similar to: Unable to remove failing drive from storage pool

I have a corrupted multi-device file system that got corrupted ages ago (as I recall, one of the drives stopped responding, causing btrfs to panic). I am hoping to recover some of the data. For what it''s worth, here is the dmesg output from trying to mount the file system on a 3.0 kernel: device label Media devid 6 transid 816153 /dev/sdq device label Media devid 7 transid 816153

I ran into a panic while running find -xdev | xargs brtfs fi defrag ''{}''. I don''t remember the exact command because the history was not saved. I also started and stopped it a few times however. The kernel logs were on a different filesystem. Here is the kern.log:http://fpaste.org/9383/36729191/ My setup is two 2TB hard drives in raid 1. They are both sata drives so

Hi People, I have some issues with routing ipv6 to my kvm guests. I use a bridge interface with bridge-utils like recommended in the most howtos. Bridge conf: http://fpaste.org/hh9U/ ip -6 route show output: http://fpaste.org/c5Rd/ sysctl.conf: http://fpaste.org/oMjD/ Thanks for your help in advance. If you need more informations just let me know. David Hackl

For some asynchronous threads, such as submit worker and cache worker, we limit their thread pool size when mounting. So we also need to do such things when remounting. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index 83d6f9f..a58e834 100644 ---

Hello Everyone, I am using this bash script to pull resource id http://fpaste.org/84173/51169913/ this whole macro http://fpaste.org/84174/51176013/ that what I see when dialplan ran Executing [s at macro-missed-call-in:3] Set("SIP/babytel-00000022", "RES=9c32ecc4 -- ") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-missed-call-in:4] GotoIf("SIP/babytel-00000022",

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:48 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > On 08/09/2017 10:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > If it's a bad sector problem, you'd write to sector 17066160 and see if > the > > drive complies or spits back a write error. It looks like a bad sector in > > that the same LBA is reported each time but I've only ever

Hello! I have a 1 TB ext4 drive that''s quite full (~50 GB free space, though I could free up another 100 GB or so if necessary) and two empty 0.5 TB drives. Is it possible to get another 1 TB drive and combine the four drives to a btrfs raid10 setup without (if all goes well) losing my data? Regards, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

I am having an issue with Megacli when adding or removing virtual disks. I will post a link to fpaste that has the issue shown. In brief whenever i add, or remove, a virtual disk via MegaCli the attempt succeeds and the adapter is configured but the OS remounts dm-0 in read only. dm-0 is my root lv. This issue does not happen if i boot into the default, non Xen, CentOS kernel. On stock

Hello. I''ve built a kernel from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git (Date: Fri Nov 19 19:46:45 2010 -0800) and got a kernel oops when tried to access to unplugged, but mounted external usb storage formatted with JFS. Steps to reproduce: mkfs.jfs /dev/sdb1 (unpluggable USB hard drive) mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/drive cd /mnt/drive touch test sync

Hi all, I have a question about replacing a drive in raid10 (and linux kernel 3.8.4). A bad disk was physical removed from the server. After this a new disk was added with "btrfs device add /dev/sdg /btrfs" to the raid10 btrfs FS. After this the server was rebooted and I mounted the filesystem in degraded mode. It seems that a previous started balance continued. At this point I want to

I''ve been experimenting lately with btrfs RAID1 implementation and have to say that it is performing quite well, but there are few problems: * when I purposefully damage partitions on which btrfs stores data (for example, by changing the case of letters) it will read the other copy and return correct data. It doesn''t report in dmesg this fact every time, but it does

The annual Linux Storage, Filesystem and Memory Management Summit for 2013 will be held on April 18th and 19th following the Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit at Parc 55 Hotel in San Francisco, CA: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/collaboration-summit https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/lsfmm-summit We''d therefore like to issue a call for agenda proposals that are

Hi, Any step by step guide for setting up fpaste-server on CentOS 5.8? Regards Kaushal

Hi I am trying to build nagios rpm from nagios.spec file on CentOS 5.8. I am getting into issues. nagios.spec http://fpaste.org/crOs/ rpmbuild -ba nagios.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.36485 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf nagios-3.4.1 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/nagios-3.4.1.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '['

On 08/13/2013 06:31 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > Correct. That is a known problem since 2008: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453580 Thanks Laine for confirming it is a known issue. I googled it a lot but couldn't find that bugzilla entry. Do you know if this is still the case with the upcoming Fedora 20 & firewalld? (these rules are still being created)? >

Hi all, I used a kickstart script to setup a new machine of mine with RAID 1 (I couldn't get anaconda to create matching partition schemes). So I've now got /dev/sdg1 and /dev/sdh1 as 'bios_grub' (/dev/sd{a-f} are a separate array). 0 root at an-nas02:~# parted /dev/sdg print free Model: ATA ST3000NC000 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdg: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical):

Hello, I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from an old server to a new one. As I need to migrate dozens of accounts which take about 1G each, I need to do stateful sync to make my migration in two times : 1 - I run a : doveadm -D -o mail_fsync=never -o imapc_user=user1 at olddomain.fr sync -s "" -R -1 -u user1 at newdomain.fr imapc: > /tmp/firstsync.log 2>&1 my

On 08/13/2013 07:07 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 08/13/2013 06:31 AM, Laine Stump wrote: >> Correct. That is a known problem since 2008: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453580 > Thanks Laine for confirming it is a known issue. I googled it a lot but > couldn't find that bugzilla entry. > > Do you know if this is still the case with the

Hi, I have a set of servers whose system time is drifting. I am running ntp client on CentOS 5.8. My config is here -> http://fpaste.org/s55U/ Anything i am missing? Regards, Kaushal

I''ve just finished installing onto an OCZ Agilent v2 SSD with btrfs as filesystem. However to my surprise I''ve hit an ENOSPC condition one one of the partitions within less than a day of uptime, while the filesystem on that partition only reported 50% to be in use, which is far from the 75% limit people mention on the ML. Note that this occurs using a vanilla 2.6.32-rc5 kernel