similar to: update_attribute, update_column and update_columns should update readonly attributes

Hmm. When using update_attribute from within a worker method, it seems that Backgroundrb inserts null values into all attributes that are not explicitly set. Is this possible/true?

Anybody know why this: User.find(current_user).update_attribute(:last_subject, params[:subject_id]) results in this: AREL (0.6ms) UPDATE "users" SET "last_subject" = 4, "encrypted_password" = ''f470e6e76203973146c3b07e8b31c976b19cb23a9bf37485ad1911687cdc7a29'', "updated_at" = ''2011-10-12 13:43:21.727558'' WHERE

Hello again... so I narrowed my problem down. For some reason, while using login_generator, any User object I pull from the DB can be updated one attribute at a time using update_attribute, but when I try and do update_attributes it fails every time. Is this a limitation with login_generator that I don''t know about, or is there a way around this? I also tried the .update method and

I am sure this is doable but I can''t find a specific example and my brain is frazzled. Basically, I am doing a whole load of in-place editing and need methods to support the updates. Here is what I am doing now: def set_blog_website faq = Faq.find(params[:id]) faq.blog_website = params[:value] faq.save! @faq = faq do_ret end Surely there is a generic way I can

Just in case it saves someone else the several hours of insanity I just went through, update_attributes will not save unless the model validations are satisfied, but update_attribute (the singular form) will save the attribute to the database even if the model validations would fail! This appears to be a feature, not a bug (http://api.rubyonrails.com/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html) although

Does anyone know of a way to update individual attributes with validation? update_attribute disables the validation checks in the record model, so I''m wondering if there''s a workaround for this. In my application, I want to allow the user to update some or all the attributes without having to enter :password and :password_confirmation, both of which are subject to

I know the debate of whether this should validate has been rehashed many times. My question is, what are the consequences of overriding this method to force validation? Will this break fundamental things? Will it break plugins? Is there a reason not to have a strict validation option? In my code I will never use this as I consider it a terribly broken method, but some gems use it and in one case

Hi, I was reading the messages at <http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/2005-December/006969.html> http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/2005-December/006969.html, Subject: [Rails] update_attribute send updates every field, why? Well, I am having the same problem, and I do have a binary column where I am storing files. Also, I am calling a web service so I can send the

i can not get update to work via controller/server. it works via console ??? this is what i get when i run it Club Load (0.005893) SELECT * FROM clubs WHERE (clubs."id" = 3) SQL (0.000570) BEGIN SQL (0.000454) COMMIT club.update_attributes(:state => "CA") or Club.update(3, :state => "CA") what am i overlooking?

Hi begin ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do pb_status_history = ProblemStatusHistory.new pb_status_history.problem_id = @problem.id pb_status_history.problem_status_id = @problem.problem_status_id pb_status_history.save! ret_val=@problem.update_attribute("problem_status_id",''ab'') if ret_val==false

If I am changing a boolean value, no matter what approach I take, I get the same results: lets say table "users" has an "enabled" field that is boolean: user = User.find(1) user.enabled.toggle NoMethodError: undefined method `toggle'' for false:FalseClass user = User.find(1) toggle(user.enabled) NoMethodError: undefined method `toggle'' for

My server is running Rails 2.3.4...am I not doing this correctly or is something borked? >> c=Contact.last => #<Contact id: 24, name: "Larry", email: "larry-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org", phone: 2147483647, account_id: 8, created_at: "2009-11-27 18:16:25", updated_at: "2009-11-27 18:40:08", hide_name: false, hide_phone: false,

When LLVM's configure finds a usable <pthread.h>, it prefers to use that rather than the home-grown stuff. However if LLVM is configured with --disable-pthreads, both mingw flavors produce the same results. BTW, I've tried to quantify the slowdown: a quick test indicates that LLVM build that uses pthreads is about 10% slower than the one which doesn't. This is less that I

Hi Yaron, Not sure I understand your question. Wasn't <mutex> one of the more important C++11 features that LLVM would like to use? On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > Vadim, > > Thanks for the feedback on the -win32. A dependency on a small DLL with > BSD license does not sound too bad, but performance regression is

Hi, recover() sends all its messages, which I consider to be error messages, to stdout. I think they more properly belong to stderr. This is an important difference for those of us who use R in batch mode to generate ASCII files. Thanks, Vadim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Thank you for the reference to Knuth. Indeed in vol. 2 he has a > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Plate [mailto:tplate@blackmesacapital.com] > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:05 AM > To: Vadim Ogranovich > Subject: Re: [Rd] algorithm reference for sample() > > Have you tried looking in Knuth's books on computer > algorithms? (They are classics for good

Well, "integer" is also a storage.mode in R. It is not immediately clear which meaning the help page uses. I guess some extra elaboration would be helpful. Anyway, thank you for the clarification, Vadim > -----Original Message----- > From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 9:54 AM > To: Vadim Ogranovich > Cc:

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:53:39PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe at redhat.com> writes: > > > > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:53:39PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote: > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe at redhat.com> writes: > > > > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at

On 6/21/12 2:23 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi John, > >> Are functions marked as readnone or readonly in the LLVM IR allowed to >> generate output or to exhibit exceptional behavior (e.g., calling >> abort(), generating an MMU fault, etc.)? > they are allowed to unwind exceptions for example, since in theory this > can occur without scrunching externally visible memory