similar to: hide unwriteable files and windows xp

Hi, Try these params to hide files when users doesn't have read/write access to them. hide unreadable (S) This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be read. Defaults to off. Default: *hide unreadable = no* hide unwriteable files (S) This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be written to. Defaults to off. Note that

Thank you guys for your reply. I tried but it still does not work On 10/14/2015 5:37 PM, Stéphane PURNELLE wrote: > > These parameters must be put on share section, not in global section > > hide unreadable = yes > hide unwriteable files = yes > example > > [smb_shr1] > path = /mnt/LV002/share1 > read only = no > create mode = 0777

Hi all, I want to shows a user only the files that he/she has permission to access. I configured smb.conf like that: [global] workgroup = STORAGE encrypt passwords = yes security = user access based share enum = yes hide unreadable = yes hide unwriteable files = yes [smb_shr1] path = /mnt/LV002/share1 read only = no create mode = 0777

Greetings, I would like to see following option in a future release: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- hide unwritable (S) This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files or directories that cannot be write. Defaults to off. Default: hide unwritable = no -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Of

Hi all. I thying settings the option "hide unreadable" but not work. I tested in global section and share section, follow my settings now. after various tests. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BATLAB realm = BATLAB.CORP netbios name = GAUSS server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl,

Hello! If I need to distribute rails projects to our customers, and I want to hide source codes, how can I accomplish it? My manager is worried about our competitors stealing our codes. I know this is kinda weird situation because normally you build a web site and sell the service. But we plan to sell the application itself. Thanks. Sam -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, We have a setup like this: - W2003 AD PDC - Redhat Advanced Server 3.0 with Samba 3.0.0 / CUPS as a print server - Windows XP Professional clients Problem: Users can't connect printers, even administrators are out of luck, getting a "You are not allowed to connect printer" like messages. But there is one account that is allowed to connect printers, and after this account has

I''m using link_to_remote to show details for an item that''s clicked. I''d like to hide the div with the next click, or alternatively have a "Hide" link within my div. What is the best way to accomplish this? Here''s my existing code: <% for task in @mytasks %> <div class="rowFormat"> <%= link_to_remote(

Hello, I am trying to provide our users a way to change file/folder permissions on public share on samba (3.0.28a) ROLE_STANDALONE server. ACL's are working fine but the problem is to get list of users and groups on samba server via Windows XP Professional (SP3). When I open 'Select users or groups' dialog and pressing 'Find now' button the Windows asks my Samba

Hi!! We are trying to configure a Debian Linux Server as Samba Server (Domain Controller) and a Windows XP (with Service Pack 2) as client. We have configured Windows into the Samba Domain (in other words, we have been able to agregate the machine into the domain), but when we restart Windows and try to login with a samba user (from linux server) (selecting the Domain), we received a message

Hi We are running samba under digital unix. The hide dot files option doesn't appear to work I have a hunch this is because the initial directory listing is perhaps done as superuser. Under digital unix ls is the same as ls -a. Anyone come across this before or have any solutions? We are running version 1_9_18p7 TIA Sue Sue Gray sjgray@subcorp.com.au Network Analyst A.S.C.

Dear I'm using samba 3.5.6 + PDC and connected to LDAP directory In log level 1 there is many entries like this : Feb 18 18:28:00 samba smbd[3094]: create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Feb 18 18:28:00 samba smbd[3094]: [2011/02/18 18:28:00.255872, 1] smbd/service.c:678(make_connection_snum) Feb 18 18:28:00 samba smbd[3094]: create_connection_server_info

Hi Rowland, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_POSIX_ACLs What do you think about that config for the share FTPFiles ? Does it has some directives you would remove ? [FTPFiles] comment = Files path = /glftpd/site guest ok = no public = no writable = yes printable = no browseable = yes read only = no inherit acls = yes inherit permissions =

I can think of a couple of ways to accomplish this. You could create unix groups that contain users that can see some shares, then remove the read/write/execute bit (or specifically the -x bit) for world/others on the directorys that you want hidden from others. these same directories need to have group ownership assigned to the group that is able to see them, and r/w/x bits set at the

Hi all. I have 'hide dot files = yes' in my [homes] section, but it doesn't seem to work correctly. What could I be doing wrong? I'm using 2.0.0beta5, but I recall it not working with 1.9.x either... I currently have the following in my [homes] section: [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes path = %H Thanks, Dave

[global] workgroup = NPC server string = Samba Server %v netbios name = Atlantica security = user map to guest = bad user dns proxy = no hide files = /~*/ hide unwriteable files = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%S valid users = %S browseable = no guest ok = no writable = yes

Hi All, at work all our clients are macs (10.10 yosemite). We are trying to move from the classical afp file server to a samba based file server. After a lot of testing, things now works more or less: a mac server acts as Kerberos+OpenLDAP and a linux debian 7 box is doing the file server with samba 4.2.0. A client which has "joined" (which is bound in mac jargon) the

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:08:20AM +0200, samba.20.andwin at spamgourmet.com wrote: > Hello, > > at our site we're using the revision control software Mercurial. A typical > workflow scenariao is that we have a Mercurial repository on a Samba AD > Member share and the users pull and push commits to this central repository. > > This workflow is broken as of Samba 4.3.4.

I have a user who gets some random disconnects (well not exactly, it is more like her box goes insane randomly...explained better below). I was able to run a wireshark dump on her box and when the trigger action is performed I get a STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE. She is in MS Access an runs a report to trigger it (then she gets about a thousand "disk or network error" dialog boxes). The

I'm running Linux Fedora Core 2 with Samba 3.0.3-5 installed. I'm experiencing some strange behavior when I try to mount a FAT32 share on a Win2k workstation. After a fresh reboot, when I try smbmount (or mount.smb) everything seems to work (no error messages). Then when I try to access the mountpoint - via Nautilus or by doing "ls" in a terminal - the system freezes. If I