similar to: [PATCH] add btrfs-image man page

Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com> --- man/Makefile | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ man/btrfsck.8.in | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/Makefile create mode 100644 man/btrfsck.8.in diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2665dd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/man/Makefile

Remove unused variable in btrfs-image.c (update_super) and update man page documentation about -r option. Running btrfsck on a restored image produces missing chunk information. This is because by default, btrfs-image fixes up chunk tree to use 1 stripe pointing to the primary device. This in turns results in btrfsck making some noise. $ ./mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb2 -f $ ./btrfs-image /dev/sdb2

This is the source code of the man page of btrfs. The main changes from my previous patch are: - Rearranged the short command in order to avoid conflicts - Renamed the ''create'' verb is ''subvolume'' Thanks to Daniel for some tweaks on the syntax BR G.Baroncelli diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile index 4e8893b..4a90b75 100644 --- a/man/Makefile +++

Split CFLAGS into CFLAGS (user part) and AM_CFLAGS (not-so-user part; variable name taken from automake, but otherwise no relation). Also add LDFLAGS. This allows me to use `make CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIE" LDFLAGS="-pie"` without dropping the other important (AM_CFLAGS) flags. Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> --- btrfs-progs/Makefile | 17

Add man/btrfsctl.8.in Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com> --- man/btrfsctl.8.in | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/btrfsctl.8.in diff --git a/man/btrfsctl.8.in b/man/btrfsctl.8.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e11f46a --- /dev/null +++ b/man/btrfsctl.8.in @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@

''btrfsctl -A /path/to/device/file'' would only scan for a valid btrfs on the device using volume recognition helpers. --- btrfsctl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfsctl.c b/btrfsctl.c index 66c4e89..61020de 100644 --- a/btrfsctl.c +++ b/btrfsctl.c @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ #include

Hello, I''ve just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git However, when I come to make it fails like so: gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsctl.c gcc -g -Werror -Os -o btrfsctl btrfsctl.o ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o

Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index be648bc..e036880 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@ -2054,3 +2054,41

If I scan I device with a btrfs with -A, it finds it: (~/btrfs-progs-unstable) sudo ./btrfsctl -A /dev/sda5 operation complete Btrfs v0.19-1-g4f89b6e-dirty But when I do a "scan all devices", it can''t find my btrfs on /dev/sda5: (~/btrfs-progs-unstable) sudo ./btrfsctl -a Scanning for Btrfs filesystems failed to read /dev/sr0 I''m using btrfs-progs-unstable version

NOTE: in order to apply this patch you should: git mv btrfsck.c cmd-fsck.c This patch moves btrfsck in to "btrfs fsck". It also adds support for symlinks to the btrfs binary to retain compablity, =) I think something should be done to the help description but i''m not sure what... Anyway, feedback is welcome. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Hi all, below a configuration for udev/initramfs which I propose to scan the block devices looking for a multi-volume btrfs filesystem. Btrfs has the capability to span a file-system on multiple device. In order to do that, the involved devices have to be "registered" in the kernel. In order to do that there are two options: # btrfs device scan <device> (or the old

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. The core of this release is explicit back references for all metadata blocks, data extents, and directory items. These are a crucial building

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. The core of this release is explicit back references for all metadata blocks, data extents, and directory items. These are a crucial building

Hello everyone, Just before I head off to xmas vacation, I've pushed out my current queue of unstable things to the unstable tree. The big changes are the online resize, and a very very simple form of ENOSPC detection: btrfsctl -r new_size /mount_point new_size can be an absolute number: btrfsctl -r 8g /mount_point or it can be an relative number: # add 4GB btrfsctl -r +4g /mount_point

i''m not a C developer, but i like to think i know enough to be dangerous (pragmatic) :-D building from git master failed with: .......... .......... gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsck.o.d,-MT,btrfsck.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsck.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors btrfsck.c: In function ‘maybe_free_inode_rec’: btrfsck.c:323:2: error: implicit

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> $ LDFLAGS=-static make gcc -lpthread -g -O0 -o btrfs btrfs.o btrfs_cmds.o scrub.o \ ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o print-tree.o root-tree.o dir-item.o file-item.o inode-item.o inode-map.o crc32c.o rbtree.o extent-cache.o extent_io.o volumes.o utils.o btrfs-list.o btrfslabel.o -static -luuid scrub.o: In function

From: Hugo Mills <h.r.mills@reading.ac.uk> btrfs-find-root isn''t yet integrated into the main btrfs tool, and is an important recovery tool, so it deserves to be built as a static binary. Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> --- Makefile | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index d102dee..c519d21 100644

When building on ppc64 I hit a number of warnings in printf: btrfs-map-logical.c:69: error: format ‘%Lu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘u64’ Fix them. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> --- diff --git a/btrfs-list.c b/btrfs-list.c index 93766a8..c602b87 100644 --- a/btrfs-list.c +++ b/btrfs-list.c @@ -249,7 +249,8 @@ static int

The new xfstests will run fsck against the volume to make sure we didn''t introduce any inconsistencies, which is nice except we will error out immediately if we mount with inode_cache. We need to make btrfsck skip the special free space cache items and then just assume that we have a link for the free space cache inode item. This makes btrfsck pass with success on a fs with inode cache

btrfs 0.19 Ubuntu 10.10 Linux linux 2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 11:55:36 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux I create a new btrfs on a 200GB disk with one partition. I mount the partition. I create a snapshot of that partition. I unmount the partition. I run btrfsck and it says I have an "unresolved ref" error. If I create two snaps, I get three errors. If I create three snaps, I