similar to: has_one_or_many

I administer a remote server and want to apply some of the security patches. (I assume this is the best way to go since I can't go into single-user mode to use CVsup). I have a couple of questions. First, I have installed one of the pgp ports to verify the patches. When I run it, I get this message: > File 'buffer46.patch.asc' has signature, but with no text. > Text is

I have a select issue with my members, my database structure is below User has many shops Shop belongs to a membership Shop has many items For front page I want to show items where membership of the shop has ad_enabled and this is what I have in mind but it returns with "Association named ''membership'' was not found; perhaps you misspelled it?" I tried to add to Item

Hello, I''ve got this problem. There is an linux server with 2.4.24 kernel and pinging from him to internet (or from lan) ping randomly jumps up: 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=387 ttl=59 time=30.0 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=388 ttl=59 time=32.6 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=389 ttl=59 time=34.9 ms

Hi, I''ve been breaking my head over this thing with no success. Here is my table layout - class User < AR has_many :memberships has_many :groups, :through => :memberships ... class Group < AR has_many :memberships has_many :users, :through => :memberships ... class Membership < AR belongs_to :user, :class_name => "User", :foreign_key =>

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am getting a permission denied when trying to ls as a domain user a > samba mount with windows ACLs (sigh I thought I had this figured > out). I tried to include self descriptive server names and include > them in the info below (fs1: file server, nc: addc, u2gui: ubuntu >

stimpak wrote: > exactly the file hierarchy i was thinking about! > > put the core files somewhere reachable for all users,but instead of making syslinks, wouldnt be best or possible to create separate *.reg for each account, so you wont risk a registry corruption? > > still that script doesnt make WINE multiuser (as in many users as the same time - so dont try that if you're

On 1/26/24 09:34, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 1/26/24 02:35, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> The share mounts and I am a member of the correct groups >>> CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ cat /etc/fstab //fs.carlson.lab/test >>> /mnt/test

Hi samba --version Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 smb.conf: [users] path = /home/users read only = No Working on the DC which is also the fileserver user steve2 can write to his folder at /home/users/steve2 But if we now mount the share: sudo mount -t cifs //doloresdc/users /mnt -osec=krb5,multiuser he can't write to the mounted share at /mnt/users/steve2 He gets 'Permission denied'.

Hello, I understand the function and reason of limits.conf, and I have some limited experience configuring values for (essentially single-user) Oracle systems. How do I understand correctly what my limits should be for multiuser system system, are there best practice guidance? Are there some typical settings this list has had experience with for multiuser environments? Appreciated, Eugene

Hello, What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force attacks? I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a helpdesk call. What are some policies/techniques that have worked for this list with minimal hassle? Thanks! -Eugene

Am 02.11.2015 um 13:12 schrieb buhorojo: > On 02/11/15 12:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Hi all, this is not really a Samba question, but related, and I hope >> that some of you are using this and can tell me what I am doing wrong. >> >> On a member server, I can mount my shares by hand specifying "-o >> username=xxx,domain=yyy,password=zzz". But as soon as I

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

On 1/26/24 02:35, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> The share mounts and I am a member of the correct groups >> CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ cat /etc/fstab //fs.carlson.lab/test /mnt/test >> cifs credentials=/root/smbcreds,multiuser,sec=ntlmssp,_netdev 0 0 > I think

Hi! Folowing setup: 4x HD 500TB 1st: /boot 4GB, remaining part LVM 2nd, 3rd, 4th all LVM LVM volumes: - 30G /root - 8G /var - 8G /tmp - 200G /var/log/pgsql - 800G /var/spacewalk - 4G swap System boots into emergency mode because it does not find any of the logical volumes defined, because it does not enable the LVM volume group. Giving "lvm", then "vgchange -a y",

Hello, I have recently migrated my Win NT4 server to Linux with Samba 2.2.5 :-) One of the applications we need to run is Simply Accounting 9.0 / 2003 in multi-user mode. The company that makes Simply Accounting sais the data must be shared from Win NT,2000 or XP but sharing it through Win 95,98 or Samba could corrupt it. I know that Simply Accounting stores the data in .SDB database file

Hi. I was wondering if it is possible to do a Wine installation and installation of Windows applications where the applications are accessible to all users (or better yet, users in a certain group like "win32" or "wine")? I read in the most recent edition (March 18, 2005) of the Wine Weekly News that the global registry functionality had been removed. Is this necessary to have

>> I mean, putting the key in the keytab looks like a security risk to me. > In what way does it appear any more of a risk than having the keys > which you have there already? Even if someone steals the keytab, > they're gonna be hard pressed to crack the key in the few hours before > the tgt expires. Do you have very sensitive data maybe? Ok. And maybe I misunderstood

I am getting a permission denied when trying to ls as a domain user a samba mount with windows ACLs (sigh I thought I had this figured out).? I tried to include self descriptive server names and include them in the info below (fs1: file server, nc: addc, u2gui: ubuntu desktop) CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ ls -l /mnt ls: cannot access '/mnt/test': Permission denied total 0

Dear knowledgeable people, I'm running sshd 6.6.1p1 on RHEL 7.1. I've got a security requirement to run it as an ordinary user, let's say test-x, instead of root. It works well if I try to log in as test-x user with public key auth. Unfortunately I need sshd to serve other users as well. In order to let sshd switch uids I've set the CAP_SETUID and CAP_SETGID capabilities on

Hallo again, I would like to ask if there exists any possibility to have a Samba mount point with multiuser and with a credentials file or something similar. After a couple weeks testing I just find that my shares get disconnected after one week, which is not acceptable: I have stored some large project files on the Samba share which is opened in some calculation software, and simulations take up