similar to: ACLs on domain members

Hi, I'm having trouble getting ACLs and samba to work on solaris. In a unix shell I can set and get the ACLs with setfacl and getfacl just fine. Connecting with a window machine (w2000/w2003) to samba lets me list the ACLs and even modify them. The problem is creating new ACLs. In the logs I get 20031029/local2.error:Oct 29 16:30:11 test1 smbd[5417]: [ID 702911 local2.error]

Hi, our company has for the last 3 years run a SAMBA PDC/Fileserver. Sadly circumstances dictate that we now need to move to an Active Directory infrastructure, and I want to migrate the existing PDC to a Samba3 ADS member server. All our SAMBA domain users have identical accounts on our AD domain, and I have successfully joined our SAMBA3 test box to the AD domain as a native ADS/Kerberos

Hi, I'm settin up a member Server in a samba domain. (both 3.0.24) getent passwd/group shows all user and groups wbinfo -u/g shows user and groups net groupmap list shows all groups correctly Here's the testparm output: Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER [global] workgroup = AAG server string = FILES (%v) security = DOMAIN password server = 192.168.100.72

Hi all, I have "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25" authenticating successfully against active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to set group permissions using the syntax of DOMAIN\group-name. For example: #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test

Time to take a step back: My original problem is that clients can no longer read or update their GPOs. gpupdate fails on the default domain policy, claiming it can't read some files. If I open said file via Explorer on the same user account, it works – with \\domain\sysvol\… as well as when browsing every single DC individually via \\foo-dc\sysvol\… It's hard to tell (I'm running

Everyone, I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others out there. I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing, Excel making files read only and extended attributes doing bizarre things. The solution revolved around what appears to be a change in how ACLs are managed.

On 01/05/18 23:59, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote: > > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, > to a regular fs and removing acl works as

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

Hello Everyone This samba server was working perfectly without problems. Running as an Domain member vs Win2K ADS One day it stopped working. All that happened 5 days ago was a change of the administrator/root password We adjusted the wbinfo -set-auth-user towards the new password. But nothing have worked since. install:/ # wbinfo -V Version 3.0.13-1.1-SUSE What might be wrong

I hav a problem porting my ACLS from my old filserver to a new one... My old Fileserver: I have my shares on a partition supporting acls with ext3 /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) My new Fileserver: /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext4 (rw,acl,user_xattr) Now I copied all my shares to the new Fileserver with rsync and backed up my acls with: getfacl -R

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

Hi all, 1) My NFS3 clients don't display or obey existing non-POSIX ACLs on files of NFS3-mounted exports. 2) setfacl on the client throws error and fails : # setfacl -m u:stowler:rw testfile.text setfacl: testfile.text: Operation not supported 3) at time of client mount the server's /var/log/messages shows "kernel: svc: unknown version (3)". Any thoughts greatly

I'm having trouble with ACL's and wonder how many others are too. I see conflicting answers and comments about different aspects of ACL's from many prople on the list. I was wondering if ANYONE is successfully using ACL's with Samba 3.0 or above. Questions I have that I'm sure many are asking are: Was your Samba server configured as the DC? What client OS were you

Hello samba team ! On my network, I mainly manage my AD users and computers from Unix using shell scripts. So I would like to set the shares' ACLs directly from the DC with the POSIX setfacl command. When exporting with NFSv4, the POSIX ACLs are conserved. I can set the permissions the same manner as for my local users. But on DC, the "rwx" right is mapped to "full

Ah, yes, oeps sorry, and i did run out of the office yesterday, so didnt see this.. 3000002:rwx 3000003:r-x wbinfo --uid-to-sid=3000003 S-1-5-11 wbinfo --uid-to-sid=3000002 S-1-5-18 wbinfo --sid-to-name=S-1-5-11 NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users 5 wbinfo --sid-to-name=S-1-5-18 NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 5 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

OK, I have RTFM. All the I could find. I cannot seem to set permissions via WINXP Pro explorer. No matter what I do all I get is access denied - even if I own the file. Samba log reveals: [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(326) larry opened file xghost.bin read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1102) Transaction 19 of length 188

Yes, LAN is the workgroup name. I made a test, i removed all the ACL with setfacl -b mysharename [root at fileserv]# getfacl share/ # file: share/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::rwx other::--- Going to Windows side and Added "Domain Admins" in permission tab to read/modify/total Security Tab is denied even for my others account in domain Admins group looking again

Hello you all, I am trying to set up a samba server with nt acl suport and i am having many troubles, help will be very apreciated. 1 - Is it possible to use acls only with the local users, no domains, no active directory, no winbind resolver (i just wanna work with users and groups that exist in this machine) ? 2 - I couldn't put samba to work, like i wanted (question 1), so i follow a

> root at graz-dc-sem.ad.tao.at# wbinfo --sid-to-name=S-1-5-11 > failed to call wbcLookupSid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND > Could not lookup sid S-1-5-11 So how fucked is my domain? On 2017-08-25 08:09, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Ah, yes, oeps sorry, and i did run out of the office yesterday, so didnt see this.. > > 3000002:rwx > 3000003:r-x > > wbinfo