similar to: Btrfs v0.14 Released

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In openSUSE 10.3, AppArmor modifies remove_suid to take a struct path rather than just a dentry. This patch tests that the kernel is openSUSE 10.3 or newer and adjusts the call accordingly. Debian/Ubuntu with AppArmor applied will also need a similar patch. Maintainers of btrfs under those distributions should build on this patch or,

Having done a current checkout, creating a new FS and running iozone [1] on it results in an oops [2]. remove_suid is called, accessing offset 14 of a NULL pointer. Let me know if you''d like me to test any fix, do further debugging or get more information. Thanks, Daniel --- [1] # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda4 # mount /dev/sda4 /mnt /mnt# iozone -a . --- [2] [ 899.118926] BUG: unable to

V1 -> V2: Move kmalloc() before mutex_lock(), suggested by Arjan. file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held, file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock(). Plus, check the return value of kmalloc(). Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Arjan <arjan@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Yan Zheng

V2 -> V3: set ''err'' to -ENOMEM when kmalloc() fails. Thanks to Tao. V1 -> V2: Move kmalloc() before mutex_lock(), suggested by Arjan. file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held, file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock(). Plus, check the return value of kmalloc(). Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Arjan

Hi, uname -a: Linux btrfstest 2.6.24-4-generic #1 SMP Mon Jan 14 17:30:39 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux btrfs version: 0.11 fs: /dev/sda5 on /mnt type btrfs (rw) root@btrfstest:/tmp# dd if=/dev/zero of=foobar bs=1024 count=100000 100000+0 records in 100000+0 records out 102400000 bytes (102 MB) copied, 15.5326 seconds, 6.6 MB/s root@btrfstest:/tmp# cp foobar /mnt/ Segmentation fault

file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held, file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock(). Plus, check the return value of kmalloc(). Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index 7c3cd24..cd36301 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -944,14 +944,17 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct file

This fixes the following warning: drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:1032:5: warning: ?queue? may be used uninitialized in this function The conditions that govern when queue is set aren't apparent to gcc. Setting queue = NULL clears the warning. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm at suse.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) ---

This fixes the following warning: drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:1032:5: warning: ?queue? may be used uninitialized in this function The conditions that govern when queue is set aren't apparent to gcc. Setting queue = NULL clears the warning. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm at suse.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) ---

On 4/5/16 4:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:14:19PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >> This fixes the following warning: >> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:1032:5: warning: ?queue? may be used >> uninitialized in this function >> >> The conditions that govern when queue is set aren't apparent to gcc. >> >> Setting queue = NULL

On 4/5/16 4:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:14:19PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >> This fixes the following warning: >> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:1032:5: warning: ?queue? may be used >> uninitialized in this function >> >> The conditions that govern when queue is set aren't apparent to gcc. >> >> Setting queue = NULL

One of our users recently had a powerfail while connected to our meetme gateway. (Asterisk 1.4.17 on debian 4.0) Through the course of it, asterisk never hung up. His system came back up, and started sending ICMP port unreachables, but the stream went on, flooding him with "silence" media stream packets (there was nobody else in the conference). Is asterisk aware of ICMP

Hello All, Dovecot 1.0.3 I am coming from UW IMAP, and I'm finding for some reason that mail is getting stored in a variety of places (which I believe, is because by default UW imap allowed access to the entire home directory). All files are mbox. My default delivery location is ~/.mail Thus: * At least a couple of my users have mail in ~/INBOX, as well as ~/INBOX.drafts (not many

When using a PRI, after the remote party hangs up, asterisk tries to spawn a call to the "h" extension. Is this normal behavior for a pri to try to call the "h" extension to try to clean things up? Call Comes In: -- Executing Dial("Zap/1-1", "SIP/16464436000@AST-237.65") in new stack -- Called 16464436000@AST-237.65 -- Accepting call from

Okay, this one is driving me nuts. I have a fedora core 1 machine running asterisk from CVS. Built last week. I have a couple of snom phones with the latest firmware. Here's the issue, it's a wierd one. You start up the phones, they register, all is good. They show up in sip show peers like thus: danm/danm 65.125.237.91 D N 255.255.255.255 5060 OK (29 ms)

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them

Guys, For what it's worth, after months of trying to troubleshoot issues with them, and after paying them around $2500 for setup and a down payment (it's unclear what of that will be refunded, if any) BroadVox -- http://www.broadvox.net/ -- decided to terminate our contract without any valid reason, and the only explanation they could cite was "it's because of the software

Hi, is it possible to have several ocfs2 clusters in the same machine? We have webserver1 and webserver2 that should belong to cluster1 and cluster2 "workgroup". Cluster1 should be made of webserver1, webserver2 and application_server1 Cluster2 should be made of webserver1, webserver2 and application_server2 Is this possible? Thanks, Nuno Fernandes

Hi I'm looking for a tool that records and plots graphs of UPS load over time? Any suggestions? JonB

I'm sure this exists elsewhere, but, as a trade-off, could you achieve what you want with a separate helper function F(expr) that constructs the function you want to pass to [lsv]apply()? Something that would allow you to write: sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), F(summary(lm(mpg ~ wt,.))$r.squared)) Such an F() function would apply elsewhere too. /Henrik On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM

All, I occasionally manage some APC PDU devices. I manage them via a VPN, which enforces super-heavy crypto, and their access is restricted to only jumphosts and the VPN. Basically, the only time you need to log into these is when you go to reboot something that's down. Their web UI with SSL doesn't work with modern browsers. Their CPU is...tiny, and their SSHd implementation