similar to: Nested Resource Route Helpers

(I posted this as a bug in GitHub (https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/7018), but then someone there told me I should post it here, so here it is.) If you set attr_accessible on some properties in an ActiveRecord-descended class, and then attr_protected on others - the class becomes ''default-open'' - if any properties are missed or added later, they will be accessible by

What''s the best way to exclude ActiveRecord in Rails3? In Rails2, one could just do: *config.frameworks -= [ :active_record ]* in the configuration block in environment.rb. Is it possible in Rails3? Thanks. Anuj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to

Along the same lines as the default javascript library discussion [1], why don''t we switch the default test library to RSpec? The stats [2] posted by Xaviar in the other thread seem to support that RSpec is the preferred way to test. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/e9b9cf2233d9a59b [2] http://survey.hamptoncatlin.com/survey/stats -- You received

My friend Ben Willis and I have developed a gem for the versioning of Rails views. https://github.com/bwillis/versioncake The versioning is done by the naming convention. Image the following series of files : show.v3.json.jbuilder show.v2.json.jbuilder show.v1.json.jbuilder create.v2.json.jbuilder create.v1.json.jbuilder The developer pre-defines all view versions in their config. When a

I am trying to create a form for processing credit cards. For the credit card expiration date, I would like to leave the day field out of the form for obvious reasons. However, the following code is producing an error for me. Any ideas? Thanks! <p><label for="email">Expiration</label><br/> <input type="hidden" id="user_card_expiration_3i"

I just created the sass directory in my stylesheets directory and when I reload my page I get this error: Status: 500 Internal Server Error Permission denied - /Users/Justin/kicksite/trunk/public/ stylesheets/ application.css /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/haml-2.0.0/lib/sass/plugin.rb: 72:in `initialize'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/haml-2.0.0/lib/sass/plugin.rb: 72:in

Is there any reason why db:setup and db:reset don''t show any more on "rake -T db"? I guess any rake task that is defined only as a group of other tasks (without any ruby blocks attached) presents this problem. Also let me write this as a remember note to myself for when I have some time: the Rails Guides on Migrations should be updated to include instructions about db:load

Hi Guys, I just realize that on the API documentation the code snippet is overflowing off the screen. Is this an intended behavior? Or who should I contact to get this one fixed. You can see the screenshot here: http://skitch.com/sikachu/dw82n/screen-shot-2553-08-30-at-16.24.26 Thanks :) Prem Sichanugrist -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby

Do you know of any way for me to stick a meta tag in using a before_filter or after_filter or around_filter? <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5"/> I have been trying to figure out out and just cannot make sense of it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hello, I have a suggestion to improve the Rails Lighthouse overview page. At present the description is very large. You need to scroll to find the tickets and more importantly the list of pages. I think a shorter description along the lines of http://i48.tinypic.com/2z6a7lt.png would be much better. All the information at present in the description can be moved into pages, and they can be linked

When creating a new rails project (3.1.0.rc1) with no test unit options, it still create test unit rake tasks. rails new my_project --skip-test-unit rails g : TestUnit: test_unit:controller test_unit:helper test_unit:integration test_unit:mailer test_unit:model test_unit:observer test_unit:performance test_unit:plugin test_unit:scaffold Is this correct ?? -- You received

Hey guys, This is the final list of the new maintainers of each plugin. We need two more things to do: First please the owners of the repos add the rest of the maintainers. Second I will add a note on each rails/plugin mentioning this repos updates. So from now on, if someone else is interested in helping/contributing please send a message to the appropriate repo owner. verification

Hello guys, I went into milestones page (https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/milestones) and found out that Rails 2.3.6 was due Jan 15, 2010. Does it mean all tickets in that milestone should be cleared first? If so, then I would pay attention to clear tickets in that bucket first. Thank you, Prem Sichanugrist (sikachu) -- You received this message because you are

Yes, I know that Rails *2.3.x* is no longer fully supported (this is why I''m posting it to rails/issues). Still, I would like to post the topic so that everyone who experience the same problem could quickly google for it (no, afaik no solution for this yet). I''m trying to migrate a 1.5 years *2.3.x* app from Ruby version *1.8.7* to * 1.9.3-p0*. The strange problem I

Hi everyone, I would need to know if RoR follow any policy for version naming; I mean, something like linux´s kernel does or similar. For instance, kernel uses numbers separated in groups by dots (i.e. pre 2.6 - AA.BB.CC). These groups mean differents fixtures, bugs fixed... I will start a big proyect from scratch with rails and I want to choose now a standart to use and avoid future problems

There''s been some great stuff added to edge since 2.0.2. Any chance it might be wrapped up into a 2.1 release? Cheers Chris -- ---------------- http://pushrod.wordpress.com -- old dogs, new tricks http://autopendium.com -- a place your old car can call home --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

I found out today that Range#include? behaves differently on 1.9 than on 1.8 ( http://rhnh.net/2009/08/03/range-include-in-ruby-1-9 ) In order to deal with various edge cases, instead of just checking whether range.first <= value <= range.last, in ruby 1.9 include? steps through all the values in the range, checking for equality. This is of course a lot slower - in my case, checking a date

Just running through the first little project (depot) in ''Agile Web Development with Rails''. It isn''t scaffolding like it says it should in the book. After running: >rails -d mysql depot then SQLing: drop table if exists products; create table products ( id int not null auto_increment, title varchar(100) not null, description text not null, image_url varchar(200)

So thanks to Craig, i got up and running on rails 2.2.2, though now i''m dealing with a whole new can of worms. I''ve done a good bit o searching and haven''t found any solid leads. I''m using the simple_captcha plugin on my site, and all is well until i call that plugin. http://www.pastie.org/347721 ActionView::TemplateError (undefined method

Forms without explicit enctype are submitted as application/x-www-form- urlencoded. This is the default behaviour in Rails. However, this enctype does not allow transmission of binary data (files). Would it not make sense to specify the enctype multipart/form-data by default instead? i.e. all the form_for helpers would add this enctype to the form tag, unless overriden by the developer. This