similar to: Rails 3.0 API doesn't do word-wrap

Hey guys, This is the final list of the new maintainers of each plugin. We need two more things to do: First please the owners of the repos add the rest of the maintainers. Second I will add a note on each rails/plugin mentioning this repos updates. So from now on, if someone else is interested in helping/contributing please send a message to the appropriate repo owner. verification

Hello guys, I went into milestones page (https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/milestones) and found out that Rails 2.3.6 was due Jan 15, 2010. Does it mean all tickets in that milestone should be cleared first? If so, then I would pay attention to clear tickets in that bucket first. Thank you, Prem Sichanugrist (sikachu) -- You received this message because you are

Is there any reason why db:setup and db:reset don''t show any more on "rake -T db"? I guess any rake task that is defined only as a group of other tasks (without any ruby blocks attached) presents this problem. Also let me write this as a remember note to myself for when I have some time: the Rails Guides on Migrations should be updated to include instructions about db:load

(I posted this as a bug in GitHub (https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/7018), but then someone there told me I should post it here, so here it is.) If you set attr_accessible on some properties in an ActiveRecord-descended class, and then attr_protected on others - the class becomes ''default-open'' - if any properties are missed or added later, they will be accessible by

Hello all, I''m working on a Rails app and I have resources nested three deep - let''s call them user, project, and issues. The route helpers now look like user_project_issue_path(@user, @project, @issue). Would it make sense for Rails to guess the @user <https://github.com/user> and @project<https://github.com/project> relations from @issue

Hi I''ve contributed a patch which fixes an incorrect example in the documentation for auto_link in ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper. The example uses truncate in the old style of tuncate(text, length) which no longer works, so I''ve patched it to use the new tuncate(text, :length => n) style.

I found out today that Range#include? behaves differently on 1.9 than on 1.8 ( http://rhnh.net/2009/08/03/range-include-in-ruby-1-9 ) In order to deal with various edge cases, instead of just checking whether range.first <= value <= range.last, in ruby 1.9 include? steps through all the values in the range, checking for equality. This is of course a lot slower - in my case, checking a date

Yes, I know that Rails *2.3.x* is no longer fully supported (this is why I''m posting it to rails/issues). Still, I would like to post the topic so that everyone who experience the same problem could quickly google for it (no, afaik no solution for this yet). I''m trying to migrate a 1.5 years *2.3.x* app from Ruby version *1.8.7* to * 1.9.3-p0*. The strange problem I

I''ve looking into edge guides and I''ve notice the examples are using the old hash syntax. Some parts of rails code are changing to the new one. I want to update the examples in docrails to use the new syntax. Is there any reason not to do it? Regards. -- José Corcuera Z. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

In 2fe70c1 (last year), rails changed from a static list of assets.paths to automatically register any path under assets/*. (This was not reflected in Rails Guides so I pushed an update to docrails.) However, in my opinion, these automatic asset paths create confusion. The result is that the first-level directories under `(app|lib|vendor)/assets` get swallowed and if I put assets into a

Hello, I have a suggestion to improve the Rails Lighthouse overview page. At present the description is very large. You need to scroll to find the tickets and more importantly the list of pages. I think a shorter description along the lines of http://i48.tinypic.com/2z6a7lt.png would be much better. All the information at present in the description can be moved into pages, and they can be linked

Forms without explicit enctype are submitted as application/x-www-form- urlencoded. This is the default behaviour in Rails. However, this enctype does not allow transmission of binary data (files). Would it not make sense to specify the enctype multipart/form-data by default instead? i.e. all the form_for helpers would add this enctype to the form tag, unless overriden by the developer. This

hi folks, i wish to know if there''s a way to translate the rails guides to portuguese or others languages. I believe this way we can help community growing more each day. i`m really interested to help translate to portuguese and waiting for an answer if its possible and how. thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hi. I have few models - user, task, file class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :tasks end class Task < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user has_and_belongs_to_many :files end class File < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :tasks end I want to know files count for some user. is there some ''right'' way to do it without getting all tasks and looping

Hi everyone, I just created my first rails patch. It is a simple textile doc error requiring only a single word to be changed. https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/5779 I uploaded a .diff file. Not sure what to do now but lighthouse guide says I should ask on here for someone to take a look. Thank you for your time, fooledbyprimes Peoria, Illinois, USA --

Hey guys, is there a validation that essentially acts the opposite way of "validates_presence_of". That is, the attribute in question must be nil, or blank, non-existent. If not, what''s the best way to prevent a user from altering a web form attempting to submit data to a field that they should never have access to? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are

Looks like Rails 3 currently depends on RDoc 2.2.0 exactly, even though the latest version is 2.5.x. Why this specific version? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hello everyone, Because I don''t know communication channel to lifo/docrails, I ask about permissions for that repository. Recently I and friends started to translate rails guide for Korean version. Maybe, I expect to finish all current rails guides translating in 2 months, and then we''ll care these documents for recent version. Now, we provide a translation result site for

In Rails 3 routing, it seems we''re using the match() method to hook up arbitrary url patterns to rack endpoints (which I think is a great new routing feature). I''d like to suggest that we name it "connect", instead of "match": 1. It maintains continuity with previous versions of rails 2. It''s more descriptive of the intention of a route: to connect

Hey All, Two questions. Firstly, what is the difference between create and create! I see that create is document in the api http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html#M002269 What is the difference between the two of these functions and where is the create! function defined. Also, What are the differences between these two calls? a) SomeModel.create!{ :property_a =>