similar to: [ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.0rc2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under the version 3 of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Release Announcements ===================== This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under the version 3 of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preamble: Please help us testing this release candidate! If there are no major catastrophes, it will become the first major release of Samba 3.2.0. It might take a few hours until the files will be spread to all mirrors. ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preamble: Please help us testing this release candidate! If there are no major catastrophes, it will become the first major release of Samba 3.2.0. It might take a few hours until the files will be spread to all mirrors. ================================= Release Notes for Samba 3.2.0rc1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Patience is the companion of wisdom." Saint Augustine ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first stable release of Samba 3.2.0. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Patience is the companion of wisdom." Saint Augustine ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the first stable release of Samba 3.2.0. Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under

On 1 December 2011 17:15, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> I'm running LLVM under threadsanitizer >> (http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/) to find and remove races in >> a larger program that uses LLVM as a library. One of the things that I >> found is that the TargetOptions are all

On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > I'm running LLVM under threadsanitizer > (http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/) to find and remove races in > a larger program that uses LLVM as a library. One of the things that I > found is that the TargetOptions are all global; you could create a > TargetMachine targeting ARM and X86 in two threads, but they both have

I'm running LLVM under threadsanitizer (http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/) to find and remove races in a larger program that uses LLVM as a library. One of the things that I found is that the TargetOptions are all global; you could create a TargetMachine targeting ARM and X86 in two threads, but they both have to share the same FloatABIType setting. This is silly, and I plan to fix it

In my project I have a group of foreign types (C++ classes) that I want to use, but don't want to represent as structs within LLVM. For example, for each field in each C++ class I have a setter and getter function that I'd like to use. The setters and getters are "extern C" functions to avoid problems with C++'s name mangling. After going over the documentation it

On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> Instead of adding a bunch of instance variables (+ getters/setters) into TargetMachine, why not make TargetOptions be a class, and have TM contain an instance of it? > > That works too, it makes little difference to me. One reason is that > most references to these globals are inside classes that derive from > TargetMachine so I

?Hello fellow developers, yesterday, I was thinking about how to implement specific config. attributes accessors in section-based nut config. files so that it's nice to use and consistent with NutConfiguration, UpsmonConfiguration and UpsdConfiguration config. classes (where it's done via Settable attributes). The GenericConfiguration class provides generic access to name/value items of

Hey everyone, I am developing a package and I am wondering if there is a good practice for naming classes, builders, attributes getters and setters when dealing with object composition. I know that it is usually a good practice to give to the builder the same name as the class and, if possible, to avoid to use upper case letters. My problem is that, when I build an object containing an other

Hi As we''re getting closer to a stable release of wxRuby, I''d like to get your views on the API style. There''s a survey here: http://rubyforge.org/survey/survey.php?group_id=35&survey_id=66 I''d like to know if you''d like to see two wxSugar syntax features become part of core, standard wxRuby version 2.0. These are: 1) Allow ruby-style

Hi Rubyists! I''m quite new to Ruby/Rails thing, so please be patient with me :) -------- (skip to next -------- if you want to quickly see the problem) I am learning by creating something like timetable application (like in school). There are days 1-5 and lessons 1-8. I have to db tables, subjects, which is the list of subjects, and subject_lessons, which is assocation of a subject to

Dear R developers, I come to you because nobody was able to answer the following request yet. I'm developing a release of BIOMOD package called biomod2 ( https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=302). I'm writing my package helps files and I'm not really satisfied by the visual results. I would like to make subsections in the package "function help index" file. I would

On 2008-12-30, at 21:07, Ranjit Jhala wrote: > thanks Chris and Gordon for the fantasic infrastructure and ocaml > bindings and Erick for the prompt response! > > I'm looking to use LLVM to write program analyses for > C/C++ programs, but to use Ocaml to write the analyses. > I did see there were bindings for iterating over: > > * functions in a module

Hello Apologies for cross-posting, the discussion should (if) go to R-devel, but I also want to reach the rcpp-devel people. My C++ class FOO is a module available through Rcpp, and it works fine and is -- so far -- bug free. With trying to further develop my R package, I thought it was a good idea to interface my C++ workhorse FOO with an S4 class Foo. After some long and not always insightful

Hello, I have again a "good practices"/programming theory question regarding data.frames. One of the fundamental objects that I use is the data frame with a particular set of columns that I would fill or get information from, and an entire system would revolve around getting information from or putting information to such data.frame. On a different OOP programming language I would be

This rule does not seem to be widely followed by Clang today. Looking at Parser and Sema, many getters (0 argument functions with names matching /^get[A-Z]/) return mutable references to long-lived objects. Looking through Decl.h, things are a little different: we rarely return references, but do frequently return pointers that provide mutable access to contained objects. On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at