similar to: [RFC 03/12 RESEND PATCH] Btrfs: Reorder __btrfs_map_block to make code more efficient.

We discussed using the top bits of the chunk type field field to store a number of redundant disks -- so instead of RAID5, RAID6, etc., we end up with a single ''RAID56'' flag, and the amount of redundancy is stored elsewhere. This attempts it, but I hate it and don''t really want to do it. The type field is designed as a bitmask, and _used_ as a bitmask in a number of

The biggest one is a fix for fstrim, and there''s a fix for on-disk free space cache. Others are small fixes and cleanups. The last three have been sent weeks ago. The patchset is also available in this repo: git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git for-chris Note there''s a small confict with Al Viro''s vfs changes. Li Zefan (11): Btrfs: add pinned extents to

Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply

Currently mkfs in response to mkfs.btrfs -d raid10 dev1 dev2 instead of telling "you can''t do that" creates a SINGLE on two devices, and only rebalance can transform it to raid0. Generally, it never warns users about decisions it makes and it''s not at all obvious which profile it picks when. Fix this by checking the number of effective devices and reporting back

Hello, I have a question regarding "btrfs filesystem df"output. # btrfs fi df /mnt/test Data: total=3.01GB, used=512.19MB System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=4.00KB System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00 <= What this means? For what is used? I''ve never seen this incremented Metadata, DUP: total=2.50GB, used=676.00KB Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00

Fix various messages to include newline and module prefix. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 8 ++++---- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++--- fs/btrfs/zlib.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index c5f8fca..c0b8727 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++

Hi, the $subj warning appears sometimes in syslog, in my case when xfstests/209 runs looped. The minimal reproducer is looped mkfs+mount. The message comes from disk-io.c btree_readpage_end_io_hook(): 581 if (check_tree_block_fsid(root, eb)) { 582 printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO "btrfs bad fsid on block %llu\n", 583 (unsigned long

When building on ppc64 I hit a number of warnings in printf: btrfs-map-logical.c:69: error: format ‘%Lu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘u64’ Fix them. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> --- diff --git a/btrfs-list.c b/btrfs-list.c index 93766a8..c602b87 100644 --- a/btrfs-list.c +++ b/btrfs-list.c @@ -249,7 +249,8 @@ static int

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, please apply the following patch to fix building btfs-progs on alpha and ia64 from: git://git.debian-maintainers.org/git/daniel/btrfs-tools.git - ---snip--- commit 561e811286c52f141cf4944fe219e6b61fab0ac9 Author: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> Date: Sat Jun 5 08:53:46 2010 +0200 Properly cast and avoid compiler warnings,

Changes v1-v2: - Remove restriction that BTRFS_IOC_GET_DEVICE_STATS is a privileged operation - Cast u64 to unsigned long long for printf() Changes v2-v3: - Rebased on Chris'' current master Changes v3-v4: - Add padding at end of ioctl structure Changes v4-v5: - The statistic members in the ioctl are now organized as an array of 64 bit values. Symbolic names for the array indexes

$./mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd -b 2M [...] mkfs.btrfs: volumes.c:845: btrfs_alloc_chunk: Assertion `!(ret)'' failed. Aborted (core dumped). We should return error to userspace instead of the above. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> --- mkfs.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- volumes.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git

The current btrfs support did not handled multiple stripes stored in chunk items, hence skipping the physical addresses that were needed to do the mapping. Besides, the chunk tree may contain DEV_ITEM keys which store information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them instead of finishing lookup. The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm

The current btrfs support did not handled multiple stripes stored in chunk items, hence skipping the physical addresses that were needed to do the mapping. Besides, the chunk tree may contain DEV_ITEM keys which store information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them instead of finishing lookup. The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm

Hi, I recently compiled dovecot-2.1.1 on Solaris 10 with Sun Studio, but when I want to compile Sieve for this version (dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-0.3.0) I get an error: "sieve.c", line 578: identifier redeclared: sieve_multiscript_run and I see that declaration in sieve.h is different from definition in sieve.c, so compilation process fails with SunStudio cc compiler. I have done a

Document those places in the btrfs code which are BUGing on non-fatal error conditions that should be handled by proper error paths. This makes it easier to distinguish between what needs fixing versus which BUG_ON''s we might want to keep (to trap code bugs, unexpected inconsistencies, etc). Do this with a trivial macro, ''btrfs_fixable_bug_on'' which just defines to

If there is no free space, the free space allocator will try to get space from the block group with the degenerated profile. For example, if there is no free space in the RAID1 block groups, the allocator will try to allocate space from the DUP block groups. And besides that, the space reservation has the similar behaviour: if there is no enough space in the space cache to reserve, it will reserve

(cc''ing btrfs people) On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:33:20AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812484d3>] [<ffffffff812484d3>] ftrace_raw_event_block_bio_complete+0x73/0xf0 ... > [<ffffffff811b6c10>] bio_endio+0x80/0x90 > [<ffffffffa0790d26>] btrfs_end_bio+0xf6/0x190 [btrfs] > [<ffffffff811b6bcd>] bio_endio+0x3d/0x90 >

This deadlock comes from xfstests 251. We''ll hold the chunk_mutex throughout the whole of a chunk allocation. But if we find that we''ve used up system chunk space, we need to allocate a new system chunk, but this will lead to a recursion of chunk allocation and end up with a deadlock on chunk_mutex. So instead we need to allocate the system chunk first if we find we''re

Currently there are error paths in btrfs_rm_device() where EINVAL is returned telling the user they passed an invalid argument even though they passed a valid device. Change to return EPERM instead as the operation is not permitted. Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

The current btrfs support did not handled multiple stripes stored in chunk items, hence skipping the physical addresses that were needed to do the mapping. Besides, the chunk tree may contain DEV_ITEM keys which store information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them instead of finishing lookup. The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm