similar to: Allowing validates_acceptance_of to store value on the database column

Hi Why does a failed "validates_acceptance_of" create a hidden input in the view? cheers, jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this

On my registration form I have a checkbox for a waiver. In the model I have the statement: validates_acceptance_of :waiver, :on => :create, :message => "must be accepted" In the view: <%= check_box_tag("waiver") %> <%= error_message_on "user", "waiver", "Waiver "%> For some reason validate is accepting everything when the

I''m having some difficulties getting validates_acceptance_of to work. No matter whether I tick the checkbox for my terms and conditions on my form, it will not submit it and shows my error message. in my model i have: validates_acceptance_of :agree_to_terms, :message => "" in my view i have: <%= error_message_on :user, :agree_to_terms, "You must agree to the

Hi, I''ve a question concerning validates_acceptance_of method. Documentation says that the validated attribute is a virtual one, without a field in db. But when I add such an attribute to my form (say check_box(:xyz, :agreement)), it''s passed in params[:xyz][:agreement], but not assigned when calling Xyz.new(params[:xyz]), probably because corresponding field

I had to add a check box indicating that a user accepted certain terms to a page. So, I put in a ''validates_acceptance_of :terms'' line into the appropriate model and added a checkbox to my view. Everything works as expected in my web browser. However, my functional tests still pass and I didn''t add or change anything to them. I was expecting to have to add another

Hello, I am having trouble displaying a check box which must be checked but hasn''t been. I would like it to be highlighted as in a scaffolded view but the hidden check box field which is generated by the check_box helper is also highlighted, and the text next to it loses its styling. My code follows. Should I get cleverer with the CSS or write my own check_box helper which

Hello, CentOS team and everyone who cares about CentOS, Huawei release an Euler OS, which is an distribution based on CentOS. http://developer.huawei.com/ict/en/site-euleros/euleros-introduction According to CentOS's statement, CentOS is distributed under the GPLv2 License. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.4.1708/os/x86_64/EULA The GPL license requires the modified version to be

On 2023-07-25 04:25, Phil Perry wrote: > Nonsense. For years Red Hat freely published the complete RHEL SRPMs > to their public ftp server. No, they didn't.? Take a look at the planning guide diagrams, here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata A RHEL major release isn't a single lifecycle.? It's a sequence of minor releases, many of which have 4 year

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:31:20 +0800 Genghuang Wang <wangtianjiao.wang959 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Peter, thanks for your reply > > 1. Huawei DOES change the distribution EULA, if type in the following > command: vi /usr/share/eula/eula.en_US > you can see it changed to "HUAWEI EulerOS-2.0" > which is a copyright one, let alone original GPL license. That

Hello, Peter, thanks for your reply 1. Huawei DOES change the distribution EULA, if type in the following command: vi /usr/share/eula/eula.en_US you can see it changed to "HUAWEI EulerOS-2.0" which is a copyright one, let alone original GPL license. According to CentOS Linux EULA The Distribution is released as GPLv2. Individual packages in the distribution come with their own

I''ve copied the contents of the Oracle Linux 6.3 installation media to an directory that''s exported via NFS: san2:~ # ls -1 /srv/md128/repositories/oracle/6.3/os/x86_64/ EFI EULA eula.en_US eula.py GPL HighAvailability images isolinux LoadBalancer media.repo Packages README-en README-en.html RELEASE-NOTES-en RELEASE-NOTES-en.html RELEASE-NOTES-x86_64-en

All.... I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar. At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error. One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails. ./eula: cannot execute

Hi, Looking at the .NET redistributable EULA, there are things in it like this: NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A VALID EULA FOR ANY "OS PRODUCT" (MICROSOFT WINDOWS 98, [etc etc]), YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO INSTALL, COPY OR OTHERWISE USE THE OS COMPONENTS AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS UNDER THIS SUPPLEMENTAL EULA. It seems to me that this means that you can't install the .NET redistributable if

I was trying to stay out of this thread, but the reply was complete and utter nonsense... On 25/07/2023 01:24, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-24 13:47, frank saporito wrote: >> Let me know if you disagree with any of these statements: >> >> 1. Red Hat is no longer posting source code to git.centos.org. > > > Correct.? Red Hat used to publish a de-branded

Hi all, I''m running XP and 2003 Server fine as HVM guests (under a 32 bit non-pae Xen 3.0.3 self-compiled). I''ve read that Vista can *not* be /installed/ under Xen for it checks for ACPI support and install fails if it isn''t present. What if I do the install first from, say, plain Qemu (I''re reused qemu images from Xen) or VMWare (I''ve converted

Hello felllow wine users, Using some of the dll packages from my vista machine, I managed to complete the installation of framemaker 8. When the application is run for the first time, it asks for the EULA to be accepted. The first time this happened, wine asked to install 'Gecko' for html to display (im assuming the EULA is a form based in html). The buttons to accept, reject and cancel

I know these topics exist, I have tried a multitude of them, but no show. My eve stops each time at the eula. screen is black after the splash screen until the eula tries to visit my screen. (for those not in the know, I just need to click yes to actually play the game) when running it through terminal, I get the following (... equals a lot of the line above it) bram at

Hello, I'm not clear withs groups mapping between NT and Unix Groups. Configuration : PDC : NT4 box (PDC won't migrate to samba) Samba 2.2.8a (UCLA binary) / AIX 5.2 Security = domain. Some NT users and groups have more than 8 cars. For the users, we have the "usermap" file, seems to work fine. What is the solution for the groups ? On the other hand, is the NT group membership

In the process of updating my copy of the CentOS 7 (1503) -01 install media, I notice that it's ~70MB larger than the image that it's replacing: $ rsync mirrors.kernel.org::centos/7.1.1503/isos/x86_64/*DVD*.iso -rw-r--r-- 4310695936 2015/03/31 17:05:50 CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503-01.iso -rw-r--r-- 4236247040 2015/03/28 12:15:26 CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso But when I compare sizes using

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:02:59 +0800 Genghuang Wang <wangtianjiao.wang959 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, CentOS team and everyone who cares about CentOS, > > Huawei release an Euler OS, which is an distribution based on CentOS. > http://developer.huawei.com/ict/en/site-euleros/euleros-introduction > > According to CentOS's statement, CentOS is distributed under the >