similar to: Writing test for CacheHelper

Hello, i want to use speex out of visual basic. So i have written a few wrapper functions in VC++ (v6) wich i can call from VB (v6). But i have problems with the encode and decode functions. Encode wrapper Function: I want to copy the value of an single array in VB to a float array in C which can be encoded. And the output of the encoder have to be unsigned char because in VB its an byte

FWIW, I'd be interested in working on the Windows implementation. I've been knee-deep in *nixes lately and wouldn't mind the refresher. :) Gordon Keiser Software Development Engineer Arxan Technologies w:+1.765.889.4756 gkeiser at arxan.com www.arxan.com<http://www.arxan.com/> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Nick

On May 8, 2012, at 3:52 AM, Gordon Keiser wrote: > FWIW, I'd be interested in working on the Windows implementation. I've been knee-deep in *nixes lately and wouldn't mind the refresher. J Cool! Does my proposed interface make sense to implement on top of Windows APIs? -Nick > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new > llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: > > /// OutputBuffer - This interface provides simple way to create an in-memory > /// buffer which when done will be written to a file. During the lifetime > of >

hey I am able to do: block_func(x, y) do .... end But if I try to do this: form.block_func(x, y) do .... end I get an error like this: syntax error, unexpected '')'' @output_buffer.concat " "; @output_buffer.concat (( form.block_func(x, y) do ).to_s); @output_buffer.concat "\n" Any ideas? thanks

On May 8, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 8, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: >>> For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new >>> llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: >>>

On May 8, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: >> For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new >> llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: >> >> /// OutputBuffer - This interface provides simple way to create an in-memory >> /// buffer

From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> Fix several calls to more_printf() as eventually printf() is called without a literal string which generate warnings with gcc and lead to errors when -Werror is active. Signed-off-by: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> The message "format not a string literal and no format arguments" at first seems strange but by doing this change

For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: /// OutputBuffer - This interface provides simple way to create an in-memory /// buffer which when done will be written to a file. During the lifetime of /// these objects, the content or existence of the specified file is undefined. /// That is, creating an OutputBuffer

I'm not sure if anyone is experienced with this but i'm having very strange issues with implementing speex in my iOS application. I have written a encode and decode function basically exactly like the example files online. To process audio I am using an iOS VoiceProcessingIO Audio Unit which is set at 16bit pcm with 8000 sample rate. After buffering 320 bytes of PCM audio I feed it into

Hi everyone, I'm trying to encode/decode with speex, when I do not, the audio is loud and clear, but when I encode/decode to test audio quality, I get a really poor audio quality and a robotic sound. Here's my init audio method : #define AUDIO_QUALITY 10 - (void) initAudio { try { //SPEEX CONFIG speex_bits_init(&bits_in);

Hi I apologise if the following message is inappropriate for this list. However, I feel this is the only place where I can get some help with my problem. BOOL CALLBACK RecordProc(HRECORD hRecord, void *buffer, DWORD length, DWORD user) { try { long sent = 0; long inputOffset = 0; long outputOffset = 0; long nbBytes = 0; char *outputBuffer = NULL;

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:03 PM, <katya.romanova at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Look at my replies inline (below your comments). > > Katya. > > > > *From:* stevenwu at apple.com <stevenwu at apple.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM > *To:* Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> > *Cc:* Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at

The code was passing sizeof(char *) - not the length of the buffer - to memset. Change the function to take the length of the buffer as a parameter. Fixes the warning: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to provide an explicit length? Signed-off-by: Jonathan Boeing <jonathan.n.boeing at gmail.com> ---

Hello, I'm new on DSP and i want to implant speex echo canceller on the Blackfin DSK version of speex to work on the BF533 EZ-KIT LITE But i can perform the echo canceller to work This is my code, so if somebody can tell me where i'm wrong //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- // CallBackFunction() - Gets called by the audio pseudo-driver

> On Mar 26, 2018, at 6:03 PM, katya.romanova at sony.com wrote: > > Hi Steven, > Look at my replies inline (below your comments). > Katya. > > From: stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com> <stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com>> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM > To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com

Hi All, Rails 0.12.1 doesn''t seem to be able to handle requests that don''t provide the HTTP_HOST variable in my environment (apache2/fcgi). This isn''t really a huge deal in practice, but it points to an actual oversight in the code, or perhaps in my config. Thoughts? ActionView::TemplateError (undefined method `+'' for nil:NilClass) on line #1 of

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:34 PM, <katya.romanova at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > > Thank you for the clarification J. > > > > I’m sure you have a very good understanding of how much efforts it will > take to write a patch for legacy C LTO to implement caching the same way > it’s done in new C++ LTO API. How easy/difficult do you think it will be >

Hi Steven and Peter, I think we resolved all the misunderstanding/concerns that we had with the proposal and decided that we don’t have to implement heavy-weight synchronization solutions (such as read-write locks, etc). Lightweight solution is expected to work on MacOS and Windows (however, there might be issues with Windows supporting non-NTFS file systems). There are two options for the

Any idea what might be wrong? ActionView::Template::Error (undefined method `+@'' for #<ActionView::OutputBuffer:0x00000002e51580>): -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to