similar to: [PATCH 1/3] Add ioctl to set per file 'compress' flag

Hello everyone, Yan Zheng sent along an update for the new format patch today, and it slightly changed the disk format for backrefs used when balancing space across drives. We decided against supporting an intermediate format that was only a week old, and his update makes a few important features much much easier (snapshot deletion for one). If you''ve tried the newformat branch and run

Hello, I am looking to scrape this Webpage: http://toast.gasunie.de/gud/search.aspx?soid=GUD&lang=de The page uses the method "POST", it contains various HTML Forms, mostly lists and a couple of radio buttons. After submit, I should get forwarded to a new page. Which selections are being made in the forms does not really matter, I get quite far, pls see the code: library(RCurl)

Hi all, following the thread about the BTRFS_IOC_TREE_SEARCH ioctl [1], I made a patch which try to address the problem of restarting the ioctl. In the current solution is the application during the restart of the search to fill the min_* fields in the "struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key". In general the values set are the last one returned "+1". But doing so we reduce the

Hello, I have a problem to build the samba_3.0 sources for sol9 , i am running gcc-3.3. It works , but the binaries became huge , the samba.pkg is about 450 MB . Now my question; do i need any compiler flags ? i did it with default-settings. But as i said , it works , i can join domains , hope there is a sun-guru. kind regards martin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS

Gud day to all, I am new in LibFlac development I 1.2.1 version of LibFlac source code. I dont want to support OGG Flac and I dont have a NASM on my system. I do have Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2005. I am trying to build only the static library for C but it always end up having some error. Could anyone can help me how to built the library using VS 2010 or 2005? I do some research, And

Hi, Afraid I dont have a very new system to try out Xen.. It''s an ia32 PIII machine with 1GB memory (that''s gud i believe). When I try to build the initrd image for my xen kernel, i get error messages complaining about missing modules, so am trying to compile them on my own. Could find support for the remaining three, but am left with lpfcdd.ko. Couldnt find an appropriate

Hello, In our company we need to setup a samba-server for store the pst files in a dedicated share on our samba server. A very important goal is "zero administration" Samba Server is a sun running solaris 9 , samba-3.0.7 is installed with winbind , all is running as expected , users can connect to the share , if the share isnt already created , it is created by preexec script

Chris, the way I did the same thing a while back is by running edquota for each user upon creation of their account. From memory there is a switch that allows you to make a user's quota the same as anothers. So I setup a "template" user that had quota the way I liked and then used him as the template for all the other user accounts. I have extracted from the quota mini howto the

Hello, is there any information about new windows version .NET or winxp server or whatever the name will be. Does it run with samba 2.2.7a or must i wait until version 3.0 is released. kind regards martin schreiber Siemens Business Services CCN-ITS Betrieb Wien GUD Gudrunstrasse 11 A-1101 Wien Martin Schreiber Phone +43 5 1707 47565 Server-Administration

Hello, I have a serious problem after upgrading from samba.2.2.8a -> 3.0.0(1) We have security = domain in both samba-versions ; for "normal" domain users nothing has changed , but we need to authenticate external users , who are not members of our native win2k domain via the smbpasswd mechanism. The user got a login-screen and authenticated himself via his "unix-login" and

"John H Terpstra" <samba@primastasys.com> wrote: >> On the UNIX system addition/change of user accounts requires UID=0. If you want your Administrator to be able to manage user accounts UID=0 is a must. Also, the RID for Administrator must be 500 for the account to have admin privileges in Windows. << OK. The Linux box is at a school and administered by novices, so

Hello, We have following environment Win2k AD with "endless" number of groups (should be more then 1000) , on the other site solaris9 samba3.0.7 compiled with all relevant optins , winbind , ads and so on , installations is ok , we joined AD domain w.o problems , getent * shows all like expected same for wbinfo The big problem remaining is , we want to restrict access to shares to

> Hello, > > We have following environment > > Win2k AD with "endless" number of groups (should be more then 1000) , on > the other site solaris9 samba3.0.7 compiled with all relevant optins , > winbind , ads and so on , installations is ok , we joined AD domain w.o > problems , getent * shows all like expected > same for wbinfo > > The big problem

This adds ioctl BTRFS_IOC_GET_FSIDS which reads the fs info through the btrfs-control Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed,

>From 03115f064be2e074d84f4e2105d2cdebde10f6ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang at intel.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:53:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Use a general way to get the default subvolume for btrfs --- extlinux/btrfs.h | 105 +++++++++++++++++++ extlinux/main.c | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 377 insertions(+),

I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and it also looks that this one is more proper. Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@zeuux.org> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index c2aa33e..f229950 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -472,7

Hi, I try to format a USB memory with a Btrfs. I can format it with mkfs.btrfs without problems. But; when I try to mount it, it fails to mount with the below error messages. But the USB memory works fine with other filesystems (ext4, XFS etc.). So, the hardware is not faulty. tarkane@tarkane:~$ sudo mkfs.btrfs -d single -n 4096 /dev/sdb1 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.18-26-g0030f1d IS EXPERIMENTAL

This patch series is the leftovers of a patch series sent in September 2023 [1] in an attempt to get some of the patches landed finally. This patch series originally came about after a _long_ discussion between me and Maxime Ripard in response to a different patch I sent out [2]. As part of that discussion, we realized that it would be good if DRM drivers consistently called

This was a request from the systemd guys. They need a quick and easy way to get all devices attached to a Btrfs filesystem in order to check if any of the disks are SSD for...something, I didn''t ask :). I''ve tested this with the btrfs-progs patch that accompanies this patch. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 64

This patch series came about after a _long_ discussion between me and Maxime Ripard in response to a different patch I sent out [1]. As part of that discussion, we realized that it would be good if DRM drivers consistently called drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() properly at shutdown and driver remove time as it's documented that they should do. The eventual goal of this would be to enable removing