similar to: What is the point of using :format in routes?

Is there any way to prevent Rails 3 from using an ORM? In Rails 2, it used to have a description in environments.rb explaining how to do that. In Rails 3, is there any way to tell it to not use any database? I was trying to make some benchmarks from situations that don''t require a database... Thanks in advance, Rodrigo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Hi folks - Seeing a weird problem and would love some help. It''s documented in http://pastie.org/278310 to be more readable. In short, I have a caches_page "action", :if => {stuff} but the :if is never being called - the action is just caching every time. (If I put a debugger call in the :if block, it never stops.) If I replace caches_page with caches_action, the if

Is there any reason why db:setup and db:reset don''t show any more on "rake -T db"? I guess any rake task that is defined only as a group of other tasks (without any ruby blocks attached) presents this problem. Also let me write this as a remember note to myself for when I have some time: the Rails Guides on Migrations should be updated to include instructions about db:load

Running "rake assets:clobber assets:precompile" will generate files like "application-xxx.css" with incorrect urls after upgrading to Rails 4. For example url(/fields/xxx.png) when it should be url(/assets/fields/xxx.png). For some unknown reason it worked once in development mode, but after running rake assets:clobber I can''t get it to work again... Any ideas

Is there any reason why AR has never supported foreign-key constraints? I can understand the lack of support for triggers and stored procedures since they are highly dependent on the database to create a wrap API around them. But this is not the case for foreign keys. This is specially important for open-source projects like Redmine/Chiliproject and Gitorious where you shouldn''t be

I''m testing ruby-head through rvm but can''t get ''ação''.mb_chars.upcase == ''AÇÃO''... I get ''AçãO'' instead... This happens both for Rails 2.3.5 and Rails 3 beta 3... How can I get upcase to work correctly? Thanks in advance, Rodrigo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby

Hi all, In response to Rodrigo Rosas''s message about mb_chars.upcase not giving the expected result on 1.9, I''ve done some work in a fork to make String#mb_chars always return an instance of a proxy class, both with Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9. The end result of the patch is (hopefully) to make Rails'' multibyte functionality behave the same way in 1.8.7 and 1.9.x.

Dear all great developers. I wonder if there is any work being done or thoughts being shared regarding prepared SQL statements. Currently I am in heavy need of tuning SQL INSERTS that insert large (3MB) images into blobs. I am using rails 2.3.5 with postgres adapter and pg driver. Any information would be appreciated. Jarl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Recently I''ve found out some mentions to the "--sandbox" parameter to the "rails console" command. And I found the idea interesting, but since I''m using Sequel instead of ActiveRecord I guessed this wouldn''t work for me. But after talking about this subject in the Sequel mailing list, Jeremy Evans has brought to my attention that there are some

I had to update several gems for Bundler to accept it but now I''m stuck: bundle update rails devise knockoutjs-rails sass-rails coffee-rails devise-encryptable oojs Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/....... Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/.. Resolving dependencies... Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "railties": In Gemfile:

Even with Spork, my requests specs are very slow to start running (about 7 seconds). I suspect Rails is booting each time I run "rspec -X spec/requests". Is that true? If so, is there any way I could instruct the web server to keep alive after the specs run so that it would be faster on next run? Are there any resources on how to have better performance on running requests specs

My specs work fine with this in my Gemfile.lock: grep rspec Gemfile.lock rspec (2.11.0) rspec-core (~> 2.11.0) rspec-expectations (~> 2.11.0) rspec-mocks (~> 2.11.0) rspec-core (2.11.0) rspec-expectations (2.11.1) rspec-mocks (2.11.1) rspec-rails (2.11.0) rspec (~> 2.11.0) rspec-rails (~> 2.11) After "bundle update

i have created some ''public'' controllers like so: ./script/generate controller example and an ''admin'' controller like this: ./script/generate controller admin/example now i want to have caching in the ''public'' controllers so i add something like this: caches_action :show, :whatever but i want the ''admin'' controller to do

https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/12374#issuecomment-29446761 Here in discussion I proposed to deprecate JS responder because this technique is insecure and not pragmatic way to transfer data. It can be exploited in this way http://homakov.blogspot.com/2013/05/do-not-use-rjs-like-techniques.html i find this bug very often so i know what i''m talking about. With it attacker can

Hi all, I am new to ROR world. I know the REST conceptually but find the difficulties in implementation can anybody guide me that which is the best book which i have to read. also some good links of implementation of rest in ROR. If anybody made a small application to restful in rails please forward me that application. i found some demo but i didn''t understand for what purpose they

Hi, i just wanted to say my sorries in advance (sorrie/sorry/sorri)...i have just started learning about the subject of caching, but unfortunately haven''t effictively managed to implement what i had learned. obviously it''s possible to cache a whole page, or action with the caches_page :x or caches_action :y methods, but for some reason it hasn''t really worked with

Hi Folks, There is much discussion where I work at present regarding migrations, and the ''correct'' usage or not of them. TL;DR Should migrations be used just to modify schema, and other ''deploy'' tasks done other ways? If yes, how to ensure no repeat runs of such tasks (seeds, jobs etc) Background Once you''re live there are often additional things

If so, shouldn''t it be documented in the Rails API? Or is there a better way to allow class reloading of my files under lib. I mean, I know about config.autoload_paths, but I want to be explicit about my requires. I just want to be able to reload then on each request when I''m working on them. require_dependency seems to do just that but I''m worried since it is not

I''m trying to expire all pages under my view action. These could be /controller/view/1 or /controller/view/1/2 how can I expire all pages under /controller/view/? There must be a way, but I''m stumped. Here''s my broken attempt. Thanks in advance for any help,suggestions, or directions to a how to page. expire_action(:controller =>

ZOMG HAPPY TUESDAY (UTC-7)!!! <3<3<3<3<3 I am happy to announce that the first release candidate for Rails 3.0.6 has been pushed to rubygems.org. ## Release Candidate: What does it mean? The release candidate is very similar to what we will actually release for version 3.0.6. The reason that we release an RC is so that the community can have a chance to postpone or veto commits