Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Using mixins versus delegation"
2005 Nov 21
1
[OT] DNSguruz pl help: whois structure, delegation & handling delegation with Tinydns.
List:
Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step
instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond.
Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given
in ./configure for complete idiots ;-)
1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has
put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems
incomplete, as it
2015 Aug 18
2
NFSv4 delegation
Hi,
Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration?
If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling
2015 Aug 18
2
NFSv4 delegation
On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on
> your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of
> write operations.
>
> If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR,
> this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot
>
2015 Jul 09
3
NFSv4 delegation
just a quick update:
no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes)
instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of
days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible
sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-(
-brd
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto:
> >Alessio
2007 Oct 05
3
Rails 1.2.4: Maintenance release
The last stop before Rails 2.0 has gone live. Get your Rails 1.2.4
maintenance goodness and have those deprecations taken care of before
you head for two-oh-oh land. Read more at
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2007/10/5/rails-1-2-4-maintenance-release.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
2019 Jul 25
1
Trusted for delegation?
I ran samba-tool delegation show administrator and got this:
athena:~# samba-tool delegation show administrator
Account-DN: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=edm-inc,DC=com
UF_TRUSTED_FOR_DELEGATION: False
UF_TRUSTED_TO_AUTHENTICATE_FOR_DELEGATION: False
Is this legit?? Shouldn't the domain administrator be true for these?
--
Bob Wooldridge
EDM Incorporated
2015 Jun 12
2
NFSv4 delegation
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
[...]
> Have you already try to run NFSv4?
it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues
up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel)
> When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems
> and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if
> was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian
2016 Sep 02
4
AD, add computers delegation
Hi,
Following that link https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/932455 we
created a delegation to permit some group to add computers into AD.
That works except if some computer with same name was already added (even
if this computer with same name was previously cleanly removed from AD).
Anyone who has idea what we missed?
Cheers,
M.
2011 May 23
1
delegation of admin rights
Hello,
We're a rather largish university (largest in Israel), with some
60-70k users, using Dovecot 1.2.14
(we're cautious about moving to 2.0.x for now).
We need to provide admin rights to faculty computer/IT staff, so they
can have access to the mailboxes
of their respective users. We use LDAP as an
authentication/authorization backend.
Currently, dovecot has a "master
2015 Nov 03
2
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 03/11/15 08:10, Davor Vusir wrote:
>
>
> No, Davor. That won't work. The delegated user account is not member
> of 'AD\Domain Admins' which is member of the group
> 'SERVER\Administrators'. You have to use the username map to be able
> to add the first AD-group or account to 'SERVER\Administrators'.
>
No, Davor, you don't have to use a
2007 May 22
7
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.create_database defaults to latin1
If you use ActiveRecord::Base.connection.create_database you''ll notice
that by default the created db will use latin1 encoding. I created a
plugin to handle different charset and collations (on top of helping
you with other boring DB tasks).
You can check out the early version of the plugin
svn checkout svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/raketasks/db_tasks
(I really need to move my projects out
2008 Mar 09
1
Event delegation library that interacts with Scriptaculous
Hey Guys,
Wanted to let you know about an event delegation library that
interacts with Scriptaculous that we''ve used to make interactive UI
elements with really clean code. We used it with Scriptaculous to
create the scrolling widgets on the homepage of http://javascriptmvc.com/.
It''s called Controller and it is an event delegation library that
helps logically organize your
2015 Oct 29
2
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31:
> I'm thick :D
> I don't really understand more :(
>
No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more
enlightning:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and
http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html.
> Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also
2015 Jun 11
2
NFSv4 delegation
hi all,
i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS
backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS
server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of
NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of
dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access
a specific mailbox at a
2015 Oct 30
2
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote:
>>
>>
>> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31:
>>> I'm thick :D
>>> I don't really understand more :(
>>>
>>
>> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more
>> enlightning:
>>
2016 Sep 02
1
AD, add computers delegation
Thank you Louis, I'll have a try!
And yep, you're so right about using groups rather than users, so that's
what we did ;)
I'll try to test that today and come back to tell yall how it went. Have
nice week-end if I can't come back today : )
M.
2016-09-02 16:09 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
>:
> Hai Mathias.
>
> I think you
2013 Aug 15
1
Samba4 & Delegation
Hi,
It has been a while that I did not come back to this topic, however I think I found a work-around for my initial problem.
For information, what I was trying to do was:
- Create an OU for a group of applications
- Delegate control of this OU to a normal user (not helpdesk or domain admin) to be able to create groups and assign domain users to them
The problem was, whenever I
2023 Jan 22
2
Delegation of control failure for any built-in Security Principals
Hi team.
I am trying to allocate some rights to users in Active Directory, by using the "Delegation of Control Wizard" from ADUC.
The steps I'm following were executed under the domain administrator user and are the following:
1. open ADUC and right click the top level OU (Ex. domain.org)
2. from the pop-up menu, select ?Delegate Control??
3. click next in the first page of the
2015 Oct 29
3
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 2015-10-29 12:23, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 29/10/15 09:47, Davor Vusir wrote:
>> On 2015-10-29 09:52, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 29/10/15 08:34, Davor Vusir wrote:
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>
>>>> We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain
>>>> administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use
2015 Nov 04
1
Local Administrators (group) and delegation in AD
On 04/11/15 15:09, mathias dufresne wrote:
> As Davor wants to delegate I expect he does not want to give
> Administrator password to these persons ;) And using a keytab to
> avoid giving them the password is not a solution: they would be able
> to perform everything they want on samba, which is certainly far from
> the delegation he initially thought...
Ah, what I posted was