similar to: BUG at fs/buffer.c:2933 during umount

Hi all, I am testing new kernel on a mips machine (64 bits for kernel, 32 bits userland) and I found a problem when mounting the root file system. It is an ext3 file system that is correctly mounted as read only. While booting the system remount the file system as read/write and keep starting all daemons. Moving from 2.6.26 to 2.6.30 kernel, I get this error while remounting the file system

Ralf Hildebrandt reported[0] the following messages on ext3-users: name_count maxed, losing inode data: dev=00:05, inode=5221 because the filesystem in question is indeed ext3. However, this warning is not generated by ext3 code but by the audit framework. While the origins of these messages are discussed elsewhere[1] the following patch modifies the printks in question so that users know

Hi, I''m hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal device, nothing to do with loop, encryption etc. # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using error checking /dev/sda5 mount status Is there something I can do to resolve this? Thank you Lubos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Larry Martell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> Larry Martell wrote: >>>> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50 >>>> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously. >>>>

Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is always set to "nobarrier" Here's an example: [root at host ~]# mount -o nobarrier /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt [root at host ~]# grep xfs /proc/mounts /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt xfs

When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel

We are running a benchmark that does single threaded 512 KB writes to a LUN on a CLARiiON storage array. The dual Xeon host (Dell 2650) with 4 GB of memory runs RHEL 4U3 We measured the write bandwidth for writes to the block device corresponding to the lun (e.g. /dev/sdb), a file in an ext2 filesystem and to a file in an ext3 file system. Write b/w for 512 KB writes Block device 312 MBps Ext2

Hey all, I''m trying to figure out how to re-size physical partitions in the Dom U. I''ve read up what I can find on line and finally decided to have Logical Volumes in the Dom 0 and pass them as physical volumes for use in the Dom U. Here''s an example of what I''m doing. To start in the Dom 0 I created the LV''s with lvcreate -n guest_boot -L 100M

On 10/24/2016 04:51 AM, mark wrote: > Absolutely add nobarrier, and see what happens. Using "nobarrier" might increase overall write throughput, but it removes an important integrity feature, increasing the risk of filesystem corruption on power loss. I wouldn't recommend doing that unless your system is on a UPS, and you've tested and verified that it will perform an

There are a number of flaws in the blktap userspace daemon when dealing with I/O errors. - The backends which use AIO check the io_events.res member to determine if an I/O error occurred. Which is good. But when calling the callback to signal completion of the I/O, they pass the io_events.res2 member Now this seems fine at first glance[1] "res is the usual result of an I/O

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Larry Martell wrote: >> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50 >> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously. >> >> We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the partition the files >> are FTP-ed to using NFS. > <snip>

Hi, I get the following error when I try to mount lustre on the clients. Permanent disk data: Target: lustre-OSTffff Index: unassigned Lustre FS: lustre Mount type: ldiskfs Flags: 0x72 (OST needs_index first_time update ) Persistent mount opts: errors=remount-ro,extents,mballoc Parameters: mgsnode=164.107.119.231 at tcp sh: losetup: command not found mkfs.lustre: error 32512 on losetup:

I''ve been monitoring the lists for a while now but didn''t see this problem mentioned in particular: I''ve got a fairly standard desktop system at home, 700gb WD drive, nothing special, with 2 btrfs filesystems and some snapshots. The system runs for days, and I''ve noticed unusual disk activity the other evening - turns out that it''s taking forever to

All, I'm requesting comments from the expert readers of ext3-users on these notes for tuning ext3 for performance. Most helpful would be feedback pertinent to RHEL 5; as XFS isn't supported under Red Hat Enterprise Linux these items are an attempt to match XFS performance with ext3. These items were culled from a number of sources. Will they be effective for achieving the performance

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.4.1-6 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, (There appear to be several reports on the BTS with concerns relating to this report. Some unarchiving/merging may be necessary. Reassignment may be needed as well since I'm not sure which package this problem would fall under. Ultimately decided to file with xen-utils-common with 'xl' being the frontend

Hello Hendrik Can you help input 2 commands 'mount' and 'df -TPh' on OMV, and post the output to us, thank you. -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc.

On 06/10/2013 01:41 PM, pr.G wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:29:32AM +0400, свящ. Георгий Гольцов wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >>> On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys >>>> inside container?

Hello! How do i get pass this error? offlinehacker:~/ $ virsh --debug 0 -c lxc:/// create o1.xml create: file(optdata): o1.xml error: Failed to create domain from o1.xml error: internal error: No valid cgroup for machine c1 My cgroups seem to be mounted: cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup

I have been experimenting exporting btrfs subvolumes over nfs. Main subvolume is filesys1 mounted at /filesys1. Below this is subvolume base, user1 is in base and documents is in user1. documents is mounted at /documents. /etc/exports is: /filesys1/base/user1 172.16.0.0/24(rw,no_acl,no_root_squash,fsid=0) /filesys1/user1-snapshot 172.16.0.0/24(rw,no_acl,no_root_squash,fsid=0)

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys > > inside container? > > > > When I start container via lxc-start and do not add mount point to config, > > then /sys inside container is empty. > > >