similar to: 2.6.33 high cpu usage

__napi_schedule might raise softirq but nothing causes do_softirq to trigger, so it does not in fact run. As a result, the error message "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08" sometimes occurs during boot of a KVM guest when the network service is started and we are oom: ... Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ] Bringing up interface eth0: Determining IP information for

__napi_schedule might raise softirq but nothing causes do_softirq to trigger, so it does not in fact run. As a result, the error message "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08" sometimes occurs during boot of a KVM guest when the network service is started and we are oom: ... Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ] Bringing up interface eth0: Determining IP information for

Going back to the "prioritizing aggregated DBs" thread from February 2020, I've got 390 Xapian shards for 130 public inboxes I want to search against(*). There's more on the horizon (we're expecting tens of thousands of public inboxes). After bumping RLIMIT_NOFILE and running ->add_database a bunch, the actual queries seem to be taking ~30s (not good :x). Now I'm

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net> wrote: > Just a heads up that I'm seeing major stability problems on these builds. > Didn't have console capture setup unfortunately, but have seen my test > hypervisor hard lock twice over the weekend. > > This is with xpti being used, rather than the shim. Thanks for the heads-up. It's been

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

G'Day Tanya, Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6? http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266

hello, i'm pete ,how can i order rows of matrix by max to min value? I have a matrix of membership degrees, with 82 (i) rows and K coloumns, K are clusters. I need first and second largest elements of the i-th row. for example 1 0.66 0.04 0.01 0.30 2 0.02 0.89 0.09 0.00 3 0.06 0.92 0.01 0.01 4 0.07 0.71 0.21 0.01 5 0.10 0.85 0.04 0.01 6 0.91 0.04 0.02 0.02 7 0.00 0.01 0.98 0.00 8 0.02

Dear anybody I am running Fedora Core 6 with the latest version of R. When I try to install the package RMySQL I get this message: * Installing *source* package 'RMySQL' ... creating cache ./config.cache checking how to run the C preprocessor... /lib/cpp checking for compress in -lz... no checking for getopt_long in -lc... no checking for

Hi all. I've updated google-chrome to recent version and it gets unbooted, when I fired google-chrome up I got messages like these: /usr/bin/google-chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by /usr/bin/google-chrome) /usr/bin/google-chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by /usr/bin/google-chrome) /opt/google/chrome/chrome:

Should I submit this as a bug report? --- reg-tests-3.Rout.save Thu Jul 3 09:55:40 2003 +++ reg-tests-3.Rout Sun Nov 23 13:10:57 2003 @@ -1,17 +1,18 @@ -R : Copyright 2003, The R Development Core Team -Version 1.8.0 Under development (unstable) (2003-07-03) +R : Copyright 2003, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing +Version 1.8.1 (2003-11-21), ISBN 3-900051-00-3 R is free software and

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

List users, Using Asterisk in an inbound call center environment has led us to pushing the limits of vertical scaling. In order to treat each caller fairly and to utilize our agents as efficiently as possible, it is desirable to configure each client as a single queue. As far as I know, Asterisk's queues cannot be distributed across servers, so the size of the largest queue we service

Hi R Helpers, Is it possible to interpret the top level of the list as a date after downloading all the option chain data for a ticker? For example, after I run aapl_total<-getOptionChain("AAPL", NULL) the top descriptor of the lists is a date (Mar.09.2018, Mar.23.2018, etc.). So if want to subset down to those parts of the list that correspond to say, (expiration)

Hi, I often need to take columns from two data.frames and 'splice' them together (alternately taking a column from the first data frame, then from the second). For example: x <- table(sample(letters[1:9], 100, replace=TRUE), sample(letters[1:4], 100, replace=TRUE)) y <- prop.table(x) splice <- function (x, y) { z <- matrix(rep(NA, (ncol(x) * 2) * nrow(x)), nrow

I have a text file that has semi-colon separated values. The table is nearly 10,000 by 585. The files looks as follows: ******************************************* First line: Skip this line Second line: skip this line Third line: skip this line variable1 Variable2 Variable3 Variable4 Unit1 Unit2 Unit3 10 0.1 0.01 0.001 20

Hi, I have a 3d array as below, I want to make this array to a matrix of p=50(rows) and n=20(columns) with the coverage values . The code before the array is: library(binom) Loading required package: lattice pi.seq<-seq(from = 0.01, to = 0.5, by = 0.01) no.seq<-seq(from = 5, to = 100, by = 5) cp.all = binom.coverage( p = pi.seq, n = no.seq , conf.level = 0.95, method = "exact")

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

Dear Group, I have the following data matrix which is a timeseries. > dput(tData) structure(list(A = c(0.2, 0.13, 0.05, 0.1, 0.02, 0.18, 0.09, 0.06, 0.13), B = c(0.15, 0.06, 0.09, 0.02, 0.03, 0.12, 0.01, 0.15, 0.06), C = c(-0.1, 0, -0.07, -0.06, -0.05, -0.05, -0.06, -0.08, -0.07), D = c(-0.15, -0.05, -0.1, -0.03, -0.13, -0.04, -0.1, -0.04, -0.15), E = c(-0.17, -0.16, -0.08, -0.07, -0.09,