similar to: [GIT PULL] btrfs rb corruption fix

Hello. I found bugs on error handlings in the functions arround the ext3 file system, which cause inadequate completions of synchronous write I/O operations when disk I/O failures occur. Both 2.4 and 2.6 have this problem. I carried out following experiment: 1. Mount a ext3 file system on a SCSI disk with ordered mode. 2. Open a file on the file system with O_SYNC|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC|O_CREAT

Hello, I've hit a bug in OCFS2 delete code which results in inodes being left on disk without any links to them. The workload triggering this creates directories on one node and deletes them on another node in the cluster. The inode is not deleted because both nodes bail out from ocfs2_delete_inode() with: Skipping delete of 100405 because it is in use on other nodes The scenario which I

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> 240f62c8756 replaced the node_lock with rcu_read_lock, but forgot to remove the actual lock in the data structure. Remove it here. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index

use i_size_read() instead of accessing inode->i_size directly. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index b2c52b3..4491851 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ int ocfs2_write_end_nolock(struct address_space *mapping, out_write_size: pos += copied; - if (pos >

In commit ea455f8ab68338ba69f5d3362b342c115bea8e13, we move the dentry lock put process into ocfs2_wq. This is OK for most case, but as for umount, it lead to at least 2 bugs. See http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1133 and http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1135. And it happens easily if we have opened a lot of inodes. For 1135, the reason is that during umount will call

Currently, default behavior of O_DIRECT writes was allowing concurrent writing among nodes, no cluster coherency guaranteed (no EX locks was taken), it hurts buffered reads on other nodes by reading stale data from cache. The new mount option introduce a chance to choose two different behaviors for O_DIRECT writes: * coherency=full, as the default value, will disallow concurrent

Hi, Since upgrading to "2.6.18-194" I am getting odd messages in the logs. Such as; sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds. The output from > grep '120 seconds' /var/log/messages | tr : ' ' | awk '{print $10}' | sort | uniq -c 6 nfsd 4 pdflush This is from an NFS server that since the upgrade has been

This happens on a freshly created btrfs filesystem in a raid10 (4x1TB) configuration with three subvolumes and 1.5 TB data. When I try to snapshot one of the subvolumes (with 100 GB of data), it says that the snapshot creation failed and I get the following error message: btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -116 After the failure: - The snapshot exists in `btrfs subvolume list'' - The

When adding orphans to an inode''s root, we start a transaction for that root that when ended in several places such as for example extent-tree.c:btrfs_remove_block_group(), inode.c:btrfs_unlink() and inode.c:btrfs_evict_node(), doesn''t result in a commit, that is, inode.c:btrfs_orphan_commit_root() doesn''t get called (via transaction.c:commit_fs_roots()). The respective

From: Wade Cline <clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com> This patch is only an RFC. My internship is ending and I was hoping to get some feedback and incorporate any suggestions people may have before my internship ends along with life as we know it (this Friday). The filesystem should mount/umount properly but tends towards the explosive side when writes start happening. My current focus is on

Hello, Ok here are all my fsync changes, including the fix for the put_transaction stuff that I posted earlier. I figure it'll be easier to just commit it as one thing then each individual peice. The additional thing that I did was add a radix tree that tracks the current outstanding transactions. I also added a field to the in memory btrfs inode that keeps track of the last transaction

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

In ocfs2, the inode block search looks for the "emptiest" inode group to allocate from. So if an inode alloc file has many equally (or almost equally) empty groups, new inodes will tend to get spread out amongst them, which in turn can put them all over the disk. This is undesirable because directory operations on conceptually "nearby" inodes force a large number of seeks. So

Hello, I want to throw this out here now that I''ve got most of the heavy lifting done for this code to make sure what I''m doing is ok for now. I''ve added an ORPHAN_DIR item key to have a hidden dir per root. Right now it just does it for whatever the default root is on mount, but I''m going to fix that to do the orphan dir check/creation on lookup of a

I've been working on a patchset to change how the inode->i_ctime is accessed in order to give us conditional, high-res timestamps for the ctime and mtime. struct timespec64 has unused bits in it that we can use to implement this. In order to do that however, we need to wrap all accesses of inode->i_ctime to ensure that bits used as flags are appropriately handled. This patchset first

With the ATI bug I was hitting earlier fixed, only my btrfs partition continues to show high cpu usage for some operations. Rsync, git pull, git checkout and svn up are typicall operations which trigger the high cpu usage. As an example, this perf report is from using git checkout to change to a new branch; the change needed to checkout 208 files out of about 1600 total files. du(1) reports

This patch introduce extent buffer cache for every i-node. By this way, we can save the search time and reduce the lock contention of the root because we needn''t search the item from the root of b+ tree. Implementation: - add two pointers of extent buffer into btrfs_inode struct, one for nodes/leaves of fs/file tree, the other for nodes/leaves of the log tree. - add a variant to tell

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them