similar to: Optimistic Locking Enhancements: Gem or Core?

Hello, to implement some some kind of optimistic locking, I want to build a view, where an object is displayed together with a link containing the data of the displayed object. My first try looked something like <%= object.object_discription %> <%= link_to "action", :action => "take_action", :data => object %> this won''t work because object is of

Hi, guys, I''m in the midst of moving an app from rails 2.3.8 to rails 3.0.9. Sadly, rails 3 no longer has javascript generators and I''m now forced to do more javascript. For my project, I have selected jQuery as the javascript framework for my rails 3.0.9 app. What I have done to have my app''s deletion link (for each item) trigger an alert box when the deletion

How do I make an ajax call and then update a div with a partial? I''ve tried this but it''s not working. Comment is created but the partial is not loaded. //view <a href="#" id="testlink">Testlink</a> <div id="commentlist"> </div> //controller def new @comment = Comment.new @comment.save

Hello, I am working on a project, and on one form we have a select (drop- down) box where the user needs to be able to select from a list of clients. The box is currently being populated with: <%= collection_select(:client, :id, @account.clients, :id, :name) %> The problem is that some of these clients may have already been selected, and we need to remove them from the list. Is this

I wrote in my view : #showcases - @category.showcases.each do |showcase| %a{''data-remote'' => ''true'', :href => "#{showcase_url(showcase)}"} .showcaseSelector{:style => "border-color: #{showcase == @selected_showcase ? ''black'' : ''transparent''}; background-color: ##{showcase[:color]};"} which

I just upgraded the second half of a two node puppetmaster cluster and now I am having issues with puppet-dashboard report processing. If I have workers running on both servers, they try to process each others reports, but since the report data file is not there, it fails. I would have assumed this data was local, not in the database. Does anyone else have this issue, or have a suggestion

Was going to have a variety of request params sent in and use a class_attribute that would define types of request parameters that are allowed. strong_parameters wouldn''t be too much trouble in such a case if it would allow me to manually permit some attributes (dynamically determined) in the controller but allow strong_parameters to enforce security of others. Is this something

Shouldn''t update_all be updating lock_version? As you can see from my console session below, it is upating the record (changed running attribute to true and returned 1 to show 1 recored was updated). But it did not increment lock_version. And optimistic locking is working correctly otherwise. As you can see below, lock version = 562 before and after the update_all call but it is

Hi WOW! Is Rails 3 another interesting learning curve. Just when I think I have a general working knowledge of Rails 2 ... things change. I''m trying to replicate the following in Rails 3: <%= link_to_remote image_tag("creditcard.png", :border => 0), :url => {:action => :make_payment, :type => "Credit", :id => @appt.id },

The documentation for Wx::FileDialog is incorrectly generated: http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/doc/filedialog.html Every time the ''*'' (for the wildcard character in file filters) appears, the doc instead switches between boldface and normal. Also, it seems like the links under "See also" are broken. Feature request: Regarding all modal common dialogs (ColourDialog,

All, I''ve written a simple job/opportunity tracking database app via RoR. I have about 10 internal users. Sometimes 2 people will want to update the same record at more or less the same time and they collide. In particular user 1 may edit a record, then get distracted, and finally an hour later they click save. During that hour user 2 may have pulled up the record, edited it, and

Here''s the code https://gist.github.com/dasibre/6786245 *new.js.erb file has the following js code* $(''a.pinbutton'').on(''click'', function() { $(this).parent().append(''<%= escape_javascript(render("select")) %>'') }); *here''s the player index with the new link* <%= link_to "Pin",

This is a new branch of an old thread, made necessary because the email system here purges sent messages after a period of time so I can't reply to the last message in the thread. The operative portion of that last message (retrieved from the archives and dated July 3, 2023) follows: /*****/ So I set up a fresh key to use for this test, and gave it similar parameters. I wasn't aware of

Hi everyone, I have a order with order_lines use case. On changing the lines, I want to be sure no one else changed the order. So I use lock_version on the order. This works fine if something is changed on the order record. But now i have the situation that I delete, alter and add order lines without changing the order record itself. I have to check and increment the order#lock_version however

Hi All, I''m having some trouble deciding when and how to implement optimistic locking. Let''s say I have a multiuser Rails app, and let''s say it stores, among other things "vital" customer information. The standard methods created by the Rails generate scaffold script look like this: def edit @customer = Customer.find(params[:id]) end

Hi, Is there a way to tell Rails that the magic field name for optimistic database locking is not lock_version? I have a legacy database where the optimistic locking field is named "version". Thanks, Phil -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have not been able to access the UJS site, http://www.ujs4rails.com/ for two days. Does that mean there are problems or that it has been incorporated into Rails core? In general, what do you think of using UJS instead of RJS? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

On 05.07.23 18:01, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote: > It appears the forced command either does not run or runs to completion > and exits immediately, as there is no process named "receive.ksh" in > the process tree. FWIW, two cents of mine: -- The script *exiting* should *not* prompt sshd to execute the requested subsystem "as a second thought", or else it'd happen

Hi all I have a Model like this: class Member < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :username, :email, :first_name, :last_name end I have created a scaffold using script/generate scaffold member members Using the URL localhost:3000/members/edit/1 I can edit all attributes, including created_at, lock_version etc.! But it should only show the attributes I listed in attr_accessible! What

On 06.07.23 23:37, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote:> So changing the forced command as stated will break the application. I > would need to create a test bed to simulate the listener rather than > use the server as is, where is. That may produce false or misleading > results. Since the forced command is tied to the specific keypair in the authorized_keys, you could -- test with a different