similar to: fsck.btrfs assertion failure with large number of disks in fs

btrfs 0.19 Ubuntu 10.10 Linux linux 2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 11:55:36 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux I create a new btrfs on a 200GB disk with one partition. I mount the partition. I create a snapshot of that partition. I unmount the partition. I run btrfsck and it says I have an "unresolved ref" error. If I create two snaps, I get three errors. If I create three snaps, I

(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302 > > Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb > Product: IO/Storage > Version: 2.5 > Kernel

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

Hi, I reported a bug to anaconda (rhbz 901905), but it might be btfs related. Anaconda does this: 18:49:10,317 INFO program: Running... mkfs.btrfs --data=single --label=fedora /dev/vdb1 /dev/vdc1 /dev/vdd1 /dev/vde1 18:49:10,742 INFO program: 18:49:10,746 INFO program: WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL 18:49:10,746 INFO program: WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before

Hi, I try to format a USB memory with a Btrfs. I can format it with mkfs.btrfs without problems. But; when I try to mount it, it fails to mount with the below error messages. But the USB memory works fine with other filesystems (ext4, XFS etc.). So, the hardware is not faulty. tarkane@tarkane:~$ sudo mkfs.btrfs -d single -n 4096 /dev/sdb1 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.18-26-g0030f1d IS EXPERIMENTAL

Hi Rich, A compiling error occurs here, File "../ocaml/guestfs.ml", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: The implementation ../ocaml/guestfs.ml does not match the interface ../ocaml/guestfs.cmi: Values do not match: external mkfs_btrfs : t -> ?allocstart:int64 -> ?bytecount:int64 -> ?datatype:string ->

Add man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in Kept the name with the name in, so that further processing such as BUILD_DATE BUILD_VERSION etc. could be included later. All man pages included in the man directory to avoid file cluttering. Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> --- man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0

Currently mkfs in response to mkfs.btrfs -d raid10 dev1 dev2 instead of telling "you can''t do that" creates a SINGLE on two devices, and only rebalance can transform it to raid0. Generally, it never warns users about decisions it makes and it''s not at all obvious which profile it picks when. Fix this by checking the number of effective devices and reporting back

We do log replay in a single transaction, so it''s not good to do unbound operations during replaying log. This patch makes orphan inodes cleanup executed after replaying log. It also avoid doing other unbound operations such as truncating a file during replaying log. These unbound operations are postponed to the orphan inode cleanup stage. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng

This fixes up the progs to properly deal with skinny metadata. This adds the -x option to mkfs and btrfstune for enabling the skinny metadata option. This also makes changes to fsck so it can properly deal with the skinny metadata entries. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- V2->V3: update the mkfs.btrfs man page with the new option This is based on

Since 2.6.29-rc1 contains btrfs I had to try it. However the loopback mount of my btrfs formatted file fails: user@host:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=btrfs.img bs=1MB count=512 user@host:~$ mkfs.btrfs btrfs.img fs created label (null) on btrfs.img nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 488.28MB Btrfs v0.16+da35ab2b0b54 user@host:~$ sudo mount -t btrfs -o loop btrfs.img /mnt/btrfs mount:

Hello all Support for Secure Remote Password (SRP) for OpenSSH was last discussed in 2004: http://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&w=2&r=1&s=SRP&q=b There's a SRP patch for OpenSSL that's about 2 years in the making: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1794 Tom Wu from Stanford has been working on that. Has anything changed since 2004 that would make inclusion

Check for the return value of ''open_ctree()'' before dereferencing it. Signed-off-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com> --- btrfs-image.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c index f2bbcc8..2a33a55 100644 --- a/btrfs-image.c +++ b/btrfs-image.c @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int create_metadump(const char *input, FILE *out,

Some programs like btrfsck should not be run on a mounted filesystem. This patch adds a check in btrfs_open_devices() for the mount status of every device belonging to the filesystem. The function check_mount() gets improved support for loopback devices. It now detects if the program is run on the file that is being used by the loopback device. Signed-off-by: Andi Drebes

Extend mkfs options to specify optional or potentially backwards incompatible features. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in | 9 ++++ mkfs.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in b/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in index a3f1503..548e754 100644 ---

Dear R-users, I’d like to make a nested anova on my data, and since I’m discovering both R and statistic, I’d like to be sure that I’m not doing something stupid. Here is my data: I’ve measured some variable responses (Y, for example leaf size) for different plants grown on three differing conditions (A, B and C). These plants come from two different species (sp1 and sp2) and within each species,

moved the node-,leaf-,sectorsize from btrfs_root to btrfs_fs_info since we don''t intend to allow different sizes between trees also removed sectorsize from btrfs_block_group_cache because it now can use the one in fs_info updated all uses accordingly please note in disk-io.c: -static int __setup_root(nodesize, leafsize, sectorsize, stripesize, - *root,

hi,sir I creat the filesystem with command mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda2, and it returns fs created label (null) on /dev/sda2 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 2.93GB then I mount the /dev/sda2 with command mount -t btrfs /dev/sda2 /btrfs/, it returns mount: /dev/sda2: can''t read superblock. Why? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Hello everyone. This is the support for default single-device configuration. Subvolumes are _allowed_. Transparent compression is not allowed. Leafsize != 4K is not allowed. Nodesize != 4K is not allowed. Grub-0.97+btrfs doesn''t understand exotic things like preallocated extents (e.g. files composed by fallocate(2), posix_fallocate(3)). Also grub-0.97 doesn''t check btrfs

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> 240f62c8756 replaced the node_lock with rcu_read_lock, but forgot to remove the actual lock in the data structure. Remove it here. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index