similar to: [PATCH 7/8] Make fallocate(2) more ENOSPC friendly

Even though we allocate more, we should be updating inode i_size as per the arguments passed Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- Changes from V1: We should update i_size only if actual_len and cur_offset are both larger than i_size. Otherwise if actual_len is < i_size and cur_offset > i_size we may end up setting wrong i_size value

Rewrite btrfs_drop_extents by using btrfs_duplicate_item, so we can avoid calling lock_extent within transaction. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 7 +- fs/btrfs/file.c | 659 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 27 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +- 5 files changed, 277

Pre-allocate space for data relocation. This can detect ENOPSC condition caused by fragmentation of free space. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 2/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 3/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 2/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-26 17:28:20.493839748 +0800 +++ 3/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-26 17:28:20.498830465 +0800 @@ -2419,6 +2419,9 @@ int btrfs_cont_expand(struct inode *inod

I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it''s data it won''t actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn''t check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn''t actually return anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look valid when it really isnt. Thanks, Signed-off-by:

We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. There are a lot of fixes in here to make this

We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. There are a lot of fixes in here to make this

This patch finally gives us full proper -ENOSPC handling for btrfs. Now whenever you do a btrfs_start_transaction, you must specify the number of items you are planning to add/delete/modify. The worst case number of blocks that could be modified by changing that number of items will be calculated and checked against the amount of free space in the space_info where the root you are modifying

The function - btrfs_cont_expand() forgot to close the transaction handle before it jump out the while loop. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 634dd797..ee57b40 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -3510,15

There is a typo in __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() where we set the i_size to actual_len/cur_offset, and then just set it to cur_offset again, and do the same with btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(). This fixes it back to keeping i_size in a local variable and then updating i_size properly. Tested this with xfs_io -F -f -c "falloc 0 1" -c "pwrite 0 1" foo stat''ing foo

Btrfs has always had these filler extent data items for holes in inodes. This has made somethings very easy, like logging hole punches and sending hole punches. However for large holey files these extent data items are pure overhead. So add an incompatible feature to no longer add hole extents to reduce the amount of metadata used by these sort of files. This has a few changes for logging and

Hi all - The following 9 patches add more error handling to the btrfs code: - Add btrfs_panic - Catch locking failures in {set,clear}_extent_bit - Push up set_extent_bit errors to callers - Push up lock_extent errors to callers - Push up clear_extent_bit errors to callers - Push up unlock_extent errors to callers - Make pin_down_extent return void - Push up btrfs_pin_extent errors to

Hello, This patch simplifies the nodatacow checker. If all references were created after the latest snapshot, then we can avoid COW safely. This patch also updates run_delalloc_nocow to do more fine-grained checking. Regards Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 3/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 4/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 3/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2008-10-27 16:31:51.000000000 +0800 +++

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. The core of this release is explicit back references for all metadata blocks, data extents, and directory items. These are a crucial building

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. The core of this release is explicit back references for all metadata blocks, data extents, and directory items. These are a crucial building

Balance will create reloc_root for each fs root, and it''s going to record last_snapshot to filter shared blocks. The side effect of setting last_snapshot is to break nocow attributes of files. So it turns out that checking last_snapshot does not always ensure that a node/leaf/file_extent is shared. That''s why shared node/leaf needs to search extent tree for number of

Andrew, can you please send this on to Linus and -stable ASAP? It's causing massive problems for our users. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:50:59PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Hi, > > commit c2c6ca4 (direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous > requests) introduced a bug whereby all O_DIRECT I/Os were submitted a > page at a time to the block layer. The problem is that the

Here are 3 patches to avoid undesired aborts of mkfs.btrfs. These are based on top of Chris''s btrfs-progs.git: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git Thanks, H.Seto Hidetoshi Seto (3): btrfs-progs: error if device for mkfs is too small btrfs-progs: error if device have no space to make primary chunks btrfs-progs: calculate available

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them

We''ve been hitting BUG()''s in btrfs_cont_expand and btrfs_fallocate and anywhere else that calls btrfs_get_extent while running xfstests 13 in a loop. This is because fiemap is calling btrfs_get_extent with non-sectorsize aligned offsets, which will end up adding mappings that are not sectorsize aligned, which will cause problems in some cases for subsequent calls to

Currently mkfs in response to mkfs.btrfs -d raid10 dev1 dev2 instead of telling "you can''t do that" creates a SINGLE on two devices, and only rebalance can transform it to raid0. Generally, it never warns users about decisions it makes and it''s not at all obvious which profile it picks when. Fix this by checking the number of effective devices and reporting back