Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Btrfs: optimize fsync for the single writer case"
2013 Jan 10
0
[PATCH 03/11] Btrfs: use atomic for fs_info->last_trans_log_full_commit
fs_info->last_trans_log_full_commit is a 64bits variant, we might get a
wrong value on the 32bit machines if we access it directly. Fix it by atomic
operation.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |
2011 Jun 21
19
[GIT PULL v3] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction
I''ve been working to try to improve the write-ahead log''s performance,
and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items,
especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file.
Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just
to log the part of inode that had changed since either the last log commit or
the last
2011 Aug 26
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: make some functions return void
The type of some functions that return only 0 is changed to ''void''.
In addition, the check on the return value in the caller of these
functions becomes unnecessary. So, these check is removed.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 17 ++++--------
fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 4 +-
fs/btrfs/compression.c | 14 ++++------
2012 Apr 20
44
Ceph on btrfs 3.4rc
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata
is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning
that seems to occur from time to time:
[87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103
2013 Oct 25
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: return an error from btrfs_wait_ordered_range
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it''s data it
won''t actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn''t
check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn''t actually return
anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look
valid when it really isnt. Thanks,
Signed-off-by:
2011 Jun 09
2
[PATCH] Btrfs: turn to readonly if btrfs_start_transaction() fails
When btrfs_start_transaction() fails, we should call btrfs_std_error()
properly for filesystem to readonly.
(in this patch, forced readonly framework is used)
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 1 +
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 +++-
2012 Jun 21
0
[RFC PATCH V2] Btrfs: introduce extent buffer cache for each i-node
This patch introduce extent buffer cache for every i-node. By this
way, we can save the search time and reduce the lock contention of the root
because we needn''t search the item from the root of b+ tree.
Implementation:
- add two pointers of extent buffer into btrfs_inode struct, one for
nodes/leaves of fs/file tree, the other for nodes/leaves of the log tree.
- add a variant to tell
2013 Nov 12
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: incompatible format change to remove hole extents V4
Btrfs has always had these filler extent data items for holes in inodes. This
has made somethings very easy, like logging hole punches and sending hole
punches. However for large holey files these extent data items are pure
overhead. So add an incompatible feature to no longer add hole extents to
reduce the amount of metadata used by these sort of files. This has a few
changes for logging and
2011 Aug 15
9
[patch v2 0/9] btrfs: More error handling patches
Hi all -
The following 9 patches add more error handling to the btrfs code:
- Add btrfs_panic
- Catch locking failures in {set,clear}_extent_bit
- Push up set_extent_bit errors to callers
- Push up lock_extent errors to callers
- Push up clear_extent_bit errors to callers
- Push up unlock_extent errors to callers
- Make pin_down_extent return void
- Push up btrfs_pin_extent errors to
2011 Mar 08
6
[PATCH v1 0/6] btrfs: scrub
This series adds an initial implementation for scrub. It works quite
straightforward. The usermode issues an ioctl for each device in the
fs. For each device, it enumerates the allocated device chunks. For
each chunk, the contained extents are enumerated and the data checksums
fetched. The extents are read sequentially and the checksums verified.
If an error occurs (checksum or EIO), a good copy
2011 Oct 04
68
[patch 00/65] Error handling patchset v3
Hi all -
Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of
this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in
on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It
turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never
actually reports an error.
The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them