similar to: btrfs for clustered/distributed storadge (Isilon, Panasas, ceph)

Hi, We are in the process of testing a migration of our current setup which contains Samba 4 as Classic DC with LDAP backend, Isilon OneFS bulk storage serving NFS/SMB shares and Windows/Mac/Linux clients to a more modern Samba 4 AD. We need to migrate to Samba AD because of Windows 10 and macos 10.13.x (and for several other reasons). But we run into an issue with authenticating the clients

I am wondering if anyone has any experience with the Isilon OneFS storage system (http://www.isilon.com/) using NFS to host storage for Dovecot. Thanks

Hi, On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 12:28 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:24:03 +0000 > "Deventer-2, M.S.J. van via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we now have an old Windows NT4.0 domain served by Samba 4.2.x > > (using > > Samba and LDAP) and want to move to Windows AD. > > The reason

Hi everyone. Since yesterday we started experiencing very weird problem with our samba AD server and our Isilon storage. This seems to affect only the storage, as our Windows workstations are fine. Suddenly the storage lost connectivity to the AD and so it's unable to provide access to the SMB shares. I've tried rejoining without success and whatnot. Today I even created second AD dc for

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:24:03 +0000 "Deventer-2, M.S.J. van via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > we now have an old Windows NT4.0 domain served by Samba 4.2.x (using > Samba and LDAP) and want to move to Windows AD. > The reason we need to do that is because of the clients (Windows 10 > and MacOS) and because of a third party device which does

2011/10/26 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote: >> >> > Christian, have you tweaked those settings in your ceph.conf?  It would be >> >> > something like ''journal dio = false''.  If not, can you verify that >> >> > directio shows true when the journal is initialized from your osd log?

Hi, we now have an old Windows NT4.0 domain served by Samba 4.2.x (using Samba and LDAP) and want to move to Windows AD. The reason we need to do that is because of the clients (Windows 10 and MacOS) and because of a third party device which does not want to talk to Samba AD (Isilon OneFS). I did a 'classicupgrade' to Samba AD from our Samba/LDAP config and then I use this guide :

I download the samba-3.5.3.tar and need to create the executables for Solaris 10. I do not have the gcc compiler and would like to use the SUNWspro/bin/cc compiler. What I need is a "MyConfigure" script that will create a usable Makefile. I don't need anything fancy like ldap, ads etc. I do have gnumake. For example what environment variables are necessary (PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH,

We're running dovecot 2.3.10 on two different servers (two different environments). Both very similarly configured (sendmail and procmail for mail delivery); same OS and patch levels. One environment has nearly 10,000 users and hasn't seen problems. The other environment has just a handful of users, but one user is very active with email and has a fairly complicated procmail

Hello Timo, I'm running a single instance of dovecot-2.1.15 on a single host running 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD amd64 mailboxes (Maildir), control files and indexes are on NFS (v3,tcp) mail_nfs_storage = yes lock_method = fcntl [didn't touch the following] # Mail index files also exist in NFS. Setting this to yes requires # mmap_disable=yes and

Hi Chris- Here''s a simpler version of the patch that drops the unrelated sync_fs stuff. thanks- sage The ''flushoncommit'' mount option forces any data dirtied by a write in a prior transaction to commit as part of the current commit. This makes the committed state a fully consistent view of the file system from the application''s perspective (i.e., it

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:47:35PM -0500, Joshua Dotson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph > RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC > isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. > That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users- > bounces@redhat.com] Namens Björn Lässig > Verzonden: vrijdag 27 mei 2016 10:10 > Aan: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Onderwerp: [libvirt-users] migrate local storage to ceph | exchanging the > storage system > > TLDR: Why is virsh migrate --persistent --live domain >

Greetings all! I am in the process of deploying a POC around SAMBA and CEPH. I'm having some trouble locating concise instructions on how to get them to work together (without having to mount CEPH to the computer first and then exporting that mount via SAMBA). Right now, my stopper is trying to locate ceph.so for x64 CentOS 6.5. [2014/02/26 15:05:23.923617, 0]

On 21/09/2020 08:55, Jonas via samba wrote: > Hello > > > Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: > > > ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available > > > Here is my samba configuration: >

Hi, some time back we had similar discussions when we, as an email provider, discussed to move away from traditional NAS/NFS storage to Ceph. The problem with POSIX file systems and dovecot is that e.g. with mdbox only around ~20% of the IO operations are READ/WRITE, the rest are metadata IOs. You will not change this with using CephFS since it will basically behave the same way as e.g. NFS. We

Hello Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available Here is my samba configuration: [global] clustering = Yes netbios name = FSCLUSTER realm = INT.EXAMPLE.COM registry

On 06/07/2013 04:18 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Jun 7, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com> wrote: > >> On 06/07/2013 02:41 PM, John Nielsen wrote: >>> I am running some qemu-kvm virtual machines via libvirt using Ceph RBD as the back-end storage. Today I was testing an update to libvirt-1.0.6 on one of my hosts and discovered that it includes this

Hello Jack, yes, I imagine I'll have to do some work on tuning the block size on cephfs. Thanks for the advise. I knew that using mdbox, messages are not removed but I though that was true in sdbox too. Thanks again. We'll soon do benchmarks of sdbox vs mdbox over cephfs with bluestore backend. We'll have to do some some work on how to simulate user traffic, for writes and readings.

Hello everybody, virt-install --version 1.4.0 How do I create a ceph network disk with virt-install without having to edit it? <disk type='network' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <auth username='libvirt'> <secret type='ceph' uuid='ec9be0c4-a60f-490e-af83-f0f27aaf48c9'/>