similar to: Samba 3.0.0 beta3 available for download

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the second beta release of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. While we are significantly closer to the final release, you should be reminded that this is a non-production release provided for testing only. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/beta/ The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the second beta release of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. While we are significantly closer to the final release, you should be reminded that this is a non-production release provided for testing only. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/beta/ The

Thanks for replying to my question. However, I am still confused. Rafal Szczesniak <mimir@samba.org> wrote: >On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:58:30AM -0700, Matt Seitz wrote: >> The Samba web site contains "The Samba Team announces Samba 3.0.0 >> beta3". This document includes a section titled "Trust Relationships >> and a Samba Domain". For

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have built RPMs of samba3.0.0beta3, which are parallel-installable with samba-2.2.x (for easy testing, though you can change that by rebuilding the srpm with other options) for Mandrake 8.1 through 9.1, which are available on my site. I hope to get these up on the samba ftp servers soon, but if you desperatly need packages, grab them from the

Hi - My messages may not be reaching this list. Would someone at least confirm receipt of this message even if you have no suggestions/ comments re its content? I have sent several messages concerning mount.smbfs and I guess no one is using smbfs to mount a Windows machine -or- no one has encountered my problem. To recap the problem and give a solution: [problem] mount.smbfs is not working on

Samba 3.0beta2 does recognize the smb.conf parameter "ads server". [2003/07/02 10:00:01, 1] nsswitch/winbindd.c:main(811) winbindd version 3.0.0beta2 started. Copyright The Samba Team 2000-2003 [2003/07/02 10:00:01, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2380) Unknown parameter encountered: "ads server" [2003/07/02 10:00:01, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(3100)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the first beta release of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. While we are significantly closer to the final release, I will remind you that this is a non-production release provided for testing only. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/beta/ The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the first beta release of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. While we are significantly closer to the final release, I will remind you that this is a non-production release provided for testing only. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/beta/ The

Jitterbug is just what I want. Bugzilla is great but not for a non-programming (issue-tracking) audience. Can I get jitterbug somewhere please (it seems you have removed it) ? Cheers andy -- andy _______________________________________________ Andy Heath a.k.heath@shu.ac.uk

I had compiled and set up one 3.0beta2 server on S390 Linux, and successfully joined our Win2k AD domain. Everything was working well, and I went to rebuild Samba on Intel. When I tried to join the domain using my new build, net join complained about not being able to find the DC. net join -Uxxxxx%pppppp with debug level 5 results in the following: [2003/07/11 13:56:00, 3]

I've got samba-3.0.0-beta3-rc1 running, and am trying to connect to a Windows 2000 domain using security = ADS After following the instructions in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection, I've got kinit working, and am able to browse the Windows 2000 machines shares with smbclient //win2kmixed/c\$ -k without a password. However, if I try to connect to the machine, either through network neighborhood

I installed samba 3.0.0 beta3 on FreeBSD 5.0 alpha RELEASE, with ./configure --with-ldapsam --with-quotas --prefix=/usr/local/ldapsamba, the smbd log told me this: 2003/08/07 07:37:29, 0] lib/module.c:smb_load_module(40) Error loading module '/usr/local/ldapsamba/lib/pdb/ldapsam.so': Cannot open "/usr/local/ldapsamba/lib/pdb/ldapsam.so" [2003/08/07 07:37:29, 0]

Hi, I was getting an odd error installing rails-3.0.0.beta3 on a fresh Ubuntu 10.04 install. The same exact error was occurring on my Ubuntu 9.10 install, so I''m sure it isn''t something specific to the Ubuntu version (nor beta for that matter). This is the error: mike@ubuntu:~/rubygems-1.3.6$ sudo gem1.9.1 install rails --pre Successfully installed activesupport-3.0.0.beta3

I'm trying to setup a samba PDC and I seem to be missing a few pieces in the puzzle. I've reached the point where I've tried joining an XP workstation to the domain (yes, I've applied 3 changes to the registry that have been mentioned numerous times on the list). The domain join appears to work fine - I get back a nice box from the Windows machine welcoming me to the domain.

Hi list, I run a Samba-3.0.0beta3 / Heimdal-0.6 system and want it to be the BDC of our Win2003-controlled domain. The reason is that we had to move from our perfectly working samba-PDC to a windows system and I want to keep the user profiles on the old, but stronger, Linux box(now on SuSE8.2). I get(kinit) a ticket of the Win2003 without any problem, even for admin users. But If I try to connect

I''ve always distrusted the ruby and rails installs on my Mac (oOS X 10.6.3) -- sudo gem cleanup can''t seem to get rid of old gem versions (lots of Gem::InstallError: cannot uninstall). Because of that, I don''t trust the rails beta3 install I just completed. Here''s the story: * config is Apple''s ruby 1.8.7 and gem 1.3.6. * xcode is installed from

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the first release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use at your own risk. One of the main additions in this release is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the first release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use at your own risk. One of the main additions in this release is

I'm using samba3-beta3 successfully against a Win2000 AD domain controller, but cannot get winbind woking with a Win2003 AD domain controller. The samba log gives: [2003/08/02 17:35:51, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_negprot(1019) cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. [2003/08/02 17:35:51, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(1319) failed negprot Has

Hi, I have joined a ADS (W2003 server) with success. Started winbindd. When I run any wbinfo commands I recieve the following message in the logfile and the command fails: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. I am using the same smb.conf as for beta1 and beta2. What have changed or what have missed ? I am running on Solaris 9. My smb.conf file [global]