similar to: grub-0.97: btrfs multidevice support [files fsys_btrfs.c, btrfs.h]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "grub-0.97: btrfs multidevice support [files fsys_btrfs.c, btrfs.h]"

2009 Sep 24
6
[patch 1/2] grub-0.97: btrfs support for a singe device configuration
2009 Sep 24
7
[patch 0/2] grub-0.97: btrfs support
Hello everyone. The following patches are for Fedora 10(**). The distro-independent package will be put to kernel.org a bit later. I. Loading kernels from btrfs volumes Now you can load kernels and initrds from btrfs volumes composed of many devices. WARNING!!! Make sure that all components of your loading btrfs volume(*) are visible to grub. Otherwise, you''ll end with
2009 Sep 24
15
grub-0.97: btrfs multidevice support [PATCH]
Hello everyone. Please, find the patch for Fedora 10 in the attachment(**). The distro-independent package will be put to kernel.org a bit later. I. Loading kernels from btrfs volumes Now you can load kernels and initrds from btrfs volumes composed of many devices. WARNING!!! Make sure that all components of your loading btrfs volume(*) are visible to grub. Otherwise,
2009 Jul 22
0
grub-0.97/btrfs: [PATCH] against fedora 10
Hello everyone. This is the support for default single-device configuration. Subvolumes are _allowed_. Transparent compression is not allowed. Leafsize != 4K is not allowed. Nodesize != 4K is not allowed. Grub-0.97+btrfs doesn''t understand exotic things like preallocated extents (e.g. files composed by fallocate(2), posix_fallocate(3)). Also grub-0.97 doesn''t check btrfs
2009 Mar 14
0
How do I boot a system root on a multidevice BTRFS subvol?
Hello, recently I installed a distribution I want to look at via chroot into a btrfs subvolume on a multidevice btrfs. Now I tried to boot this, the kernel command line in GRUB looks as follows so far: /kernel-2.6.29-rc7-git3 root=/dev/sdb7 rootfstype=btrfs rootflags=device=/dev/sda1,subvol=archroot This gives "VFS: cannot find sdb7 or bad block", like it would when trying to mount
2009 Jan 12
1
GRUB and BTRFS support...
Hi Chris et al, Firstly, BTRFS is progressing at a very healthy pace and seems to be a fantastic filesystem so far, and pulled into 2.6.29-rc1 is fine news indeed. Is there any plan to add BTRFS support to GRUB (v1 or 2)? I''ve been unable to find any information so far... Many thanks, Daniel -- Daniel J Blueman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
2009 Feb 06
2
How do I correctly mount a multidevice volume via fstab?
Hi all, I am using a single volume across two devices sdb7 and sda1, initially created on sdb7, and added sda1 using btrfs-vol later. The fstab entry: /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_ST31000333AS_9TE12DSC-part7 /mnt/btrfs btrfs defaults 1 2 Now after boot I get: ---- device fsid c4822885057410c-d2d65a83c2f15fb4 devid 1 transid 73034 /dev/sdb7 btrfs: failed to read chunk tree on sdb7 ---- So I have
2009 Nov 14
2
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: Check mount status of multidevice filesystems
Some programs like btrfsck should not be run on a mounted filesystem. This patch adds a check in btrfs_open_devices() for the mount status of every device belonging to the filesystem. The function check_mount() gets improved support for loopback devices. It now detects if the program is run on the file that is being used by the loopback device. Signed-off-by: Andi Drebes
2013 Feb 18
1
btrfs send & receive produces "Too many open files in system"
I believe what I am going to write is a bug report. When I finaly did # btrfs send -v /mnt/adama-docs/backups/20130101-192722 | btrfs receive /mnt/tmp/backups to migrate btrfs from one partition layout to another. After a while system keeps saying that "Too many open files in system" and denies access to almost every command line tool. When I had access to iostat I confirmed the
2012 Mar 20
13
[PATCH 0 of 3 v2] PV-GRUB: add support for ext4 and btrfs
Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply
2009 Sep 25
0
Re: how does grub exactly work?
