similar to: In development mode not all types are included in the query related to type

Hi - quick question: when will "TODO" comment/rake support come out? Tks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Yesterday I answered a question regarding polymorphic URL helpers on Core ML and noticed that the module has no documentation. I''ve documented it and rewritten unit tests using Mocha. I also optimized some of the code slightly (nothing major, though). The patch also includes two fixes by Geoff Buesing, who has done awesome work in this area in the past.

Just trying to implement a simple helper over the past few days had me really confused. messages = '''' messages << content_tag(:p, ''dave'') #=> &lt;p&gt;dave&lt;\p%;gt; Eventually I realised the original empty string was not html_safe message = ''''.html_safe message << content_tag(:p, ''dave'') #=>

A Rails 2.3.9 app with Active Record or Memcache session store will never send the session ID cookie to a client if the client doesn''t send any HTTP cookies in its requests. Rails integration tests didn''t catch this because they always send the HTTP_COOKIE header, even if it''s empty. This is a huge bug, as it can break keeping sessions on sites which don''t set

According to "Ruby On Rails", the layout call is suppose to be inherited: (page 508) "Subclasses of a controller will use the parent''s layout unless they override it using the layout directive" I have a case where this is not working. I have not spent time to concoct a stand alone test. I wanted to verify that David''s book is correct first. Can someone

Hi, http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8453 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8371 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3227 I came across the above by accident. While I am subscribed to the so called rails security list where supposed announcement of security issues were to be posted, neither of the above problem made the list. While I use rails a lot and like it, the above

I was just wondering what about a report that I made almost 2 months ago: Active Record observers broken<https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/4087-activerecord-observers-cant-be-used-for-before-callbacks> I think it''s a pretty big bug. In Rails 3, creating an observer with a "before_save" callback (for instance) will result in all observed models being

Hi, I just put in a patch that allows you to DRY up this: <%= link_to @company.name, @company %> to this: <%= link_to :name, @company %> The symbol indicates the method to be called on the object passed in the link_to options. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8789 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

class Brake scope :good, where(:quality => ''good'') end Brake.all.select &:nil? #=> works fine Brake.good.select &:nil? #=> FAILS Last statement fails because Brake.good.select is returning ActiveRecord::Relation and not an array. I have posted a detailed discussion on ticket #4589 .

Hello all, You can easily reproduce with Rails 2.0.2 gems: $ irb >> require ''rubygems'' >> require ''active_support'' >> require ''action_pack'' >> require ''action_view'' *BOOM* You should get an error: MissingSourceFile: no such file to load -- html/document This is because

Hello, I wish to route a sinatra application in my Rails 3 app. As said by Yehuda, it should be possible. http://yehudakatz.com/2009/12/26/the-rails-3-router-rack-it-up/ However I see the route isn''t recognized and I get ActionController::RoutingError problems. It works well with simple rack apps however (the test in actionpack with a lambda passes well). I''ve written a test

As it currently stands, ActiveRecord has alot of private and protected methods in the Base class. >> ActiveRecord::Base.methods.size => 427 >> ActiveRecord::Base.protected_methods.size => 32 >> ActiveRecord::Base.private_methods.size => 193 I really loved the suggestion by Courtenay in Refactoring AR::Base.find (http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/

I search an plugin or gem, but don''t find nothing satisfactory. I believe to be stranger a technology that nails the DRY, have that create you vary equal tables, instead of using inheritance. Exists an soluction for this? I want a solution similar to this: create_table :people |t| do t.column :name t.column :address end create_table :customer |t| do t.column :person_id

I''m rebuilding a library/academic system (including public web) using excellent Rails. I''m trying to make the most out of ActiveRecord, but rethinking the database schema spawned some potential issues that may cause problems down the road, so I want thoughts on this from more experienced community. The thing is, all entities in the system have a fixed set of metadata. At

In Rails 3.0 (both RC and edge), any constant that''s defined while loading a file in development mode will get unloaded on each request, regardless of whether it comes from an autoload path in the application or from external code such as a gem. Example file (tested on a fresh edge app): # kittens.rb require ''nibbler/json'' # "nibbler" is a gem specified

Hello, I posted this on the rails talk group but received no response. Perhaps someone on this list could weigh in on whether this is expected/desired behavior or a bug that I should file and develop failing tests for (I doubt I have the active record method_missing fu to actually patch it). Test Scenario: I would like to find or initialize a new user and base the find on the users email

Hi, As per another member''s suggestion, I''m trying to user STI. So I have this table: CREATE TABLE `settings` ( `id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `type` char(40) NOT NULL default ''General'', `name` char(40) NOT NULL default '''', `value` char(128) NOT NULL default '''', `updated_on` datetime default NULL,

I love form_for, but I really hate <% form_for :person, @person, :url => {...} do |f| %> ... <%= render :partial => ''form'', :locals => {''f'' => f} ... <% end %> I''ve been thinking of instead allowing <% form_for :person, @person, :url => {...} do |f| %> ... <%= f.partial ''form''

I''ve just reinstalled linux (9.10) and am trying to match my gem environment to our server''s. I''m having a problem with will_paginate. On the server, under gem list, i have "mislav-will_paginate (2.3.6)". So, i''m trying to install that locally. Following the instructions on the will_paginate page, http://wiki.github.com/mislav/will_paginate,

I''m pretty new to Rails and now, in order to fully learn RoR, I''m trying to replicate a project developed in Java using Hibernate+Tapestry. Tapestry is based on components and you can really use objects mappings in views like: Example from the contact edit (view). <input jwcid="@TextField" value="ognl:contact.name" /> <input