similar to: Stability issues with Dovecot imap-login in Centos 5?

Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no smart host stuff_). I've got Sendmail 8.14 installed on a CentOS 7.3

Dear All, I have two machines, a Centos 3.4 machine and a Centos 4.1 machine. I have used the same sendmail.mc file on each, and 3.4 machine does plain SMTP auth with no problems, compiling the same mc file on the 4.1 machine gives this error: xxxxx [x.x.x.x] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA in the logs, it doesn't even try to authenticate, the cyrus sasl rpm

under 5.6 I have a script that runs every night to rsync the repodata for local installations. I added the 6.0 to do the same. Something seems wrong now for 6.0. I do the same thing and I get errors from my local repo at install time. Seems like the cyrus-sasl package is never happy and aborts the installation. Is something wrong with the script below? It seems like it successfully copies

I'm doing a complete upgrade of a server which I was using uw-imap for the imap/pop4 daemons.(This was an old RH 7.2 system and has been upgraded to CentOS 4.4 64bit) I notice there isn't an rpm at any of the repositories for this. I do pop before smpt for the remote users I have and also use procmail for calling spamc from SpamAssassin. Is there some place I can get uw's imap or

Hey folks, New to the list - and I hope this isn't a dumb question. I am in the process of revamping the way we authenticate to our Linux servers. Moving away from pam_ldap and pam_nss, in favor of winbind and pam_nss. The reason for this is that I feel winbindd does a better job of failing over from a unavailable authentication server than pam_ldap. In any case - I have it all working

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this >> Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? > yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm And samba-*-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at

I've got a CentOS 6 machine that's slated to go into production providing some web and development-repository services. Part of the environment is gitweb, which works as expected with one glitch: SELinux doesn't allow gitweb.cgi to query sssd to display who owns the repositories. The audit log entries are pretty straightforward, e.g., type=AVC msg=audit(XXXXXXXXXXXX): avc:

On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I might actually be able to have a workable answer: > > alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs' /usr/bin/df \ -x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \ -x devpts -x devtmpfs -x efivarfs -x hugetlbfs -x mqueue \ -x nfsd -x proc -x pstore -x rpc_pipefs -x securityfs \ -x selinuxfs -x sysfs -x tmpfs :-) --

On Tue, 23 May 2017, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > hw wrote: >> >> are there packages replacing the ancient perl version in >> Centos 7 with a more recent one, like 5.24? At least the >> state feature is required. Perl 5.24 is available in SCL, in the centos-sclo-rh repository. [root ~]# yum info rh-perl524-perl Name : rh-perl524-perl Arch : x86_64 Epoch

Hi community, In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and plv8 projects) Thanks

Hello all! I'm brand new to the mailing list, and I've encountered an issue with the microcode_ctl package version 2.1-16 being installed during the CentOS 7.3 upgrade. It causes my servers to hard stop and they need to be forcibly powered off and back on again with the power button to continue. This RedHat thread https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398698 details the issue,

On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > > information on this matter, and have found information that is > anywhere from > > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more > up to

hope thus comes under the remit of this mailking list... We use puppet, and Im trying to come up with "code" that will create two user accounts with a shared groiup ID eg? user1 with UID 1000user 2 with UID 1001 but I would like them BOTH to share the GID of 2000 I've tried the following accounts::groups:? ? jointgroup:? ? ? ? gid: '2000' accounts::users: ? ? user1:? ? ? ?

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Alexandru Lazarev wrote: > Hi community, > In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL > repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. > > How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it > (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and > plv8 projects) Do you mean the

For those of you who are either part of the secret cabal, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the cryptex is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.

Hello, does it in any respect (throughput/performance, cpu load, I/O load, resilience, ...) matter, if one mounts subdirectories of an NFS (v3) export into separate directories or if one just mounts the parent directory? I.e. like this: server:/export/base/a -> /mnt/a server:/export/base/b -> /mnt/b server:/export/base/c -> /mnt/c server:/export/base/d -> /mnt/d

Hi, I am user of CentOS 8. When can we expect an image on AWS? I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that. thanks --- Lee

There is a slight performance related reason for exporting disk partitions individually, the performance boost is server-side as Paul says. The advantage is that the no_subtree_check can be used without any additional security risk. It is probably the case that the /export/base/a is a partition, is exported with no_subtree_check, and therefore there is a small performance boost. Preventing

I'm a little new to CentOS and very rusty on Linux in general (it's been 7 years since I worked on a Linux kernel), so this may seem like a dumb question. I have two issues with my machine - sound and video. My sound card is not recognized at all (I think it's on the mobo, but I'm not sure how to identify it), and I have an ATI dual video card with two screens, but both show

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:02 PM Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2020, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am user of CentOS 8. > > When can we expect an image on AWS? > > I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that. > > I can't speak to AWS per se, but Digital Ocean has a CentOS 8