similar to: [PATCH 2/4] Add shared reference cache

Hey guys, I was trying to build the btrfs modules from btrfs- unstable.git/master against the Ubuntu Karmic 2.6.31 kernel, and get some failures in ref-cache.c: /home/jdong/code/kernel/btrfs-0.17/ref-cache.h:62: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type /home/jdong/code/kernel/btrfs-0.17/ref-cache.c: In function ‘btrfs_remove_leaf_refs’:

I hit this error when reproducing a bug that would end in a transaction abort. We take the delayed ref head''s mutex to keep anybody from processing it while we''re destroying it, but we fail to drop the mutex before we carry on and free the damned thing. Fix this by doing the remove logic for the head ourselves and unlock the mutex, that way we can avoid use after

This patch adds mixed back ref support for btrfs programs. The mixed back ref is a new disk format. back compatilibity is still not implemented. To try the new disk format, you need fresh formatted btrfs. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp btrfs-progs-unstable/crc32c.h btrfs-progs-2/crc32c.h --- btrfs-progs-unstable/crc32c.h 2008-09-30 16:50:58.898877720 +0800

Dave Sterba pointed out a sleeping while atomic bug while doing fsync. This is because I''m an idiot and didn''t realize that rwlock''s were spin locks, so we''ve been holding this thing while doing allocations and such which is not good. This patch fixes this by dropping the write lock before we do anything heavy and re-acquire it when it is done. We also need

"btrfs subvolume list" gets a new option "--fields=..." which allows to specify which pieces of information about subvolumes shall be printed. This is necessary because this commit also adds all the so far missing items from the root_item like the received UUID, all generation values and all time values. The parameters to the "--fields" option is a list of items to

This adds a leak decoder callback so that kmem_cache_destroy() can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects. Callers like btrfs are using their own leak tracking which will manage allocated objects in a list(or something else), this does indeed the same thing as what slab does. So adding a callback for leak tracking can avoid this as well as runtime overhead. Signed-off-by:

This adds a leak decoder callback so that slab destruction can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects. Callers like btrfs are using their own leak tracking which will manage allocated objects in a list(or something else), this does indeed the same thing as what slab does. So adding a callback for leak tracking can avoid this as well as runtime overhead. (The idea is from

In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when calling ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree and ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del failed, it goes to out and then tries to call mutex_unlock without mutex_lock before. And when calling ocfs2_reserve_blocks_for_rec_trunc failed, it should free ref_tree before return. Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com> --- fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file

This patch changes some BUG_ON() to the error return. (but, most callers still use BUG_ON()) Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 ++++- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/inode-map.c | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 ++++-

This patch adds freeze_fs()/unfreeze_fs() for ocfs2 so that it supports freeze/thaw. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h | 2 + fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 1 + fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 12 +++++ fs/ocfs2/super.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-

This is a first draft of a subvolume quota implementation. It is possible to limit subvolumes and any group of subvolumes and also to track the amount of space that will get freed when deleting snapshots. The current version is functionally incomplete, with the main missing feature being the initial scan and rescan of an existing filesystem. I put some effort into writing an introduction into

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them