvolume. To snapshot recursively you must pass the -R switch: # btrfs subvolume create sub1 Create subvolume ''./sub1'' # btrfs subvolume create sub1/sub2 Create subvolume ''sub1/sub2'' # btrfs subvolume snapshot -R sub1 sub1-snap Create a snapshot of

There is a missing dependency: liblzo2-dev Without it, the make fails with: ~/tmp$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git ~/tmp$ cd btrfs-progs ~/tmp/btrfs-progs$ sudo apt-get install uuid-dev libattr1-dev zlib 1g-dev libacl1-dev e2fslibs-dev libblkid-dev ~/tmp/btrfs-progs$ make [CC] ctree.o [CC] disk-io.o [CC] radix-tree.o

This is the next patch series for scrub userland tools. Change log v1->v2: - commands now reachable as "btrfs scrub ..." instead of "btrfs filesystem scrub ..." - ability to scrub a single device instead of a whole file system - superfluous command line options removed - resume is now a separate command ("scrub resume") instead of "scrub start -r" -

Hi, Here''s an implementation of NFS support for btrfs. It does not work in one particular case as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg00298.html. This uses the btrfs_iget helper introduced previously. Comments ? --- Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com> diff -r 3f0eee804974 Makefile --- a/Makefile Thu Jun 26 10:34:20 2008 -0400