similar to: [CruiseControl] RubyOnRails build 8688 failed

The build failed. CHANGES ------- Revision 8671 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-19 03:45:24 Support aggregations in finder conditions. Closes #10572. M /trunk/activerecord/test/cases/finder_test.rb M /trunk/activerecord/CHANGELOG M /trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/aggregations.rb M /trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb TEST FAILURES AND ERRORS -----------------------

The build failed. CHANGES ------- Revision 8896 committed by bitsweat on 2008-02-19 02:56:05 Don''t assume all records from nested include are of same class. Closes #11154 [acechase] M /trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb A /trunk/activerecord/test/cases/associations/eager_load_nested_include_test.rb TEST FAILURES AND ERRORS ----------------------- Name:

Greetings, I''m trying to emulate the "Redirect" function of some email clients but am not having much success. I am sending messages with ActionMailer templates just fine so I''m pretty sure my environment is set up correctly and that my mail server is accepting the messages to relay. I am reading messages out of an mbox file and parsing them into RMail objects with

The build failed. CHANGES ------- New revision 9153 detected Revision 9153 committed by gbuesing on 2008-03-30 23:49:52 TZInfo: Removing unneeded TimezoneProxy class M /trunk/activesupport/CHANGELOG D /trunk/activesupport/lib/active_support/vendor/tzinfo-0.3.8/tzinfo/timezone_proxy.rb M /trunk/activesupport/Rakefile M /trunk/activesupport/lib/active_support/vendor/tzinfo-0.3.8/tzinfo.rb

The build failed. CHANGES ------- Revision 8649 committed by gbuesing on 2008-01-16 20:07:10 Introducing DateTime #utc, #utc? and #utc_offset, for duck-typing compatibility with Time. Closes #10002 M /trunk/activesupport/CHANGELOG M /trunk/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/date_time/calculations.rb M /trunk/activesupport/test/core_ext/date_time_ext_test.rb TEST FAILURES AND

> On 10 May 2017, at 14.57, KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > > I could use an example of how to use curl to save a new message to a user?s INBOX using the Doveadm HTTP API. > Here you go: doveadm mailbox save parameters: { "command": "save", "parameters": [ { "name": "allUsers",

> On May 10, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > >> On 10 May 2017, at 14.57, KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: >> >> I could use an example of how to use curl to save a new message to a user?s INBOX using the Doveadm HTTP API. >> > > Here you go: > > doveadm mailbox save > > parameters:

hello all, i am new to RoR programming and am struck with the functional test whole checking for uniqeness of carriers. If it is not unique,the the bin shudn''t be created.Can someone help me in correcting my code. def test_create_failure_cycle_unique begin num_bins = Bin.count post :create, {:bin => { :carrier => carriers(:A), :cycle => cycles(:one), :name =>

Hello there, I working on my tests but I getting this strange errror: I can see on the database that the object was created but I still got an failure on my test. this is my test code: test "should create artist" do assert_difference(''Artist.count'', difference = 1) do post :create, :artist => { } end assert_redirected_to

I have the following STI table: def self.up create_table :distributions do |t| t.string :type t.integer :simulation_id t.string :dist_name t.string :desc, :default=> ''fixed'' t.float :param1, :default => 5.0 t.float :param2, :param3 t.timestamps #fields for RscDist t.integer :resource_id #fields for LoadDist

Hi, I'm trying to get the so-called "single instance store" (I think cyrus has got the name for the first time) with dovecot --version = 2.0.19 binary package installed from ubuntu 12.04 lts official repo. I have checked that "maildir_copy_with_hardlinks" is enabled ("dovecot -a|grep hard" shows "yes") then I have installed and enabled the lmtp

Hello I am trying to transform my web app into a 2.2 ready app, in my config/environment.rb I wrote Rails::Initializer.run do |config| ..... # disabling the surrounding div if validation error ActionView::Base.field_error_proc = Proc.new do |html_tag, instance| if html_tag.include?("class=") html_tag.sub(%r{(class=["''])}, ''\1invalid '')

> On May 10, 2017, at 5:16 PM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > >> On 10 May 2017, at 16.26, KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: >>> >>> # curl -v -X POST -u doveadm:hellodoveadm -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d

> On 10 May 2017, at 16.26, KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: >> >> # curl -v -X POST -u doveadm:hellodoveadm -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '[["save",{"user":"samik","mailbox":"INBOX/myfoldertoo","file":"From: Joulu Pukki <joulu.pukki at korvatunturi.fi>\nSubject: plaa\n\nmail

Hey everybody, I am trying to test a small application with a simple testing, but I get the following errors while using Aptana 2.0.5 with Ruby 1.9.1 and Rails 2.3.8(I know why I get the first one, but I''m not sure about the ActiveSupport errors): Exception: undefined method `screen_name'' for nil:NilClass

(I''ve had this patch lying around for a couple of weeks, waiting for Trac to come back up. noradio''s already had a look at it on IRC. What''s the best way to submit patches while Trac is down?) with_scope doesn''t support :order in the presence of :include. For example: {{{ # We''re testing the interaction between :order, :include, and

I am having a problem using the test database in Rails 3. It apparently has kept track of aspects of the database that I deleted completely from my migrations at some point. I don''t always use the ''down'' part of a migration and sometimes just recreate the whole database. I did rake db:migrate:reset and rake db:test:prepare, but when I run my test it is trying to access

I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to

I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to

Hi, I run the "Unit testing", Then The "Actionview::Testcase" is failed. i.e i am getting the error as below, 1) Error: test_tablename(ActionView::TestCase): TypeError: wrong argument type Class (expected Module) /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/helpers.rb:76:in `include''