similar to: prototype - get inputs()

hi all, my problem: i have a form that is sent through ajax with ajax.updater. the onsubmit function looks like this: new Ajax.Updater( { failure:''command_div'' }, ''/windows/chat_post'', { asynchronous:true, parameters:Form.serialize(this } ); return false; this works fine when I submit the form by pressing the submit button.

Hello! I have this page where I list all users in a table. There is checkbox in every row. My User-model has a "checked"-attribute. I have implemented the checkboxes like this: <%= check_box("user[]", "checked") %> Which outputs this: <input id="user_12_checked" name="user[12][checked]" type="checkbox" value="1"

I''m working again on unloading events before making my ajax call. This code works on Firefox/Opera, but IE doesn''t seem to get the onclick events registered. Could someone with IE take a look? http://hank.org/demos/ajax3.html The js is included in that file. There''s alerts() to show when the events are registered. The idea of the code is to look for any

Hi, I have implemented some RJS code and I have the same exact code in 2 different places. In one place I get the error "Element.update is not a function" and the other place works fine. Any idea why this error is coming? Breaking my head. -Vinod --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

When rendering the following partial, the <script> block isn''t getting rendered at all. Does rails strip this out or is it some limitation of the browser? <% remote_options = { :update => update, :with => "Form.serialize(''#{form}'')", :url => { :action => "process_multiple" } } %> <% do_before ||= nil %> <% click_fn =

I am trying to pass and array from an AJAX Javascript function to a controller. The parameter is being read as a single string and not an array. The Javascript function: function sendtolist(formName){ var form = $(formName) var checked = [] checked = form.getInputs("checkbox","plans[]").findAll(function(item) { return item.checked; }).pluck("value");

I''m trying to validate a record before save. I''m using one controller in this case furnii where I have all my calls. The problem is that, the form containing the field I''m trying to validate resides in the furnii views. I tried to add validates_presence_of :content (the field name) in both the furnii model and the ratecomment model but it does not work. I know there

Hello * Obviously the rhtml below does not work, but it should be apparent what I try to achieve - I would like to give the user the choice to submit a form either to action1 or action2 but I cannot figure out how?! It would be great if someone could give some assistance. Thanks a lot, Alex <%= start_form_tag :action1 => ''save'', :action2 =>

Hello people, I''m using squeegy fleximage for my site right now and having some difficulty to achieve some things. Updates photos are saved in created at date generated fom like : '' /images/2008/05/14/22.png '' . However this route is not accessible through the browser and I don''t know how to add it in my routes.rb knowing that the dates will change everyday.

Hello, For the following test case, reg.c #include <stdio.h> int getinput() { static int u=10; return u++; } int main() { int a,b,c,d,e,f,g; a=getinput(); b=getinput(); c=getinput(); d=getinput(); e=getinput(); f=getinput(); g=getinput(); printf("%d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",a,b,c,d,e,f,g); a=b=c=d=e=f=g=0; return 0; } *1.

I have the classic case of: Posts, and Categories. When the user submits a post, he has a drop-down list of categories. I want to put a "Add category" link next to the list of categories. This is already inside a form, so a "link_to_remote" that creates a small AJAX form inside the "submit post" form will not work because that will mean to embed a form in another

Hi to all. I''m installed XEN3.1 correctly but I''m some problem to start it. XEN start but I received this message: VFS: Cannot open root device "hda5" or unknown-block(0,0) Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) This is strange because my grub is configured like this:

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > If the TargetData pass isn't registered in the global registry, > getPassInfo() returns null. > > Now when you add a TargetData pass, it winds up in ImmutablePasses. > Any search through ImmutablePasses assumes that getPassInfo() for > every member returns something other than null.

On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: >> If the TargetData pass isn't registered in the global registry, >> getPassInfo() returns null. >> >> Now when you add a TargetData pass, it winds up in ImmutablePasses. >> Any search through ImmutablePasses

Dear all, I think this can be interesting for others too. For a while I tried to solve that problem - how to tabulate with ENTER/RETURN key too and not only with TAB. You know the problem - you are entering a lot of numbers from numeric keypad but you need to go far left to press TAB. This prevents one-hand data entry and prohibits web apps to be used by accountants, for instance. Here is a

>> Anyway, my present plan of attack is to have a "-defaulttarget" option >> with "none", "host", or a target string.  If -defaulttarget is not >> specified, the behavior of "opt" will be the same as it is presently. >> The defaulttarget will be overridden by the Module's target data if it >> has some.  "none"

If the TargetData pass isn't registered in the global registry, getPassInfo() returns null. Now when you add a TargetData pass, it winds up in ImmutablePasses. Any search through ImmutablePasses assumes that getPassInfo() for every member returns something other than null. So findAnalysisPass for *any* analysis pass can crash the system if the TargetData pass is lurking in the list without

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >>> Unfortunately, yes.  See PR4542.  Progress has been made recently >>> though -- the optimizers are now ready.  The main things left to do

Hello, I tried Shorewall for the first time today. I am currently using an up-to-date installation of Debian Sid, which has shorewall 4.2.10, shorewall-shell 4.2.10 and shorewall-perl 4.2.10.1. I noticed that even though I had the following /etc/shorewall/policy file, iptables would still show LOG rules at the end of the INPUT and OUTPUT chains instead of ULOG rules. (Other logging related rules

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: >> I think it's more intuitive to have command-line information override >> Module information. That's how llc works, for example. >> >> Also, is the argument to -defaulttarget a triple, an architecture name, >> or a targetdata string? If it's a triple, it'd be