similar to: Update Rails on Rack documentation

Hi, guys, I got the below error message when i typed this command in terminal "rackup config.ru" , the file config.ru is rails ''s configuration file. You have already activated rack 1.3.2, but your Gemfile requires rack 1.2.3. Consider using bundle exec. (Gem::LoadError) So, how should i do , thanks a lot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Hi, A couple days ago, I was trying to run Unicorn for Ramaze, and found that `Unicorn.run'' didn''t share the same interface with other Rack handlers, i.e. `options[:Host]'' and `options[:Port]'' Because of this, I can''t just use: Rack::Handler.register(''unicorn'', ''Unicorn'') And invoke this:

Has anyone seen anything like this before? I can get it to happen all the time if I issue a HEAD request, but it only happens very intermittently on GET requests. I''m using Ruby 1.9.2p180. Any ideas on where to start debugging? 204.93.223.151, 10.195.114.81 - - [11/Aug/2011 21:03:50] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 37902 0.5316 app error: Content-Length header was 37902, but should be

=== 1. Camping on Rack === I''ve just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the "core". I got rid of (a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un-necessary files (lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb & mongrel.rb). bin/camping does now only provide WEBrick, Mongrel and console-support and should only be used in development. It uses Rack::ShowExceptions to catch

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients. * http://unicorn.bogomips.org/ * mongrel-unicorn at

--- man/man1/unicorn.1 | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- man/man1/unicorn_rails.1 | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/man1/unicorn.1 b/man/man1/unicorn.1 index 0b496af..749272a 100644 --- a/man/man1/unicorn.1 +++ b/man/man1/unicorn.1 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ unicorn - a rackup-like command to launch the Unicorn HTTP

I am trying to convert my codeand to use the new Rails 2.0 feature RequestForgeryProtection but I get an InvalidAuthenticityToken error, right from the beginning with my login form.. I followed the recommandations : in my environment.rb config.action_controller.session = { :session_key => ''myappname'', :secret =>

Installing from RubyGems.org: gem install --pre unicorn >From db919d18e01f6b2339915cbd057fba9dc040988b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:02:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] unicorn 4.6.0pre1 - hijacking support This pre-release adds hijacking support for Rack 1.5 users. See Rack documentation for more information about hijacking.

Has anybody succeed in getting Rails 3 to work in production? I am trying with Apache 2.2 and Passenger 2.2.12 but no luck. If you have got Rails three to work in production on any server with any set up could you please post the details (howto?) or a link to where such information can be found. All input gratefully received. Paul Thompson -- You received this message because you are

Hi. Today i updated passenger to new 2.2.7 version and my app started to work incorrectly, because it lauched in development environment. I tried to set "RailsEnv production", "RackEnv production" at my httpd.conf, but this dont work. So, maybe somenthing wrong with my config.ru? #!/usr/bin/env rackup -p3000 require "config/environment" use Rails::Rack::LogTailer

Signaling using normal kill(2) is preserved, but the master now prefers to signal workers using a pipe rather than kill(2). Non-graceful signals (:TERM/:KILL) are still sent using kill(2), as they ask for immediate shutdown. This change is necessary to avoid triggering the ubf (unblocking function) for rb_thread_call_without_gvl (and similar) functions extensions. Most notably, this fixes

Hello all, Last week, I finally decided to put into motion some ideas I''ve been kicking around for a year in my head since last year... Basically I don''t want to have to deal with threads or support platforms that rely on or encourage threads. Especially given MRI 1.9 where kernel threads are more difficult to debug than green ones. Given the limited scope of this project,

Quiero dar de baja mi suscripción, por favor. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have a puppetmaster running within passenger+rack. It has been running properly for almost a year and decided to stop working on the weekend. Now I''m getting the Purple "Ruby (Rack) application could not be started" screen with Error: no such file to load -- rack Application: /data1/rack/puppetmaster The backtrace is uninspiring. Snippets include:

I''m trying to use Camping from Magnus'' repo (1.9.300) but running the blog.rb example (or anything for that matter) gives me Rack::Lint::LintError at / Content-Length header was 0, but should be 548 Ruby C:/ruby-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-0.9.1/lib/rack/lint.rb: in assert, line 16 Web GET localhost/ There are no errors on the camping output so I suspect something has

Hi, unicorn unconditionally sets rack.multiprocess to true in the Rack environment. The Rack spec [0] says the following about the variable: "true if an equivalent application object may be simultaneously invoked by another process, false otherwise." When unicorn is running with a single worker this does not hold so what do you think about setting the variable to false when only a

I redirect the user of my application to Twitter for oauth style authentication using my app''s request_token. The user is able to enter username and password on Twitter''s page BUT then, instead of calling back my application, Twitter displays a page

Hey, I''m not sure I fully appreciate the best use(s) for Rack apps (e.g., Sinatra apps) in a Rails (3.1) application... Scenario: I have in mind a bunch of RESTful controller actions linked to models -- all for providing an API. Approach 1: handle each resource from its own mounted Rack app: + ''Rails 3 in Action'' advises mounted rack apps for Rails APIs because they

Hey - I need your input regarding a problem I''ve come across. I''ll first explain what the problem is, and what I think the solution is. If I misunderstood how things work, please let me know. # The problem I''m using Dragonfly (on-the-fly file processing) to serve images. Dragonfly uses Rack::Cache to cache the processed images so subsequent requests are served by

Hi All, my server is having rack gems as: rack (1.2.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.0) when i run the following command in my project/vendor/gems folder: gem unpack rack-1.0.0 It shows the following error message: Error: Gem ''rack-1.0.0'' not installed. Any idea on this?? Thanks, Saurabh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are