similar to: Regexp#quote in request.rb

I have this in my controllers/application.rb: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base ... def datebalk! # set regexp for datebalks generated attributes c = /.*__dteblk/ # Remove datebalks generated attributes from params hash delete_if { |k, v| c =~ k.to_s } end ... end When I call this from client_controllers.rb in this fashion: # need this to strip

Hello, I noticed (due to a recent post by Martin Honnen to clp) that Element.Class uses wrong regexps for its operations. E.g., Element.Class.has() will find "classA" in "classA-foobar" I also changed the interface of .has() to the more general one used in .has_any() --- util.js.old 2005-08-21 19:18:40.000000000 +0200 +++ util.js 2005-08-21 19:31:42.000000000 +0200 @@

Environment: CentOS 4.2 (RHES4 clone) Ruby 1.8.4 Rails 1.0 I am having a small difficulty with case sensitive matching in some ruby code: f_nam_re = Regexp.new(f_nam_re_s,"x") produces these test results: The passed regexp: ^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$ The regexp used is: /^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$/i $= is false qpcccmr1 matches QPCCCMR1 matches QPCCMMR1 does not match qpCCCMR1 matches QPCCCMRC

Hi all, In response to Rodrigo Rosas''s message about mb_chars.upcase not giving the expected result on 1.9, I''ve done some work in a fork to make String#mb_chars always return an instance of a proxy class, both with Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9. The end result of the patch is (hopefully) to make Rails'' multibyte functionality behave the same way in 1.8.7 and 1.9.x.

Just a quick question or maybe a suggestion, is there a gem/plugin that will convert ruby regexp to javascript regexp? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi, I''ve been using the rassmalog static blogging engine and have encountered a stack overflow inside the redcloth regexp matcher. I don''t seem to suffer this error on my Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn) box (with Ruby 1.8.4??), but I do get it on my Gentoo system. Running the following line will generate it (I''ve attached the YAML/redcloth file to this message). $ ruby -ryaml

And it won't if 'http://webmail.domain' is the actual text, the ^ says "at the start of the line" (in other words, 'webmail\.' must start in character position 1). Choices: Remove the caret and accept the consequence that all references to "webmail\." will be changed or determine how to re-write (pardon the pun) the rule to narrow the scope to (such as)

I notice in recent commits that a number of these have been added: /\[(\d+)\]/.freeze I thought that Regexps are immutable. Furthermore, Regexp literals don''t generate a new object each time they are encountered: irb(main):001:0> 3.times { puts /\d+/.object_id } -605707646 -605707646 -605707646 => 3 irb(main):002:0> Unlike strings: irb(main):002:0> 3.times { puts

Hmmm, maybe I spoke too soon, why the second test didn't match isn't obvious to me (unless Apache regex is different from grep). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leroy Tennison" <leroy at datavoiceint.com> To: "centos" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 10:15:54 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] help with RewriteRule regexp And it won't

Anyone succeeded in using regexp replacements in ENUM, like "!\\+421257296(.*)$!sip:2\\1@stuba.sk!" I can't get it to work in ASterisk. I've added '\\1' and Debug echos "1" I've added '\\\\1' and debug echoes "\1", but regexp fails to work. The example above is from the nic.at presentation, I can't get it to work. /Olle

My regexp skills are somewhere infinitesimally close to zero. I have never really 'gotten' them. That said, I have spent a couple hours already search for help to write a rewriterule that works on a string in the URL. In particular I want success if either of the following were provided: webmail.domain (e.g. webmail.foo.com) server/webmail (e.g. www.foo.com/webmail) And I have not

Seems I left off one point in this message. This is to refine these rules in my Apache server. RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !^443$ RewriteRule ^.*$ https://%{SERVER_NAME}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R] I only want the rewrite if the URL includes webmail as I indicate below. I have found that now the RewriteCond is 'recommended' to be changed to: RewriteCond

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 325874 logcheck-database Bug#325874: nagios-common: logcheck regexp issue Bug reassigned from package `nagios-common' to `logcheck-database'. > tags 325874 + patch Bug#325874: nagios-common: logcheck regexp issue Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:52:44 +0100 > From: Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> > To: <Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at> > Cc: <r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch> > Subject: Re: [Rd] Question about Unix file paths > > > > >>>>> " Kurt" == Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at> > >>>>> on Wed, 26

Hello! this is a short one: in a gotoif-statement i would like to match a variable to a number, where the number could have digits from 2-6. asterisk only seems to be capable to match such a digit-range when used in the extension, but not in a regexp, at least the following query doesn't work: exten => _X.,1,GotoIf($[${EXTEN} : 234[2-6]]?jump:) obviously asterisk has a problem with

Hello, I have a stupid regexp question. I have a large data frame of strings. I would like to convert all occurences of : "W.m^{-2}" to "W/m2" I make the following test : gsub(glob2rx("W.m^{-2}"), "W/m2", "W.m^{-2}") but it does not seem to work. I don't know how to do it otherwise as I could never learn how to deal with the special

Can somebody tell me why the following RegExp doesn''t work for date validation in Rails... It validates fine in RadRails -- using REgExp panel. Intended format: (mm/dd/yyyy): %r{^(0[1-9]|1[012])(-|/)(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])(-|/)(19|20)([0-9][0-9])$} If i try the following, it works in Rails: %r{(0[1-9]|1[012])(-|/)(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])} When I add the last piece, it

Hi, I''m looking through the Merb::Routing code and I''ve found a regexp that I can''t figure out how it works. Merb::Router::SECTION_REGEXP #=> /(?::([a-z*_]+))/ It takes a route definition string, like "/products/:model/:id" and extracts the "model" string on the first pass, and later the "id" string. Can anyone shed some light on

I found out today that Range#include? behaves differently on 1.9 than on 1.8 ( http://rhnh.net/2009/08/03/range-include-in-ruby-1-9 ) In order to deal with various edge cases, instead of just checking whether range.first <= value <= range.last, in ruby 1.9 include? steps through all the values in the range, checking for equality. This is of course a lot slower - in my case, checking a date

Sorry, meant to post this in the rails forum. Anyways, how would I write a rescue method to recover from a failed regexp parsing with error "regexp not matched" -Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post