similar to: has_many :through with a has_one source

Hello. I am not certain even how to search the archives for this particular question, so if there is an obvious answer, please smack me with a large halibut and send me to the URLs. I have been experimenting with fitting curves by using both maximum likelihood and maximum spacing estimation techniques. Originally, I have been writing distribution-specific functions in 'R' which work

Hi , I am new to R. I am trying to run a simple R script as shown below: aov.R ------ data1<-c(49,47,46,47,48,47,41,46,43,47,46,45,48,46,47,45,49,44,44,45,42,45,45,40 ,49,46,47,45,49,45,41,43,44,46,45,40,45,43,44,45,48,46,40,45,40,45,47,40) matrix(data1, ncol= 4, dimnames = list(paste("subj", 1:12), c("Shape1.Color1", "Shape2.Color1", "Shape1.Color2",

Hi, Interpretation problem ! so what i did is by using the: >fit1 <- fitdist(vectNorm,"beta") Warning messages: 1: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 2: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 3: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 4: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 5: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 6: In

Dear R users, first I take this opportunity to greet all the R community for your continuous efforts. I wrote a function to calculate the pdf and cdf of a custom distribution (mixed gamma model). The function is the following: pmixedgamma3 <- function(y, shape1, rate1, shape2, rate2, prev) { density.function<-function(x) { shape1=shape1 rate1=rate1 shape2=shape2

Hi, sorry for repeating the question but this is kind of important to me and i don't know whom should i ask. So as noted before when I do a parameter fit to the beta distr i get: fitdist(vectNorm,"beta"); Fitting of the distribution ' beta ' by maximum likelihood Parameters: estimate Std. Error shape1 2.148779 0.1458042 shape2 810.067515 61.8608126 Warning

>>>>> Ben Bolker >>>>> on Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:09:16 -0400 writes: > I've discovered an infelicity (I guess) in qbeta(): it's not a bug, > since there's a clear warning about lack of convergence of the numerical > algorithm ("full precision may not have been achieved"). I can work > around this, but I'm

Buenos dias! Os escribo para ver si me podeis ayudar con un asunto en el que me he quedado un poco encallado. Lo que tengo que hacer es sacar los percentiles (0.001, 0.005, 0.95 y 0.999) de varias distribuciones beta, concretamente 418. Cada distribucion esta definida por los parametros "shape1" y "shape2". Por lo tanto tengo una base de datos de 418 filas y en cada una de

Hallo, I need your help. I fitted my distribution of data with beta-prime, I need now to plot the Cumulative distribution. For other distribution like Gamma is easy: x <- seq (0, 100, 0.5) plot(x,pgamma(x, shape, scale), type= "l", col="red") but what about beta-prime? In R it exists only pbeta which is intended only for the beta distribution (not beta-prime) This is

Dear Charles, Please, when you have questions about fitdistrplus, contact directly the authors of the package and not R-help. When fitting non ? standard ? distributions with fitdistrplus, you should define by yourself the density and the cumulative distribution functions, or load a package which define them. See FAQ for a general example :

Hi, I noticed this problem on my home desktop running FC4 and again on my laptop running FC5. Both have previously compiled and passed make check-all on 2.3.1 svn revisions from 10 days ago or so. On both these machines, make check-all is consistently failing (4 out of 4 attempts on the FC 4 desktop and 3 out of 3 on the FC 5 laptop) in the p-r-random-tests tests. This is with both default

I've discovered an infelicity (I guess) in qbeta(): it's not a bug, since there's a clear warning about lack of convergence of the numerical algorithm ("full precision may not have been achieved"). I can work around this, but I'm curious why it happens and whether there's a better workaround -- it doesn't seem to be in a particularly extreme corner of parameter

Dear all, I am trying to use the logistic regression with MCMClogit (package: MCMCpack/Coda) and I want to put a beta prior on the parameters, but it's giving me error message (please see output below) no matter what shape 1 or 2 I use. It works perfect with the cauchy or normal priors. Do you know if there is a catch there somewhere? Thanks logpriorfun <- function(beta,shape1,shape2){

Given that a number of us are housebound, it might be a good time to try to improve the approximation. It's not an area where I have much expertise, but in looking at the qbeta.c code I see a lot of root-finding, where I do have some background. However, I'm very reluctant to work alone on this, and will ask interested others to email off-list. If there are others, I'll report back.

I have the following problem: I have a vector x of data (0<x<=1 ) with a U-shaped histogram and try to fit a beta distribution using fitdistr. In fact, hist(rbeta(100,0.1,0.1)) looks a lot like my data. The equivalent to the example in the manual sometimes work: > a <- rbeta(100,0.1,0.1) > fitdistr(x=a, "beta", start=list(shape1=0.1,shape2=0.1))1) > shape1

Dear all, we received a bug report for betareg, that in some cases the optim call in betareg.fit would hang the R session and the command cannot be interrupted by Ctrl-C? We narrowed down the problem to the dbeta function which is used for the log likelihood evaluation in betareg.fit. Particularly, the following command hangs the R session to a 100% CPU usage in all systems we tried it (OS X

Hi folks, I have a question about how to efficiently produce random numbers from Beta and Binomial distributions. For Beta distribution, suppose we have two shape vectors shape1 and shape2. I hope to generate a 10000 x 2 matrix X whose i th rwo is a sample from reta(2,shape1[i]mshape2[i]). Of course this can be done via loops: for(i in 1:10000) { X[i,]=rbeta(2,shape1[i],shape2[i]) } However,

Dear R-help, We've been trying, so far unsuccessfully, to compile R as 64-bit under AIX 5.1. Following the recent post by Dr. Christoph Pospiech, I started with R-1.8.1 and manually edited the configure script according to the .diff file. Part of the diff has: *************** *** 24446,24452 **** int main () { struct tm *tm; ! time_t ct; ctime(&ct); ct = ct - (ct

This is also strange: qbeta <- function (p, shape1, shape2, ncp = 0, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE) { if (missing(ncp)) .Call(C_qbeta, p, shape1, shape2, lower.tail, log.p) else .Call(C_qnbeta, p, shape1, shape2, ncp, lower.tail, log.p) } Since the default value is 0 for non-centrality, it seems like the logic above is wrong. When ncp=0, C_qnbeta would be called

Dear R-Developers, I just started learning how to use Rcpp. Earlier while using it, I encountered an error as shown below: file74d8254b96d4.cpp: In function ‘Rcpp::NumericVector foo(Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::Function, Rcpp::Function)’: file74d8254b96d4.cpp:10: error: invalid operands of types ‘SEXPREC*’ and ‘R_len_t’ to binary ‘operator/’ make: ***

Hi R users: I'm trying to make a function where two of the parameters are functions, but I don't know how to put each set of parameters for each function. What am I missing? I try this code: f2<-function(n=2,nsim=100,fun1=rnorm,par1=list(),fun2=rnorm,par2=list()){ force(fun1) force(fun2) force(n) p1<-unlist(par1) p2<-unlist(par2) force(p1) force(p2)