similar to: Surprise in (delete_all | clear | destroy_all) on association

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70 matches similar to: "Surprise in (delete_all | clear | destroy_all) on association"

2006 Nov 04
0
Model.delete_all vs Model.destroy_all in a habtm
Hi there I have an habtm association between 2 Models. I regularly have to truncate the table on one side of the relationship and repopulate the table with a fresh csv file. I notice that f I do Model.delete_all, none of the records in my habtm join table get deleted, whereas if I use destroy_all they do. However, the overhead of using destroy_all is too great. For the amount of records I have
2006 Jan 04
3
ActiveRecord delete_all With Sanitized Parameters?
Hi there I''m trying to delete a set of active record objects based on certain conditions. I''d like to do something like the following: Context.delete_all("uri IN (?)", uris) But delete_all doesn''t allow multiple arguments. Since I don''t have the IDs for the objects I want to delete, I can''t use delete(id), and have resorted to this,
2007 Jan 23
2
Understanding :dependent => :delete_all?
I can''t see what''s wrong here but that''s probably just because I''m so new to Rails! To get right into it... I have 4 tables that look like this: Sites - id Projects - id - site_id - user_id Tasks - id - project_id - user_id Users - id The corresponding models: class Site < ARB has_many :projects, :dependent => :delete_all end class Project <
2006 Mar 29
2
delete_all not resetting auto incement in database
Hey I''m writing a simple admin interface thats reading user data (skills) from a comma separated file. To clear the database before inserting new skills, I use Skill.delete_all Then I insert the new values I read from a file. Everything goes well up to the point where I see that auto-generated ID''s are not starting from 1. They start off at 840 (responding to the number of
2006 Jul 26
7
Delete_all causes a deadlock on MSSQL database ???
Hi all, When i use the ''delete_all'' function to remove a few rows from my database, it causes a deadlock on the sql server. The delete seems to be successful, it then redirects to the ''view'' page, and the record does appear to be deleted as far as the ''view'' rails page shows. BUT if i go into sql query analyser, i can''t do a
2003 Dec 27
2
holiday surprise
Sometimes people call it "Magic Lubricant". Sometimes - "Power Bottle". Why? An amazing erection WITHING SEVERAL SECONDS is guaranteed to you! Double-strengthed orgasm and full satisfaction... I guess this is excatly what are waiting from sex! Your easy-to-use solution is here: [1]http://www.dubnh.us/vpoil/?utopia ----- Link below is for that
2013 Aug 06
0
surprise)))
Once I make up my mind I'm full of indecision.Levant(C) http://studiafasadov.ru/gatherit.php Le titre le plus respectable de la noblesse francaise c-est de descendre immediatement de quelques-uns de ces trente mille hommes casques cuirasses brassardes cuissardes qui sur de grands chevaux bardes de fer foulaient aux pieds huit ou neuf millions d-hommes nus qui sont les ancetres de la nation
2012 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] another SCEV surprise
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com> wrote: > When compile the following case and look at the SCEV analysis, I notice that > the first two loops don't have a LoopInvariantBackedgeTakenCount > (surprising) and the last one does (not surprising, except in the context of > the first two examples). > > void p4(int *A, int *B, long
2006 Jun 15
0
Surprise!!! New sound files auto-downloaded to my system
Sometime in the last 10 days the SVN build system (or was it the stable build system?) changed to dynamically download the soundfiles instead of including them with the downloaded code. I didn't get any prompt the the soundfiles were about to be downloaded, and to my great surprise on the next trip I made into voicemail, I now have an entirely new set of sounds on my system. I don't
2016 Jun 24
0
what a surprise
Hi, It is so exciting to tell you about what happened yesterday, you should better read it yourself <http://rdankistycha.hhotechnologies.com/aeighl> Good wishes, brian at derocher.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20160624/ffa15d73/attachment-0001.html>
2001 Oct 11
1
A Pleasant Surprise
Since RC2 was released, I've started re-building the music library I left behind at my previous job (all my stuff from CDs, ripped into MP3s). Recently I started an aggressive campaign of converting my CDs to vorbis files... I'm doing about 6 or 7 CDs a day at work =) Yesterday I was listening to my Talk Talk album, and noticed that on this one live track, the stereo seemed to have
2007 Mar 29
0
S4 generic surprise
I discovered the following behavior when source'ing the same file repeatedly as I edited it. My generic stopped acting like a generic. I can't tell from the docs what, if any, behavior is expected in this case. R 2.4.0 > foo <- function(object) 3 > isGeneric("foo") [1] FALSE > setMethod("foo", "matrix", function(object) 4) Creating a new
2005 Nov 18
0
Surprise when mapping matrix to image
Hello, I wonder if image(t(x)[ncol(x):1, ]) can do the job correct! perhaps this does the job better: image(t(x)[,nrow(x):1]) Bj??rn From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk> Date: Fri 27 Aug 2004 - 06:43:50 EST On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Glynn, Earl wrote: > Start with: > > > x <- c(1:7,1) > > dim(x) <- c(2,4) > > x > [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] >
1999 Jun 25
0
ACLs and least surprise (was Samba vs. NetAppliance)
[This is fairly far from the topic of the mailing-list: we may want to take further discussion to email or the tech list] Jeremy writes: > it violates the principle of > least suprises for the nfs user. ie. They may get access > denied when the UNIX perms say they should be granted access. Paul replies: > But wouldn't it also be a "surprise" when an NFS user finds
2012 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] another SCEV surprise
When compile the following case and look at the SCEV analysis, I notice that the first two loops don't have a LoopInvariantBackedgeTakenCount (surprising) and the last one does (not surprising, except in the context of the first two examples). *void p4(int *A, int *B, long int n) {* * for (char i = 0; i < n; i++) {* * A[i + 2] = i;* * *B++ = A[i];* * }* *}* * * *void p5(int *A, int
2007 Sep 12
2
Kickstart install surprise
I have to say that I was more that a bit surprised, if not to say dismayed when I booted a system with CentOS 5 installed to test a kickstart CD in interactive mode, took it to the custom partitioning screen, then rebooted without saving anything only to come up with a grub prompt, and the disk's partition table wiped. The ks.cfg file did say to wipe the disk when installing, but I would
2004 May 08
1
Surprise when indexing with a factor.
Hello, I had been thinking for years, without having ever checked (shame on me), that indexing a named vector by a factor 'f' produced the same results as indexing it by 'as.character(f)'. I was wrong, as the following example shows: (m <- c(a=1,b=2)) (f <- factor(c(1,2),labels=c('b','a'))) m[f] m[as.character(f)] m[as.numeric(f)] When the
2010 Jul 14
1
FYI: matrix surprise
Some time ago someone asked for things that make R difficult to master. Here I want to record one R behavior that took me off-guard yesterday. Moral of the story: vectorialize, but don't exaggerate. Hope it helps mario ### A very simple data frame tc <- textConnection( "prefix idx val A 1 11 A 2 22 B 1 33 B 2 44") s <- read.table(tc,
2009 Feb 05
3
seq(along= surprise
This surprised me: > reps <- 100 > sims <- list(length=reps) > sims $length [1] 100 > for(i in seq(along=sims))print(i) [1] 1 > This is R 2.8.1. Kjetil [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2012 Jun 20
1
[LLVMdev] another SCEV surprise
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:18:49 -0700 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Preston Briggs > <preston.briggs at gmail.com> wrote: > > When compile the following case and look at the SCEV analysis, I > > notice that the first two loops don't have a > > LoopInvariantBackedgeTakenCount (surprising) and the last one