similar to: Samba4 & Delegation

Hi, It has been a while that I did not come back to this topic, however I think I found a work-around for my initial problem. For information, what I was trying to do was: - Create an OU for a group of applications - Delegate control of this OU to a normal user (not helpdesk or domain admin) to be able to create groups and assign domain users to them The problem was, whenever I

Hello, Now that I have my Samba4 DC running great on CentOS6.4 I was wondering if somebody could help understand better how to install and configure Samba4 with winbind and PAM. I used the tutorial here: [http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind](http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind) This got me through to the point where "Using pam_winbind" starts.

Am 13.05.2013 14:53, schrieb daniel gonzalez: >> For doing it with ADUC, see here: >> >> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO/AD_Delegation#Delegating_.27Joining_Computers_to_the_domain.27-permissions > > Hello Marc, with ADUC don't work computers xp, only 7. It is working fine here for XP and Win7 in production and my test environment. The HowTo is

On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 06:24 -0700, daniel gonzalez wrote: > > > i need a practical example of samba-tool of delegation of > permissions ,for allow supporters to join machines to the > domain. > Use samba 4.0.5 > Thank you very much. > > I think this may be easier done using the Active Directory Users an

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

Alessio Cecchi wrote: [...] > Have you already try to run NFSv4? it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) > When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems > and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if > was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian

I''ve been working on a plugin called Http Test where I add HTML validation and link checking to controller and integration tests through an after filter in ApplicationController. I used to mix in a bunch of methods that I needed into the ApplicationController class, but to me this had a bad smell, so I broke much of the code out into separate classes that I delegate to.

Hi, Following that link https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/932455 we created a delegation to permit some group to add computers into AD. That works except if some computer with same name was already added (even if this computer with same name was previously cleanly removed from AD). Anyone who has idea what we missed? Cheers, M.

I ran samba-tool delegation show administrator and got this: athena:~# samba-tool delegation show administrator Account-DN: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=edm-inc,DC=com UF_TRUSTED_FOR_DELEGATION: False UF_TRUSTED_TO_AUTHENTICATE_FOR_DELEGATION: False Is this legit?? Shouldn't the domain administrator be true for these? -- Bob Wooldridge EDM Incorporated

just a quick update: no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes) instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-( -brd Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > >Alessio

Hello, We're a rather largish university (largest in Israel), with some 60-70k users, using Dovecot 1.2.14 (we're cautious about moving to 2.0.x for now). We need to provide admin rights to faculty computer/IT staff, so they can have access to the mailboxes of their respective users. We use LDAP as an authentication/authorization backend. Currently, dovecot has a "master

On 03/11/15 08:10, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > No, Davor. That won't work. The delegated user account is not member > of 'AD\Domain Admins' which is member of the group > 'SERVER\Administrators'. You have to use the username map to be able > to add the first AD-group or account to 'SERVER\Administrators'. > No, Davor, you don't have to use a

Hey Guys, Wanted to let you know about an event delegation library that interacts with Scriptaculous that we''ve used to make interactive UI elements with really clean code. We used it with Scriptaculous to create the scrolling widgets on the homepage of http://javascriptmvc.com/. It''s called Controller and it is an event delegation library that helps logically organize your

Hi, Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration? If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling

Thank you Louis, I'll have a try! And yep, you're so right about using groups rather than users, so that's what we did ;) I'll try to test that today and come back to tell yall how it went. Have nice week-end if I can't come back today : ) M. 2016-09-02 16:09 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org >: > Hai Mathias. > > I think you

On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on > your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of > write operations. > > If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, > this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot >

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

Back in January we upgraded/moved our domain from an old install of samba and openldap to a newer version (samba 3.5.10 and openldap 2.4.23) while also moving our domain to a new name. On the old domain, which was setup before I got here, our IT section was in an ldap group that allowed us to join PC's to the domain and when the prompt came up in windows to install software we could log in as

Hello, I do appologize if this is something that was already discussed somewhere else... but for now I was not able to find the appropriate How-To. Would anybody know what the IPTABLES entries are to have working Samba4 Domain Controller? I tried the following: -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 88 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 749 -j ACCEPT -A

Is there an DHCPv6 client in CentOS that supports prefix delegation correctly? The old version of dhclient can't set a requested prefix delegation length, so isn't very useful, and I can't get the even-older wide-dhcpv6 from EPEL to work. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>