similar to: Dynamic dns updates fail for (most) xp, vista and win7 clients

Hi Lucas ? Thanks, but the time is in sync on all clients and is updated on login by a login script. There's is no discrepancy in this regard between those clients that work and those that don't. :) ? On Wed 24-04-2013 10:47:?icro MEGAS <micromegas at mail333.com> wrote Check your time sync between clients and server. If the time is not in sync, it can result to Kerberos errors

===================================================================== "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." Benjamin Franklin ===================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.2. Changes since 4.2.0: -------------------- o

===================================================================== "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." Benjamin Franklin ===================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.2. Changes since 4.2.0: -------------------- o

Hi guys, I thought I should send a quick email through to report my experience upgrading a Samba3 + OpenLDAP site to Samba4. I did lots of reading and had a bunch of howto documents, including the official one, at my disposal. I set up a shiny new Ubuntu 12.04 64bit virtual machine using OpenVZ and installed the samba4 packages out of http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernevil. I went through the

see: To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba ;-) -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: klang at countyofdane.com [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Klang, Marvin Verzonden: woensdag 15 april 2015 22:02 Aan: 'kseeger at samba.org'; 'samba-announce at lists.samba.org';

Hai,   I've checked out the log you send and i re-read the complete thread.   Based on thats done and what i did see in you logs now, looks like a  * (wildcard)  entry is giving the problem. But i am not sure of that, the wildcard bugs should be fixed, when i look in bugzilla.  (#10435 #12952 )   I've forwarded the mail to Rowland also before we go throw things at you again. ;-)

Hello all, I have two new server samba4, with isc-dhcp and Bind. ( Thanks to Louis 's scripts ) The AD was migrate from 2 Windows 2000 servers last friday, with a copy of them in a private lan. Today we have shutdown the old windows 2000 server and put the 2 new samba4 in place of them. The problem is that the DHCP does not update the DNS systematically... That works with laptops ( which

Hello All, I have 2 samba4 AD server with dhpd and dynamic DNS. I have well understand that for now it's not possible to have 2 DHCP server running in the same time. So I would have at a time only one dhcp server running. If the first server got a problem I want to manually start the isc-dhcp service in the second to rescue the system. But It's not working as I expected... If I switch

Hai,   Seeing : > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: configured writeable > zone '168.192.in-addr.arpa' > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: zone local.laurenz.ws/NONE: has no > NS records > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone > 'local.laurenz.ws'   Normaly you should see first the local.laurenz.ws

Hello Marc I changed the rights back to 600 and root:root to sam.ldb and i think the rights of sam.ldb.d directory are correct. -rw------- 1 root root 16M Apr 2 17:29 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 10M Apr 2 17:29 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 26M Apr 2 17:28 DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb

Hi guys, I'm facing a problems with samba4 + bind9_dlz that consuming my time for several days. Everything is working fine until samba4 need to update dns when I'm work with more than one DC server. When samba (or bind) need to reload all zones, the module bind9_dlz is shutting down and then all my environment stops and I need to restart the bind to up again. See my log: ... Jan

Hi samba team ! I'm face with a new problem on a new Samba PDC install (Debian 9). I don't know why, but systemd run multiples "rndc reconfig" commands during the init script. So the bind9 log file show : -> A successful start -> A failed reconfig (samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone) at each boot/reboot. So I need to restart bind9 each time manually. I created a wrapper

Hi, I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up debugging on dlz_bind as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Debugging_the_BIND9_DLZ_Module When I try to start named I get the following in the logs: May 10 13:19:44 vdc2 named[23773]: starting BIND

Another mistake : The louis's script ddns-kerberos-check.sh was not running in hourly.cron directory ( i make a chmod 770 to resolve that ) to recall here what I did: - I cloned the Windows 2000 server AD servers on a private network and I migrated to samba4 - Meanwhile, users have continued to use the Windows 2000 AD servers on the production network - I replaced the production servers

hai, ? I just noticed, after my pc woke up my A record disapearred. of my 64bit windows. ? ? Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: client 10.249.250.64#49271: update 'INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD/IN' denied Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > This is probably where you are going wrong. AD lives and dies on DNS, > your DC MUST be authoritative for the AD domain. ...but *is* authoritative! Simply DHCP server assign the ''old'' DNS, where all resolution fr the AD (sub)domain are forwarded to AD DNS... > Your AD clients should be using the DC as

Hi everyone. I have a Linux nsupdate client sending dns update requests via sssd. Just gone from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3. I've done this: http://linuxcostablanca.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/samba4-bind9dlz-stale-dns-records-with.html After which the forward zone update is working fine: 2014-01-10T12:32:35.376142+01:00 hh16 named[4963]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone hh3.site

I suspect a zone overlap. Did you add an extra zone manualy in bind? Or something like this... You added : Zone1.Domain.TLD and then Domain.TLD But then with the reverse zones. Because this : > Jan 20 13:58:09 samba02 named[10811]: zone 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa/NONE: > has no NS records Does not look likes the samba_DLZ log lines but a pure bind log line. Review you bind config and

Hello, I have two samba 4.2.7-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy AD servers. since few days now I have some winbind errorsthat block the server... It seems that they appears more and more frequently... ( about one time per day ) I have about 200 clients pc with windows 10, seven and XP. Last month I've migrated about 30 pc from seven to 10. Is there a relationship? In the following logs, you can see

I'm running DNS on Windows too, as it receives the update, and delete it it it also erases the Samba, Windows so I could see are not leaving this I create new entries. Entries in samba via command or RSAT are working. Thanks Em 29-06-2016 12:33, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 29/06/16 14:48, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello! >> >> >> What DNS server is running