similar to: Balance taking a lot longer than before

Hello everyone, I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. Gluster version is 3.7.3. My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. Rebooting Gluster nodes doesn't help. # gluster volume rebalance gsae_artifactory_cluster_storage start volume rebalance:

Hi Nithya, the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments. Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at

Hi Nithya, I see index in context: [2017-07-07 10:07:18.230202] E [MSGID: 106062] [glusterd-utils.c:7997:glusterd_volume_rebalance_use_rsp_dict] 0-glusterd: failed to get index I wonder if there is anything I can do to fix it. I was trying to strace gluster process but still have no clue what exactly is gluster index. Best regards, Szymon Miotk On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nithya

On 7 July 2017 at 15:42, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I have problem rebalancing Gluster volume. > Gluster version is 3.7.3. > My 1x3 replicated volume become full, so I've added three more bricks > to make it 2x3 and wanted to rebalance. > But every time I start rebalancing, it fails immediately. > Rebooting Gluster

Hi Szymon, I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you. In what context are you seeing index? Thanks, Nithya On 11 July 2017 at 01:15, Szymon Miotk <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large > attachments. > Could someone explain what is index in Gluster? > Unfortunately

After nearly 3 months, we have another preview release for GlusterD-2.0. The highlights for this release are, - GD2 now uses an auto scaling etcd cluster, which automatically selects and maintains the required number of etcd servers in the cluster. - Preliminary support for volume expansion has been added. (Note that rebalancing is not available yet) - An end to end functional testing framework

Just so I know. Is it correct to assume that this corruption issue is ONLY involved if you are doing rebalancing with sharding enabled. So if I am not doing rebalancing I should be fine? -bill On 10/3/2017 10:30 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Nithya Balachandran > <nbalacha at redhat.com <mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com>> wrote:

On 4 October 2017 at 23:34, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > Just so I know. > > Is it correct to assume that this corruption issue is ONLY involved if you > are doing rebalancing with sharding enabled. > > So if I am not doing rebalancing I should be fine? > That is correct. > -bill > > > > On 10/3/2017 10:30 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > >

I started rebalancing my 25x2 distributed-replicate volume two days ago. Since then, the memory usage of the rebalance processes has been steadily climbing by 1-2 megabytes per minute. Following http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/High_Memory_Usage, I tried "echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches". This had no effect on the processes' memory usage. Some of the

Dear glusterfs experts, Recently we have encountered a self-heal daemon crash issue after rebalanced volume. Crash stack bellow: +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ pending frames: patchset: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git signal received: 11 time of crash: 2013-03-14 16:33:50 configuration details: argp 1 backtrace 1 dlfcn 1 fdatasync 1 libpthread

Il 5 lug 2017 11:31 AM, "Kaushal M" <kshlmster at gmail.com> ha scritto: - Preliminary support for volume expansion has been added. (Note that rebalancing is not available yet) What do you mean with this? Any differences in volume expansion from the current architecture? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I started rebalancing my volume after updating from 3.2.7 to 3.3.1. After a few hours, I noticed a large number of failures in the rebalance status: > Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures > status > --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > ------------ > localhost 0 0Bytes 4288805

Hi all, Yesterday I converted my ext4 root and home partitions on my home machine to btrfs using btrfs-convert. After confirming that everything went well, I followed the wiki instructions to nuke the 'ext2_saved" subvolume, then defraggad and rebalanced. Everything went according to plan on my root partition, but my home partition claimed to have run out of space when rebalancing. I

I visited http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities which tells me to install the package yum-priorities available from extras. I try this and it fails. # yum install yum-priorities Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca * base: mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca * extras: mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca * updates:

Hello list, I have performed a fresh install (fully updated) of squeeze amd64 and installed the xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 package with all its dependencies. When I restart and tried to boot the linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (pvops style) kernel on bare-metal my laptop boots fine. When I use the hyper-visor on the system with the same linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 kernel, it hangs

Hello list, I have performed a fresh install (fully updated) of squeeze amd64 and installed the xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 package with all its dependencies. When I restart and tried to boot the linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (pvops style) kernel on bare-metal my laptop boots fine. When I use the hyper-visor on the system with the same linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 kernel, it hangs

I'm trying to determine which dovecot components to use and how to order them in the network path from client to mail store. If I have say 1,000 users, all stored in MySQL (or LDAP) and have 4 mail stores, configured into 2, 2 node pods. MS1 and MS2 are pod1 and are configured with replication (dsync) and host users 0-500. MS3 and MS4 are pod2 and are configured with replication between

Hello everyone I am not sure when this appeared (sometime post R 3.5.0 and after I switched to Mac OS Catalina). I do not think it happens on all platforms (e.g. seems to work on windows). But it seems that tkimage.create() no longer works on a Mac for all png files. (It does work for *some* old png files I have on disk but I have not been able to determine what is different about the

All, We currently have a Gluster installation which is made of 2 servers. Each server has 10 drives on ZFS. And I have a gluster mirror between these 2. The current config looks like: SERVER A-BRICK 1 replicated to SERVER B-BRICK 1 I now need to add more space and a third server. Before I do the changes, I want to know if this is a supported config. By adding a third server, I simply want to

I don't know what has changed with Catalina But I just tried my tk console from the shell command tkcon And got the following error. Here is my shell: $ tkcon dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib:/opt/X11/lib/libtk8.6.dylib Referenced from: /usr/local/bin/wish Reason: image not found Abort trap: 6 I don't know whether this is a red herring or not, but the