similar to: [PATCH] fix enospc when there is plenty of space

The whole loop=0,1,2 thing was kind of odd and not very self explanatory. I''ve replaced it with a list_for_each_entry on space_info->block_groups. If we have a hint we just jump into the loop with the block group and start looking for space. If we don''t find anything we start at the beginning and start looking. We never come out of the loop with a ref on the block_group

Hello, This patch fixes a problem where we end up seeking too much when *last_ptr is valid. This happens because btrfs_lookup_first_block_group only returns a block group that starts on or after the given search start, so if the search_start is in the middle of a block group it will return the block group after the given search_start, which is suboptimal. This patch fixes that by doing a

Yan Zheng hit a problem where we tried to remove some free space but failed because we couldn''t find the free space entry. This is because the free space was held within a bitmap that had a starting offset well before the actual offset of the free space, and there were free space extents that were in the same range as that offset, so tree_search_offset returned with NULL because we

This patch finally gives us full proper -ENOSPC handling for btrfs. Now whenever you do a btrfs_start_transaction, you must specify the number of items you are planning to add/delete/modify. The worst case number of blocks that could be modified by changing that number of items will be calculated and checked against the amount of free space in the space_info where the root you are modifying

The biggest one is a fix for fstrim, and there''s a fix for on-disk free space cache. Others are small fixes and cleanups. The last three have been sent weeks ago. The patchset is also available in this repo: git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git for-chris Note there''s a small confict with Al Viro''s vfs changes. Li Zefan (11): Btrfs: add pinned extents to

We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. There are a lot of fixes in here to make this

We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. There are a lot of fixes in here to make this

Hello, This patch adds a new parameter 'full_scan' to 'find_search_start', thereby 'find_search_start' can know whether 'find_free_extent' is in full scan phrase. I feel that 'find_search_start' should skip calling 'btrfs_find_block_group' when 'find_free_extent' is in full scan phrase. In my test on a 2GB volume, Oops occurs when space

I''ve been working on running down intermittent ENOSPC issues. I can only seem to replicate ENOSPC errors when running zlib compression. However, I have been seeing similar ENOSPC errors to a lesser extent when playing with the LZ4HC patches. I apologize for not following up on this sooner, but I had drifted away from using zlib, and didn''t notice there was still an issue. My

I suspect this might be related to previous btrfs errors I''ve had on the same filesystem. See: http://python.ca/nas/linux/btrfs_bug.txt The most recent kernel message is: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8239 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x218/0x275() Hardware name: MS-7388 Modules linked in: udf crc_itu_t isofs loop nls_iso8859_1 vboxnetflt vboxdrv nls_utf8 nls_cp437

If we have particularly full nodes, we could call btrfs_node_blockptr up to 32 times, which is 32 pairs of kmap/kunmap, which _sucks_. So go ahead and map the extent buffer while we look for readahead targets. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

the tree log recover code expects no free space cached before it executes. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 4/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 8/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c --- 4/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-05-11 14:15:29.174108554 +0800 +++ 8/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-05-11 13:26:38.036107000 +0800 @@ -316,11 +329,6 @@ static int caching_kthread(void *data) if (!path)

I?m trying to setup Spotlight with Tracker (2.3 from Ubuntu repo) backend in Ubuntu 20.04 and Samba 4.12.7. I?ve followed the wiki closely but every time I try to search I get this in the logs: [2020/10/02 10:43:42.078242, 0] ../../source3/rpc_server/mdssvc/mdssvc_tracker.c:403(mds_tracker_search_start) mds_tracker_search_start: no connection to Tracker [2020/10/02 10:43:42.079897, 0]

Here are 3 patches to avoid undesired aborts of mkfs.btrfs. These are based on top of Chris''s btrfs-progs.git: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git Thanks, H.Seto Hidetoshi Seto (3): btrfs-progs: error if device for mkfs is too small btrfs-progs: error if device have no space to make primary chunks btrfs-progs: calculate available

We still need to say we''re flushing if we''re limit flushing to keep somebody from coming in and stealing our reservation. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index ad8786b..721efb8 100644 ---

Reserve metadata space for extent tree, checksum tree and root tree Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:26:38.327697818 +0800 +++ 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:30:01.883697869 +0800 @@ -682,21 +682,15 @@ struct btrfs_space_info { u64 bytes_reserved; /* total bytes the allocator has

In clear_extent_bit, it is enough that next node is adjacent in tree level. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index fcf77e1..e941cc4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -577,8 +577,7 @@ hit_next: if

Rewrite btrfs_drop_extents by using btrfs_duplicate_item, so we can avoid calling lock_extent within transaction. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 7 +- fs/btrfs/file.c | 659 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 27 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +- 5 files changed, 277

Hi, my system suddenly crashed and gave me this dump: http://imgur.com/oO6S0 I checked and there is not btrfs commit in linus'' tree since I compiled this kernel. Gustavo

Document those places in the btrfs code which are BUGing on non-fatal error conditions that should be handled by proper error paths. This makes it easier to distinguish between what needs fixing versus which BUG_ON''s we might want to keep (to trap code bugs, unexpected inconsistencies, etc). Do this with a trivial macro, ''btrfs_fixable_bug_on'' which just defines to