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Hi Edward, > Hello. > I saw your mail on btrfs ml with the grub patches and the notes > how to deal with btrfs. > > can you explain how grub and btrfs work exactly? > I read the grub manual at > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Bootstrap- > tricks.html#Bootstrap-tricks > > so I wonder: does btrfs provide a
2011 Jul 12
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: Remove unused variable 'last_index' in file.c
The variable ''last_index'' is calculated in the __btrfs_buffered_write function and passed as a parameter to the prepare_pages function, but is not used anywhere in the prepare_pages function. Remove instances of ''last_index'' in these functions. Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 7 ++----- 1 files
2012 Oct 02
3
[Btrfs-next] bulid failure at fs/btrfs/ctree.h
Hello Josef, FYI build failure occured in fs/btrfs/ctree.h. CC fs/btrfs/super.o In file included from fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h:30:0, from fs/btrfs/super.c:45: fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3235:1: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘<<’ token make[3]: *** [fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [fs/btrfs] Error 2 make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory ` make:
2008 Aug 19
0
[PATCH] Generate btrfs-progs version.h from git too
This allows version.h to be generated from either git or hg. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> --- version.sh | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/version.sh b/version.sh index d7988bf..209b7d1 100644 --- a/version.sh +++ b/version.sh @@ -8,7 +8,23 @@ v="Btrfs v0.16" -which hg > /dev/null
2009 Oct 05
1
btrfs-progs trivial: Double definition of BTRFS_CSUM_TYPE_CRC32 in ctree.h
Hello, I noticed a double definition of BTRFS_CSUM_TYPE_CRC32 in ctree.h and attach a patch that removes it. Best regards, Dirk
2010 Aug 13
1
[PATCH] btrfs: avoid duplications by moving the static int array from header to c file
The commit 607d432d referred a static int array defined in ctree.h, and a static inline function (btrfs_super_csum_size) using this array, the obvious problem is every c file using that function would have a local copy of that int array, multiple c files calling would result multiple copies of that array: $ nm fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko | grep btrfs_csum_sizes 0000010c r btrfs_csum_sizes 00000114 r
2009 Nov 24
1
grub 0.97 integration?
Could you please include a way to use HDT with grub 0.97 on this page: http://www.hdt-project.org/wiki/howtostarthdt This is the best way I have been able to come up: title Hardware Detection Tool 0.3.5 (mojito) root (cd) kernel /vimages/memdisk modules=/vimages/c32/modules.pcimap pciids=/vimages/c32/pci.ids initrd /vimages/bootdisk/hdt-0.3.5.img it is working as it should I guess, even if
2012 Jul 27
2
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: btrfs-image.c: Added NULL pointer check.
Check for the return value of ''open_ctree()'' before dereferencing it. Signed-off-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com> --- btrfs-image.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c index f2bbcc8..2a33a55 100644 --- a/btrfs-image.c +++ b/btrfs-image.c @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int create_metadump(const char *input, FILE *out,
2013 Dec 18
1
multi-device btrfs volumes
Currently, extlinux does not support multi-device BTRFS volumes. Is anything planned to add this support? I believe I understand that it has to be a lot more complicated with multi-devices because you are doing the device I/O at a very low level. However, grub2 does support booting from multi-device BTRFS volumes (actually subvolumes on multi-device BTRFS volumes). I cannot be impossible
2013 Jan 08
2
chattr +C vs. btrfs subvolume snapshot
What happens if you set an individual file inside a subvolume as nocow (chattr +C) and then take a snapshot of that subvolume and modify the file in both? Will btrfs now ignore the nocow attribute completely or will it do "as few copies as possible"? (I''d love to know if it''s possible to visualize the fragmentation of a single file.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: