similar to: Fixes pushed to the stable tree

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.16 is available for download, please see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ for download links and project information. v0.16 has a shiny new disk format, and is not compatible with filesystems created by older Btrfs releases. But, it should be the fastest Btrfs yet, with a wide variety of scalability fixes and new features. There were quite a few contributors this time

When dropping a empty tree, walk_down_tree() skips checking extent information for the tree root. This will triggers a BUG_ON in walk_up_proc(). Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 1/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c --- 1/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-01-22 12:16:34.203525744 +0800 +++ 2/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-02-01 10:26:19.865562007 +0800 @@

The quilt patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm ------------------------------------------------------ From:

The quilt patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix defrag path triggering jbd2 ASSERT has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ocfs2-fix-defrag-path-triggering-jbd2-assert.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm ------------------------------------------------------ From: Heming

Hello everyone, Yan Zheng''s latest commit redoes the extent back references to make them more efficient. This includes a new disk format, so any pulls from the git unstable trees will have a new disk format to them. I''ve bumped the magic in both the kernel and progs repos, so you can''t accidentally mount an FS with the wrong format. I still hope to finish off

I recently applied the ext3-2.4-0.9.6-249.gz patch to an otherwise unmodified official-from-Linus 2.4.9 kernel. I built both ext2 and ext3 in as modules, did the "tune2fs -j" incantation, and rebooted. Mounting / as ext3 worked fine. But a few seconds later, my startup scripts tried to launch a squad of automounter daemons, and that didn't work so well. A stream of kernel

Hi everyone, I''ve pushed out my current kernel git tree to a new branch called integration-test. This is meant for integration testing only and should not be run by anyone who doesn''t love crashes. I''ve pulled together a lot of important work from a lot of different people. It includes: The new inode number allocator Delayed inode and directory item updates Scrub,

Hi all Having managed ZFS for about two years, I want to post a wishlist. INCLUDED IN ZFS - Mirror existing single-drive filesystem, as in ''zfs attach'' - RAIDz-stuff - single and hopefully multiple-parity RAID configuration with block-level checksumming - Background scrub/fsck - Pool-like management with multiple RAIDs/mirrors (VDEVs) - Autogrow as in ZFS autoexpand NOT

Hi All, I''m trying to repair a broken fs using btrfsck and am hitting a failed assertion. I''d appreciate any suggestions for what to do next. Is there any thing I can do to help fix this bug? Any other information from my FS which would help? If the FS could be salvaged that would be a bonus, but I''m more interested in providing a useful bug report before wiping the

Yesterday, I compiled the new kernel 3.0rc1 from git, but I never successed to go over the point: "Removing old temporary files". Pressing control-c let me boot on, but the pc was the complete time on very high load. It took me minutes, just to reach the tty login - and again minutes after login in, that I had my shell and a prompt to enter something. The load was at that time beyond 10.

My UPS is a Eaton Ellipse 1000S (But its identified as MGE Ellipse 0463:ffff). I have been using the usb interface with the usbhid-ups driver, but I found that sometimes (too much times) the driver doesn't respond and NUT doesn't receive changes nor notifications from the UPS. The kernel lose the connections with USB device, in the kernel logs appears: Dec 30 11:24:12 rei kernel:

Hello everyone, btrfs-unstable now has Yan Zheng''s fallocate support, along with disk format changes. I was hoping to roll all of this into a single format change with the compression code, but there was too much conflict between the two patches. The fallocate work is pretty neat, it allows preallocation of extents and overwrites them without triggering COW as long as there are no

Hello everyone, I''m pushing out fixes for most of the issues brought up in code review for merging into mainline. Soon the unstable trees will be updated to 2.6.28 One of the commits is quite large, fixing almost all of the checkpatch.pl warnings and errors. Most of them were one of these 3: while(x) -> while (x) printk() -> printk(KERN_FOO) printk(... %Lu, some_u64) ->

I have the Official Samba 3 and Samba-3 by example books, although not the second edition copies. But I can't seem to find out how to push out patches and hotfixes with Samba. Is this not possible at this time? I don't have a lot of experience with Windows but I am going to have to deal with this issue soon. I think I understand that pushing out policies is possible. Is Microsoft

Hello. I am continuing my tests of BtrFS under a practical workload. Recently an incorrect poweroff (or maybe a small bug in BtrFS) caused a small data loss. The actual damage was non-existent. I used old branch, so maybe the relevant code is already improved. 1. Why btrfsck says "bad block" on that partition? What does it mean? My fist reaction was to use badblocks. It found no

Hi Amos On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > > FAILED: patch

Hi Amos On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > > FAILED: patch

Hi Everyone, I am very new to this mailing list and very much interested in getting into the internals of BTRFS file system I was looking for mkfs.btrfs source code so that I can start getting how the disk is formatted with btrfs system. Can anyone of you redirect me to that place to download the btrfsprogs source code. Thanks in advance. Debasish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git master head: 0cb8658e96f1ba2ff2d730224cb31e231edd318d commit: 7017ac470ed5b029bc683883714a7f4a4ed34c33 Btrfs: move some common code into a subfunction date: 2 days ago config: make ARCH=x86_64 allyesconfig All warnings: fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ''btrfs_rm_device'': fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1505:1:

It seems that the BTRFS_IOC_CLONE ioctl fails when trying to do a cross-subvolume clone of a file. Chris Mason suggested in the past ([1]) that this should be possible. Am I missing something? [1] http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2010/6/10/6884911 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to