similar to: system hang with btrfs master

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71620 Priority: medium Bug ID: 71620 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent NULL pointer dereference Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: kdatanasov at gmail.com Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)

Hello I have some older programs that require OSS and /dev/dsp I have tried the pulseaudio trick with padsp but some work and some don't. I have also edited the /etc/modprobe/dist-oss-conf and uncommented the line that says install snd-pcm /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-pcm && /sbin/modprobe snd-pcm-oss && /sbin/modprobe snd-seq-device && /sbin/modprobe

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15233 Summary: geforce 7800gs and AGP 3.0 DBI function Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

An update of the ext3 journalling filesystem for 2.4 kernels is available at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ Patches are against 2.4.6-ac1 and 2.4.6. Changes since 0.0.8 include: - Multiplied the version numbering by ten to cater for bugfix releases against the 0.9.0 stream. - The main thrust has been the removal of a number of changes in the core kernel which were required

Nut will monitor the ups and shutdown Linux when the ups goes to low battery as it should. But the UPS is not shut down so the system will restart when the power is restored. If I switch the UPS off , restore power and switch the UPS on the system will restart. I have not been able to get nut to switch the UPS off after it brings the system down. I can get the UPS to switch off with upscmd

In fixing how we deal with bad inodes, we had a regression in the orphan cleanup code, since it expects to get a bad inode back. So fix it to deal with getting -ESTALE back by deleting the orphan item manually and moving on. Thanks, Reported-by: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 36

Hello everyone. The following patches are for Fedora 10(**). The distro-independent package will be put to kernel.org a bit later. I. Loading kernels from btrfs volumes Now you can load kernels and initrds from btrfs volumes composed of many devices. WARNING!!! Make sure that all components of your loading btrfs volume(*) are visible to grub. Otherwise, you''ll end with

An update to the ext3 filesystem for 2.4 kernels is available at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The diffs are against linux-2.4.7 and linux-2.4.6-ac5. The changelog is there. One rarely-occurring but oopsable bug was fixed and several quite significant performance enhancements have been made. These are in addition to the performance fixes which went into 0.9.3. Ted has put out a

I saw the presentation "Virtualization of Linux Servers" at OLS last month and it had some nice comparisons of Xen performance vs a lot of other virtualization/container technologies: http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/camargos-reprint.pdf As always with benchmarks, there are questions to ask and points to quibble, but overall Xen looks quite good... except on Dbench. Has

Users report that an extent map''s list is still linked when it''s actually going to be freed from cache. The story is that a) when we''re going to drop an extent map and may split this large one into smaller ems, and if this large one is flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING which means that it''s on the list to be logged, then the smaller ems split from it will also be

hi everybody would a tool such as dbench be a valid bechmark for gluster? and, most importantly, is there any formula to estimate raw fs to gluster performance ratio for different setups? for instance: having a replicated volume, two bricks, fuse mountpoint to volume via non-congested 1Gbps or even a volume on single brick with fuse client mountpoing locally what percentage/fraction of raw

Здравствуйте, xen-users. Just test domU IO perfomance: sda1 configure via phy:/dev/sdb1. Benchmark with dbench (dbench -D /usr/src -s 10 -t 120) - 102 Mb/s Native sistem (mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt && dbench -D /mnt -s 10 -t 120) - 140 Mb/s How i can speedup dbench? -- С уважением, Vitaliy mailto:vitaliy.okulov@gmail.com

Is there any piece of software that I can use to run between a client and a linux or windows server with a smb/cifs share that will test network speed, latency, sustained read/writes, multiple file create, read, write, close, etc.. etc.. over X period time? I'm testing a Centos server with samba and Windows 2k3/8 servers on the other end of a T1 connection and while I know the T1 bandwidth

Hi, I got problem while using smbtorture with the NBENCH test. The error happens on the "Mkdir" operation. I'm using the file "client.txt" from dbench-3.04. There are "Mkdir" operations, but in the file "torture.c", this operation is not handled. Few other operations are not handled. I did compare operations from run_netbench and those that are present

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

To test gluster's behavior under heavy load, I'm currently doing this on two machines sharing a common /mnt/gfs gluster mount: ssh bal-6.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs ssh bal-7.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs One of the processes usually dies pretty quickly like this: [608] open

I'm setting up a new file server and I just can't seem to get the expected performance from ext3. Unfortunately I'm stuck with ext3 due to my use of Lustre. So I'm hoping you dear readers will send me some tips for increasing ext3 performance. The system is using an Areca hardware raid controller with 5 7200RPM SATA disks. The RAID controller has 128MB of cache and the disks

* Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 02:54:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock. > > As explained by Linus currently it does: > > prev = *lock; > > add_smp(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC); > > > >